On 5 July 2006 at 18:42, Ross Boylan wrote:
| On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 07:59:58PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
| ...
| >
| > Is it ok with you if I tag the bug as fixed, but leave it open til the next
| > actual package upload (which may be a 2.4.0 prerelease at the end of
summer).
| >
| > Regards, Dirk
| >
| That's great that you tracked it down so quickly. It's fine with me
| if you handle it that way.
Well, I haven't fully tested it. It is mostly based on your analysis --- as
well as basically identical reports on other parts of the r-base packages due
to directory moves etc pp.
| I have another system; I'm not sure if the html is installed there.
Err, how about asking 'dpkg -s r-doc-html' ? Wouldn't that tell you?
| If it is, would manually deleting the "manual" link before upgrade be
| sufficient to get things to work smoothly?
I hope so as the suggested fix is trying to the same :) Why don't you test
it manually if you have other system with a similar setup, or can recreate
your setup?
Dirk
--
Hell, there are no rules here - we're trying to accomplish something.
-- Thomas A. Edison
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
