On mar., 2014-07-29 at 18:04 -0300, Breno Leitao wrote: > I just tried to find this explaination at [1], but no luck. Do you > mind providing > me the link where you explained why this is low priority?
On all other ppc64el bugs opened (usually by various ibm people but not only). They don't even look tagged so it might be a bit hard to check. > > I understand that ppc64el is not a official architecture for now, but, > we are > trying to add it as an official architecture for Jessie. Well, ping us back when it is, if this bug is not fixed by that time. Regards, -- Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
