On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 07:26:16PM -0400, James Vega wrote:
> I forgot to include vim-lesstif in here. Do we want to continue to
> provide that package modulo the above suggestion of including all
> language bindings with it? According to popcon, it's the least
> popular[0] binary package we gene
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 12:06:45PM -0400, James Vega wrote:
> I've actually been thinking of something like this for a while now and
> just hadn't had time to send out an RFC. My idea was more along the
> following lines:
>
> vim-gnome -- All currently supported language bindings, X11 w/Gnome
>
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 10:57:57AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 12:06:45PM -0400, James Vega wrote:
> > I've actually been thinking of something like this for a while now and
> > just hadn't had time to send out an RFC. My idea was more along the
> > following lines:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 12:06:45PM -0400, James Vega wrote:
> I've actually been thinking of something like this for a while now and
> just hadn't had time to send out an RFC. My idea was more along the
> following lines:
>
> vim-gnome -- All currently supported language bindings, X11 w/Gnome
>
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 03:09:48PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 01:15:57PM +0100, Benjamin A'Lee wrote:
> > Would it be possible for versions of vim-{python,ruby,perl,tcl,full} to be
> > built without GUI support? Currently, if I want the Ruby interpreter
> > support o
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 03:09:48PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> What I see as feasible would be to have a new variant which is basically
> vim-full but without X11 support, we could call it "vim-nox" (for "no
> X11") following the naming scheme that we can found in other packages.
> That woul
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 01:15:57PM +0100, Benjamin A'Lee wrote:
> Would it be possible for versions of vim-{python,ruby,perl,tcl,full} to be
> built without GUI support? Currently, if I want the Ruby interpreter
> support on a headless server, it's necessary to install 40+MB of X11/GTK+
> and relat
Package: vim
Version: 1:7.1-056+2
Severity: wishlist
Would it be possible for versions of vim-{python,ruby,perl,tcl,full} to be
built without GUI support? Currently, if I want the Ruby interpreter
support on a headless server, it's necessary to install 40+MB of X11/GTK+
and related libraries that
8 matches
Mail list logo