Hi Adam!
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:08:27 +0200, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-04-28 at 15:40 +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
>> I guess another useful option would be the possibility to choose
>> which version debcheckout should retrieve, something similar to
>>
>> $ apt-get install $PACKAGE=$
Hi,
On Mon, 2008-04-28 at 15:40 +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
> I guess another useful option would be the possibility to choose which
> version debcheckout should retrieve, something similar to
>
> $ apt-get install $PACKAGE=$VERSION
>
> When a version is specified, the `apt-cache showsrc $PKG`
Hi there!
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 13:12:19 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 12:52:57PM +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
>> Can I disagree? We should not choose the "highest" version, because
>> this can be the one in experimental (which is wrong as well):
>
> NACK. IMO the one to
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote, Wednesday, April 23, 2008 12:12 PM
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 12:52:57PM +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
Can I disagree? We should not choose the "highest" version, because
this can be the one in experimental (which is wrong as well):
[...]
I haven't reviewed Adam patch tho
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 12:52:57PM +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
> Can I disagree? We should not choose the "highest" version, because
> this can be the one in experimental (which is wrong as well):
NACK. IMO the one to go is the one with the "highest" version. For the
case experimental it can be ei
Hi there!
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 07:22:39 +0200, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 09:30 +0800, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 09:51:42PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> [...]
>>> I'm not convinced this qualifies as "important", as the above is missing
>>> a conditi
On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 09:30 +0800, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 09:51:42PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[...]
> > I'm not convinced this qualifies as "important", as the above is missing
> > a condition - "and the X-Vcs-* headers differ between the available
> > source versi
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 09:51:42PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > `apt-cache showsrc $PKG` doesn't return unstable versions first, which
> > renders debcheckout quite useless if you have more than unstable in your
> > apt sources.
Ack.
> I'm not convinced this qualifies as "important", as the
Hi,
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 22:24 +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
> Package: devscripts
> Version: 2.10.26
> Severity: important
[...]
> in case the output below wouldn't be self-explicative, it seems that
> `apt-cache showsrc $PKG` doesn't return unstable versions first, which
> renders debcheckout quit
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.10.26
Severity: important
Hello,
in case the output below wouldn't be self-explicative, it seems that
`apt-cache showsrc $PKG` doesn't return unstable versions first, which
renders debcheckout quite useless if you have more than unstable in your
apt sources.
=
10 matches
Mail list logo
