Bug#1101208: (no subject)

2025-04-13 Thread Fabio Fantoni
Il 13/04/2025 11:50, c.bu...@posteo.jp ha scritto: I ran a battery of manual tests using the 1.5.4 version available from the unstable repo. I found no RC or other hard issues. So I confirm it is working and can be released. Thanks, if you will find important issues that will be fixed upstream

Bug#1101208: (no subject)

2025-04-13 Thread c.buhtz
I ran a battery of manual tests using the 1.5.4 version available from the unstable repo. I found no RC or other hard issues. So I confirm it is working and can be released.

Bug#1101208:

2025-04-11 Thread Fabio Fantoni
Il 11/04/2025 13:50, c.bu...@posteo.jp ha scritto: Hello Fabio, My apologize there might be a missunderstanding. Am 11.04.2025 12:07 schrieb Fabio Fantoni: Hi, I wanted at least a test of the package to be done on Sid before requesting the upload to a DD, now I tried it and sent a request I u

Bug#1101208:

2025-04-11 Thread c . buhtz
Hello Fabio, My apologize there might be a missunderstanding. Am 11.04.2025 12:07 schrieb Fabio Fantoni: Hi, I wanted at least a test of the package to be done on Sid before requesting the upload to a DD, now I tried it and sent a request I used the tar.gz file (source tarball) available at up

Bug#1101208:

2025-04-11 Thread Fabio Fantoni
Il 09/04/2025 08:48, c.bu...@posteo.jp ha scritto: Hello, My apologize for asking again. I just want to be sure that I not might have misunderstood something? The freeze is near, but there is no upload yet. Is there any task that need to be done before? Regards, Christian Hi, I wanted at le

Bug#1101208:

2025-04-08 Thread c . buhtz
Hello, My apologize for asking again. I just want to be sure that I not might have misunderstood something? The freeze is near, but there is no upload yet. Is there any task that need to be done before? Regards, Christian

Bug#1101208: /usr/bin/backintime: New upstream version 1.5.4 targeting Trixie

2025-04-04 Thread Fabio Fantoni
Il 04/04/2025 16:50, c.bu...@posteo.jp ha scritto: Am 04.04.2025 16:45 schrieb c.bu...@posteo.jp: I would call this a bug in Debian's copyright checking tool then. The rule is simpel: If SPDX meta data is provided all other comments/headers should be ignored. Please let me know if you open a bug

Bug#1101208: /usr/bin/backintime: New upstream version 1.5.4 targeting Trixie

2025-04-04 Thread c . buhtz
Am 04.04.2025 18:58 schrieb Fabio Fantoni: Il 04/04/2025 16:50, c.bu...@posteo.jp ha scritto: That bug seems for tool not supporting all SPDX licenses Yes, but it could work the other way around. Our use case could be considered whi

Bug#1101208: /usr/bin/backintime: New upstream version 1.5.4 targeting Trixie

2025-04-04 Thread c . buhtz
Hello Fabio, Thank you for working on this. Me and the user appreciate this. Am 04.04.2025 15:43 schrieb Fabio Fantoni: noticed that updating d/copyright is a waste a lot of time, especially for the many false positives generated by the checks due to the citation of the main license of the progr

Bug#1101208: /usr/bin/backintime: New upstream version 1.5.4 targeting Trixie

2025-04-04 Thread c . buhtz
Am 04.04.2025 16:45 schrieb c.bu...@posteo.jp: I would call this a bug in Debian's copyright checking tool then. The rule is simpel: If SPDX meta data is provided all other comments/headers should be ignored. Please let me know if you open a bug report about it, so I can subscribe it. This mig

Bug#1101208: /usr/bin/backintime: New upstream version 1.5.4 targeting Trixie

2025-04-04 Thread c . buhtz
Hello Fabio Am 04.04.2025 16:23 schrieb Fabio Fantoni: I mean this text on comment on any file: # This file is part of the program "Back In Time" which is released under GNU # General Public License v2 (GPLv2). See file/folder LICENSE or go to #

Bug#1101208: /usr/bin/backintime: New upstream version 1.5.4 targeting Trixie

2025-04-04 Thread Fabio Fantoni
Il 04/04/2025 16:06, c.bu...@posteo.jp ha scritto: Hello Fabio, Thank you for working on this. Me and the user appreciate this. Am 04.04.2025 15:43 schrieb Fabio Fantoni: noticed that updating d/copyright is a waste a lot of time, especially for the many false positives generated by the checks

Bug#1101208: /usr/bin/backintime: New upstream version 1.5.4 targeting Trixie

2025-04-04 Thread Fabio Fantoni
Il 24/03/2025 23:14, Christian Buhtz ha scritto: Dear Maintainers, because I am not sure if the new WATCH file works (#1087686), please allow me to mention that we at upstream do have a new stable release version 1.5.4 and hoping that it will make it into upcoming Debian 13 on time. https://git

Bug#1101208: /usr/bin/backintime: New upstream version 1.5.4 targeting Trixie

2025-03-27 Thread Christian Buhtz
Package: backintime-common Version: 1.3.3-4 Severity: normal File: /usr/bin/backintime Dear Maintainers, because I am not sure if the new WATCH file works (#1087686), please allow me to mention that we at upstream do have a new stable release version 1.5.4 and hoping that it will make it into upc