Bug#100332: AAssoholics Anonymous - A ccure for being a butthead!

2008-09-03 Thread Geri Ahluwalia
Boulders. It had at last become a tribe, a rural pay my debts. so i went to receive my salary, of three exists, without being weakened, in all king. Protected by thee, the pandavas are residing rupavahikas the aswakas, the pansurashtras, the.

Bug#100332: What happens in vegas depends on you

2008-06-02 Thread mao
A difference in an inch brings out a whole new world http://www.limzarde.com/

Bug#100332: Measure Up To the Present

2008-03-26 Thread Nello Permale
Hot chicks dig bigger, larger, mega pricks http://www.Plivicates.com/ Give her the ride of her life -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#100332: Blow your load in Linday

2008-03-24 Thread mohammd Barreto
Never have any more lonely nights with your new huge pecker http://www.Hardrockhard.com/ Titties and beavers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#100332: Achieve the size you always wanted

2008-03-22 Thread irune solis
Order your Men’s supplement today and start gaining inches. http://www.Drengenets.com/ Get paid starring in our porno film -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#100332: arteriole audit anxiety

2008-03-17 Thread Ophelia Lindsey
Buy Prescriptiosn and Mediactions before it is too late www.ahasteroidal.augend%2Epotorswe.com on arterioleaudit -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#100332: New online vacancies in our company United States.

2008-02-29 Thread bax tuan
International company Dex. Union Inc is looking for top candidates for a number of opportunities: Sales representative, Finance representative. We are searching for individuals in United States who have the intellectual capacity and interested in good earnings. Get job in 3 hours after your ans

Bug#100332: Drugs for confidents! Great offers

2008-02-22 Thread Victoria Downing
has been tested and sold to over 300,000 Men worldwide. - Without Any Medical advisor Visitations - Complete Customer Gratification http://www.amongleft.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#100332: Show her whos the man

2008-02-11 Thread chadd abbey
Pop this twice a day to increase your lenght and girth considerably. if your lady tells you that size is of no importance, she is lying to you. studies clearly show that the intimate life of couples whose man has a smaller one is a lot less active than their counterparts who have big sizes. So th

Bug#100332: Truly great madness can not be achieved without significant intelligence.

2007-10-31 Thread Maurice
It seems to be an appropriate way to say hello to OOP lovers :) Man is by nature a political animal. There is no more beautiful life than that of a student. The best way to keep children at home is to make the home a pleasant atmosphere and let the air out of the tires. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, em

Bug#100332:

2007-10-07 Thread garner knute
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#100332: experts recommend using PC

2007-04-03 Thread prasenjit i
Premium View demo Low WMV MB http://img444.imageshack.us/my.php?image=frfk4.gif drive OS addition now powers Preface -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#100332: Adobe Acrobat 8.0 ready to download

2007-01-26 Thread Jacques Quintero
Adobe Acrobat enables business, creative, and engineering professionals who work with graphically complex documents to improve the reliability and efficiency of business-critical document exchange through PDF technology. Adobe Acrobat 8.0 Professional has the following features in addition to the

Bug#100332: =?koi8-r?b?PT9LT0k4LVI/UT89RTk9REEgPUNDPUM1PUQzPUQ1ID1EQj1DMT1DQT1DQj1DMSA9RDA9Q0Y9QzQ9

2006-11-01 Thread Edgar Delarosa
RDc9QzE9Q0M9Qzk9Q0M9QzEgPz0=?= Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 12:14:33 +0480 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="koi8-r"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.

Bug#100332: my destiny

2006-05-23 Thread Gilberto
Hi, Hope I am not writing to wrong address. I am nice, pretty looking girl. I am planning on visiting yourb town this month. aCan we meet each other in person? Message me back at [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact

Bug#100332: New package splitting scheme for teTeX in Debian

2005-11-10 Thread Frank Küster
Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> So we should keep them in -core. I just checked whether we >> distribute any gf files, and since this is not the case, it seemed >> not necessary to me. But we should keep in mind that add-on font >> packages might have .gf files. >> > Metafont creat

Bug#100332: New package splitting scheme for teTeX in Debian

2005-11-09 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 27.10.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, > >> /usr/bin/pktogf (convert packed font files to generic font files) > >> /usr/bin/gftopk (and back) > > > > This is used by mktexpk! > > So we should keep them in -core. I just checked whethe

