On 6 May 2014 05:52, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 03:49:38AM -0007, Cameron Norman wrote:
> > El Fri, 2 de May 2014 a las 8:12 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov
> > escribió:
> > >On 3 May 2014 03:55, Cameron Norman wrote:
> > >> El Fri, 2 de May 2014 a las 7:46 PM, Dimitri John Ledko
El Mon, 5 de May 2014 a las 9:52 PM, Steve Langasek
escribió:
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 03:49:38AM -0007, Cameron Norman wrote:
2) More than just init scripts source lsb init functions. Most
notably: many of the ifupdown scripts. Using basename would give you
problems because /etc/network/ifu
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 03:49:38AM -0007, Cameron Norman wrote:
> El Fri, 2 de May 2014 a las 8:12 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov
> escribió:
> >On 3 May 2014 03:55, Cameron Norman wrote:
> >> El Fri, 2 de May 2014 a las 7:46 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov
> >>
> >> escribió:
> >> Would you like any help, or
El Fri, 2 de May 2014 a las 8:12 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov
escribió:
On 3 May 2014 03:55, Cameron Norman wrote:
El Fri, 2 de May 2014 a las 7:46 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov
escribió:
Would you like any help, or do you got it?
Save attached file as /lib/lsb/init-functions.d/01-upstart-lsb .
On 3 May 2014 05:23, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 09:07:05PM -0700, Cameron Norman wrote:
>> Dimitri,
>
>> Your special casing of force-reload assumes the init script would have
>> put the action in the same boat as reload. Perusing through my
>> installed packages, force-reload
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 09:07:05PM -0700, Cameron Norman wrote:
> Dimitri,
> Your special casing of force-reload assumes the init script would have
> put the action in the same boat as reload. Perusing through my
> installed packages, force-reload is often paired with restart instead.
> I am not s
Dimitri,
Your special casing of force-reload assumes the init script would have
put the action in the same boat as reload. Perusing through my
installed packages, force-reload is often paired with restart instead.
I am not saying you should change it (restarting is the more
disruptive action, so d
On 3 May 2014 03:55, Cameron Norman wrote:
> El Fri, 2 de May 2014 a las 7:46 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov
> escribió:
>
> Would you like any help, or do you got it?
>
Save attached file as /lib/lsb/init-functions.d/01-upstart-lsb . This
is what i'm currently planning to do, this should mimic how ser
El Fri, 2 de May 2014 a las 7:46 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov
escribió:
On 3 May 2014 03:04, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi Cameron,
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 06:35:30PM -0700, Cameron Norman wrote:
Hey Steve,
Is there anything wrong with the script attached by Dimitri ( to
implement the no-op init
On 3 May 2014 03:04, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Cameron,
>
> On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 06:35:30PM -0700, Cameron Norman wrote:
>> Hey Steve,
>
>> Is there anything wrong with the script attached by Dimitri ( to
>> implement the no-op init script functionality mandated by policy)? If
>> not, would yo
El Fri, 2 de May 2014 a las 7:04 PM, Steve Langasek
escribió:
Hi Cameron,
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 06:35:30PM -0700, Cameron Norman wrote:
Hey Steve,
Is there anything wrong with the script attached by Dimitri ( to
implement the no-op init script functionality mandated by policy)?
If
not
Hi Cameron,
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 06:35:30PM -0700, Cameron Norman wrote:
> Hey Steve,
> Is there anything wrong with the script attached by Dimitri ( to
> implement the no-op init script functionality mandated by policy)? If
> not, would you like me to create a deb diff to add the script to th
Hey Steve,
Is there anything wrong with the script attached by Dimitri ( to
implement the no-op init script functionality mandated by policy)? If
not, would you like me to create a deb diff to add the script to the
appropriate directory?
Best,
--
Cameron Norman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debi
13 matches
Mail list logo
