Bug#745402: fuse-emulator: Better support for ROM in Debian opense-basic package

2014-05-08 Thread Alberto Garcia
tags 745402 + upstream thanks On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 12:28:32PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > Can you forward upstream the part where tape saving routines do not > work well enough? (Maybe the author will realize this way that this > ROM exists to begin with). Sure, I can do that. One thing th

Bug#745402: fuse-emulator: Better support for ROM in Debian opense-basic package

2014-05-08 Thread Santiago Vila
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 11:28:16AM +0200, Alberto Garcia wrote: > On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 06:20:13PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > > > Well, the problem is that there is not any machine for which the > > default rom is opense.rom. > [...] > > Maybe a new machine for which this rom is the default

Bug#745402: fuse-emulator: Better support for ROM in Debian opense-basic package

2014-05-08 Thread Alberto Garcia
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 06:20:13PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > Well, the problem is that there is not any machine for which the > default rom is opense.rom. [...] > Maybe a new machine for which this rom is the default, even if it's > identical in hardware to the classical 48K Spectrum. At ri

Bug#745402: fuse-emulator: Better support for ROM in Debian opense-basic package

2014-05-07 Thread Santiago Vila
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 03:32:09PM +0200, Alberto Garcia wrote: > On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 03:10:30PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > > > Because fuse-emulator is free software and the Debian opense-basic > > package contains a free ROM for ZX Spectrum machines, I think the > > user should be a

Bug#745402: fuse-emulator: Better support for ROM in Debian opense-basic package

2014-05-07 Thread Alberto Garcia
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 03:10:30PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > Because fuse-emulator is free software and the Debian opense-basic > package contains a free ROM for ZX Spectrum machines, I think the > user should be able to select this ROM in the "Select ROMs" menu. But as I said earlier,

Bug#745402: fuse-emulator: Better support for ROM in Debian opense-basic package

2014-05-07 Thread Santiago Vila
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 03:26:31PM +0300, Alberto Garcia wrote: > So, in order to move this forward, could you describe the specific > problem that you would like to have solved? > > "Better support for OpenSE BASIC" is too generic, and the proposed > solution for having it in the "Machine->Select

Bug#745402: fuse-emulator: Better support for ROM in Debian opense-basic package

2014-05-07 Thread Alberto Garcia
So, in order to move this forward, could you describe the specific problem that you would like to have solved? "Better support for OpenSE BASIC" is too generic, and the proposed solution for having it in the "Machine->Select" menu is not very clear. Having the detection of the saving/loading rout

Bug#745402: fuse-emulator: Better support for ROM in Debian opense-basic package

2014-04-28 Thread Alberto Garcia
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 11:58:58AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > > Also Menu -> Options -> Select ROMs > > Well, I'd love to, but that doesn't work because opense.rom does not > appear in the list. That's because you don't get a list of all the available ROMs, but a file browser. You're suppose

Bug#745402: fuse-emulator: Better support for ROM in Debian opense-basic package

2014-04-27 Thread Santiago Vila
On Sun, 27 Apr 2014, Alberto Garcia wrote: > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 11:22:11AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > > > fuse --rom-48 /usr/share/spectrum-roms/opense.rom > > > > does the trick indeed, so it is not such a big problem. > > Also Menu -> Options -> Select ROMs Well, I'd love to, but tha

Bug#745402: fuse-emulator: Better support for ROM in Debian opense-basic package

2014-04-26 Thread Alberto Garcia
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 11:22:11AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > fuse --rom-48 /usr/share/spectrum-roms/opense.rom > > does the trick indeed, so it is not such a big problem. Also Menu -> Options -> Select ROMs > The main issue is the fact that taper routines are not properly > trapped and they

Bug#745402: fuse-emulator: Better support for ROM in Debian opense-basic package

2014-04-24 Thread Santiago Vila
On Wed, 23 Apr 2014, Alberto Garcia wrote: > On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 07:49:32PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > > > My point is that being opense.rom completely free, it would be a > > pity that fuse (which is also free) would not work well enough with > > it. > > Well, by default Fuse tries to us

Bug#745402: fuse-emulator: Better support for ROM in Debian opense-basic package

2014-04-23 Thread Alberto Garcia
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 07:49:32PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > My point is that being opense.rom completely free, it would be a > pity that fuse (which is also free) would not work well enough with > it. Well, by default Fuse tries to use the original ROMs and falls back to OpenSE if they are n

Bug#745402: fuse-emulator: Better support for ROM in Debian opense-basic package

2014-04-21 Thread Santiago Vila
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 07:21:55PM +0200, Alberto Garcia wrote: > > A quick and dirty hack would be to symlink se-0.rom to opense.rom > > and se-1.rom to opense-stub.rom, and then using F9 and choosing > > "Spectrum SE", but opense-stub.rom is almost empty while se-1.rom > > from the upstream tarba

Bug#745402: fuse-emulator: Better support for ROM in Debian opense-basic package

2014-04-21 Thread Alberto Garcia
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 01:32:25PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > I would like the ROM in the Debian opense-basic package to have the > same level of "support" as the others, i.e.: > > * An entry in "Machine->Select" GTK menu, allowing the selection of > this rom without having to remove all the

Bug#745402: fuse-emulator: Better support for ROM in Debian opense-basic package

2014-04-21 Thread Santiago Vila
Package: fuse-emulator-gtk Version: 1.1.1+dfsg1-2 Severity: wishlist I would like the ROM in the Debian opense-basic package to have the same level of "support" as the others, i.e.: * An entry in "Machine->Select" GTK menu, allowing the selection of this rom without having to remove all the oth