On mar., 2014-09-02 at 21:54 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > So a patch with a "normal" dh-autoreconf would generally look > acceptable for you? (Just asking to be sure it's worth spending time > on it)
Just calling --with autoreconf doesn't work, but if you manage to fix that, sure, just add the patch to the BTS. Regards, -- Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
