On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 03:09:48PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > What I see as feasible would be to have a new variant which is basically > vim-full but without X11 support, we could call it "vim-nox" (for "no > X11") following the naming scheme that we can found in other packages. > That would mean that you will still need to pull in libraries supporting > the other interpreters you will not use, but diminish the need of X11 > libraries which I bet is the largest slice of the issue. > > What do you think? > Comments from the other maintainers?
This would be fine, as far as I'm concerned. libperl and tcl are fairly small, and python tends to get installed anyway; as long as X11/GTK aren't required. Thanks, -- Benjamin A'Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://subvert.org.uk/~bma/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
