On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 05:05:12PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 7 July 2006 at 12:47, Ross Boylan wrote:
> | I installed the version from stable, but the manual entry was not a
> | symlink. The upgrade to testing went smoothly. Judging from the
> | comments in the changelog, manual bei
On 7 July 2006 at 12:47, Ross Boylan wrote:
| On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 14:14 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 11:53:07AM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
| > I don't know. I tend to run only unstable/testing so I have more or less
| > forgotten when and how this changed. But the
On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 14:14 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 11:53:07AM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 20:58 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> > > On 5 July 2006 at 18:42, Ross Boylan wrote:
> > > | On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 07:59:58PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbu
tags 37694 + pending
thanks
Ok, so here is the bug status update I mentioned. Thanks again for the
report. This should make the package better.
Dirk
On 6 July 2006 at 14:14, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 11:53:07AM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
| > On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 20:58
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 11:53:07AM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 20:58 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> > On 5 July 2006 at 18:42, Ross Boylan wrote:
> > | On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 07:59:58PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> [..]
> >
> > | I have another system; I'm not sure i
On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 20:58 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> On 5 July 2006 at 18:42, Ross Boylan wrote:
> | On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 07:59:58PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
[..]
>
> | I have another system; I'm not sure if the html is installed there.
>
> Err, how about asking 'dpkg -s r-doc-
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 07:59:58PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
...
>
> Is it ok with you if I tag the bug as fixed, but leave it open til the next
> actual package upload (which may be a 2.4.0 prerelease at the end of summer).
>
> Regards, Dirk
>
That's great that you tracked it down so q
On 5 July 2006 at 18:42, Ross Boylan wrote:
| On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 07:59:58PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
| ...
| >
| > Is it ok with you if I tag the bug as fixed, but leave it open til the next
| > actual package upload (which may be a 2.4.0 prerelease at the end of
summer).
| >
|
On 5 July 2006 at 13:59, Ross Boylan wrote:
| On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 03:40:19PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| > What happens if you purge r-doc-html and reinstall? (We'd still need to fix
| > the bug on upgrade ...)
| >
|
| That fixes the problem. There are no warnings on install,
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 12:29:27PM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
> Package: r-doc-html
> Version: 2.3.1-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Severity Note: I don't know how significant these errors are. May be
> trivial, or it may make the docs unusable. In fact, when I try to browse
> /usr/share/doc/r-doc-ht
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 03:40:19PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> What happens if you purge r-doc-html and reinstall? (We'd still need to fix
> the bug on upgrade ...)
>
That fixes the problem. There are no warnings on install, and the
files are there.
Your upgrade test used the same v
Package: r-doc-html
Version: 2.3.1-1
Severity: normal
Severity Note: I don't know how significant these errors are. May be trivial,
or it may make the docs unusable. In fact, when I try to browse
/usr/share/doc/r-doc-html/manual all the files are 0 bytes and I get "file does
not seem to exist
12 matches
Mail list logo
