On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 09:30 +0800, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 09:51:42PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: [...] > > I'm not convinced this qualifies as "important", as the above is missing > > a condition - "and the X-Vcs-* headers differ between the available > > source versions". > > FWIW: the fields are now "Vcs-*", heading "X-" is no longer needed. I > just don't want to leave false traces in whatever bug log about that :)
Force of habit. :-) > > I agree the current behaviour isn't optimal in such a case though. > > Taking the header from the highest available version would be one > > relatively easy solution. > > Ack on this solution, just choose the "highest" (assuming we have a good > definition of "highest", I postulate we can only approximate it) among > the available entries. I've implemented this solution in SVN. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
