On 09/02/2014 06:40 PM, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On mar., 2014-09-02 at 21:38 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
>> I've started to investigate but again, that's a bit lower priority than
>> the Jessie-related stuff.
>
> Actually I can't work on pastel since the fs is full, so feel free to
> play
Hello.
Here is what I got so far with the package.
The reason autoreconf is not working seems to be that the m4 macros are
not being shipped with the package nor they are being included in
Makefile.am or configure.ac
After 'borrowing' the m4macros directory from xfce4-dev-tools and
including
On mar., 2014-09-02 at 21:38 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> I've started to investigate but again, that's a bit lower priority than
> the Jessie-related stuff.
Actually I can't work on pastel since the fs is full, so feel free to
play, I don't have time for that.
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
On 09/02/2014 04:55 PM, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On mar., 2014-09-02 at 21:54 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
>> So a patch with a "normal" dh-autoreconf would generally look
>> acceptable for you? (Just asking to be sure it's worth spending time
>> on it)
>
> Just calling --with autoreconf doesn't
* Yves-Alexis Perez (cor...@debian.org) [140902 21:39]:
> On mar., 2014-09-02 at 20:42 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Yves-Alexis Perez (cor...@debian.org) [140902 18:40]:
> > > On mar., 2014-07-29 at 18:04 -0300, Breno Leitao wrote:
> > > > I just tried to find this explaination at [1], but no
On mar., 2014-09-02 at 21:54 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> So a patch with a "normal" dh-autoreconf would generally look
> acceptable for you? (Just asking to be sure it's worth spending time
> on it)
Just calling --with autoreconf doesn't work, but if you manage to fix
that, sure, just add the pa
On mar., 2014-09-02 at 20:42 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Yves-Alexis Perez (cor...@debian.org) [140902 18:40]:
> > On mar., 2014-07-29 at 18:04 -0300, Breno Leitao wrote:
> > > I just tried to find this explaination at [1], but no luck. Do you
> > > mind providing
> > > me the link where you ex
* Yves-Alexis Perez (cor...@debian.org) [140902 18:40]:
> On mar., 2014-07-29 at 18:04 -0300, Breno Leitao wrote:
> > I just tried to find this explaination at [1], but no luck. Do you
> > mind providing
> > me the link where you explained why this is low priority?
>
> On all other ppc64el bugs op
On mar., 2014-07-29 at 18:04 -0300, Breno Leitao wrote:
> I just tried to find this explaination at [1], but no luck. Do you
> mind providing
> me the link where you explained why this is low priority?
On all other ppc64el bugs opened (usually by various ibm people but not
only). They don't even l
Hi Yves-Alexis,
On 07/29/2014 04:57 PM, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
>> So, I am going to ask you to patch the configure and aclocal.m4 files
>> to add
>> ppc64el as an architecture that supports shared objects.
>>
>> I got this patch from Canonical and it works fine on Debian/ppc64el.
>
> Well, we'l
Control: tag -1 wishlist
On mar., 2014-07-29 at 16:12 -0300, Breno Leitao wrote:
> Currently xfconf doesn't build on ppc64el because the package fail to
> identify
> ppc64el as a platform that support shared object.
>
> dh_install --fail-missing -X .la
> dh_install: libxfconf-0-de
Package: xfconf
Version: 4.10.0-2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64el
Dear Maintainer,
Currently xfconf doesn't build on ppc64el because the package fail to identify
ppc64el as a platform that support shared object.
dh_install --fail-missi
12 matches
Mail list logo
