On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 10:57:57AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 12:06:45PM -0400, James Vega wrote: > > I've actually been thinking of something like this for a while now and > > just hadn't had time to send out an RFC. My idea was more along the > > following lines: > > > > vim-gnome -- All currently supported language bindings, X11 w/Gnome > > vim-gtk -- All currently supported language bindings, X11 w/Gtk > > vim-full/nox -- All currently supported language bindings, no-X11 > > Is this one package proposal or two? I guess one, since otherwise there > would be no differences among vim-full and vim-gnome, right? So I would > go for vim-nox, which makes clear the purpose of the variant directly > from the package name.
Yeah, it was for one package. I just wasn't sure on the name to use at the time. vim-nox does make more sense since the other packages are named based on their GUI support. James -- GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
