On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 12:06:45PM -0400, James Vega wrote: > I've actually been thinking of something like this for a while now and > just hadn't had time to send out an RFC. My idea was more along the > following lines: > > vim-gnome -- All currently supported language bindings, X11 w/Gnome > vim-gtk -- All currently supported language bindings, X11 w/Gtk > vim-full/nox -- All currently supported language bindings, no-X11
Is this one package proposal or two? I guess one, since otherwise there would be no differences among vim-full and vim-gnome, right? So I would go for vim-nox, which makes clear the purpose of the variant directly from the package name. Thanks for your investigations, I agree with this split idea. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what? [EMAIL PROTECTED],debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/ (15:56:48) Zack: e la demo dema ? /\ All one has to do is hit the (15:57:15) Bac: no, la demo scema \/ right keys at the right time
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
