On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 14:14 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 11:53:07AM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: > > On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 20:58 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > > On 5 July 2006 at 18:42, Ross Boylan wrote: > > > | On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 07:59:58PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > [..] > > > > > > | I have another system; I'm not sure if the html is installed there. > > > > > > Err, how about asking 'dpkg -s r-doc-html' ? Wouldn't that tell you? > > Yes; I just wasn't on the system. > > > > > > | If it is, would manually deleting the "manual" link before upgrade be > > > | sufficient to get things to work smoothly? > > > > > > I hope so as the suggested fix is trying to the same :) Why don't you > > > test > > > it manually if you have other system with a similar setup, or can recreate > > > your setup? > > The other system doesn't have r-doc-html installed. What version do I > > need to test it? stable? > > I don't know. I tend to run only unstable/testing so I have more or less > forgotten when and how this changed. But the changelog documents it. > > If you can't test it, we simply won't test it. > I installed the version from stable, but the manual entry was not a symlink. The upgrade to testing went smoothly. Judging from the comments in the changelog, manual being a symlink is a pretty feature; it's a little surprising it survived so long on my machine.
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
