On mar., 2014-09-02 at 20:42 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Yves-Alexis Perez (cor...@debian.org) [140902 18:40]: > > On mar., 2014-07-29 at 18:04 -0300, Breno Leitao wrote: > > > I just tried to find this explaination at [1], but no luck. Do you > > > mind providing > > > me the link where you explained why this is low priority? > > > > On all other ppc64el bugs opened (usually by various ibm people but not > > only). They don't even look tagged so it might be a bit hard to check. > > ppc64el is now an official architecture, and this bug is blocking a > couple of other packages from being built. So a fix of this bug would > be helpful now. > > If it helps I could upload this fix with an NMU.
I already NACK'ed the patch touching the files directly, we need to make a clean autoreconf. I've started to investigate but again, that's a bit lower priority than the Jessie-related stuff. Regards, -- Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