Bug#100332: New package splitting scheme for teTeX in Debian

2005-10-28 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 11:37:47AM +0200, Frank K??ster wrote: > Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Is it really necessary to reduce the package as much as necessary for > > the buildds? Wouldn't a more useful goal for a larger number of users > > be to break the package into a "core"

Bug#100332: New package splitting scheme for teTeX in Debian

2005-10-28 Thread Frank Küster
Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is it really necessary to reduce the package as much as necessary for > the buildds? Wouldn't a more useful goal for a larger number of users > be to break the package into a "core" package, which is the "common" > stuff (somewhat arbitrarily defined), w

Bug#100332: Bug#51869: New package splitting scheme for teTeX in Debian

2005-10-27 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 07:07:53PM +0200, Norbert Preining wrote: > But, for now, I see no possibility of *coexistance* of tetex and texlive > on the same system (ie mixing of packages) due to the overlap of > packages. > > Once I will write a script checking for every package whether it > actuall

Bug#100332: New package splitting scheme for teTeX in Debian

2005-10-27 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 03:56:21PM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote: > Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hmmm. These are small binaries with very little in the way of > > dependencies. Could probably lose them to tetex-bin-extra or > > tetex-bin-litprog, though. > > That was all I was talkin

Bug#100332: Bug#51869: New package splitting scheme for teTeX in Debian

2005-10-27 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi all! After some days off I am back and want to give some comments: On Die, 25 Okt 2005, Elrond wrote: > If they're not intended to coexist at all, this does not > affect TeX at all. Each does its own job and decides on how > to rule the world, and conflicts with the other. Job done. As I see

Bug#100332: New package splitting scheme for teTeX in Debian

2005-10-27 Thread Frank Küster
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> 2. guidelines for splitting >> > [...] >> >> 3. Some possible splitting schemes >>=== > > I have now set up a project homepage on alioth > > http://pkg

Bug#100332: New package splitting scheme for teTeX in Debian

2005-10-27 Thread Frank Küster
Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 15:56 +0200, Frank Küster wrote: >> >> mpost, >> >> mpto, >> >> makempx >> >> /usr/bin/makempy (MetaPost) >> >> /usr/bin/mptopdf >> > >> > I would suggest that MetaPost is now regarded as a core component of a >> > moder

Bug#100332: New package splitting scheme for teTeX in Debian

2005-10-27 Thread Frank Küster
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2. guidelines for splitting > [...] > > 3. Some possible splitting schemes >=== I have now set up a project homepage on alioth http://pkg-tetex.alioth.debian.org/ with only one topic, splittin

Bug#100332: New package splitting scheme for teTeX in Debian

2005-10-27 Thread Ralf Stubner
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 15:56 +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > >> mpost, > >> mpto, > >> makempx > >> /usr/bin/makempy (MetaPost) > >> /usr/bin/mptopdf > > > > I would suggest that MetaPost is now regarded as a core component of a > > modern TeX distribution, so I'd suggest keeping it in th

Bug#100332: New package splitting scheme for teTeX in Debian

2005-10-27 Thread Frank Küster
Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Agreed up to here. > >> /usr/bin/tangle >> /usr/bin/tie >> /usr/bin/ctangle >> /usr/bin/weave >> /usr/bin/ctie >> /usr/bin/cweave (CWEB stuff) > > Hmmm. These are small binaries with very little in the way of > dependencies. Could probably lose them to

Bug#100332: New package splitting scheme for teTeX in Debian

2005-10-26 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 02:56:29PM +0200, Frank K??ster wrote: > Here are some more suggestions for the opt-out list, including what > you already provided: > > omega, > aleph, > omfonts, > odvicopy, > odvitype, > otangle, > otp2ocp, > outocp (Omega) > /usr/bin/opl2ofm > /usr/bin/ov

Bug#100332: New package splitting scheme for teTeX in Debian

2005-10-25 Thread Ralf Stubner
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 19:51 +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > Do you think it should be possible to have combinations like > "tetex-bin, tetex-base plus ConTeXt from texlive"? Would be nice, but not strictly necessary. > Or do you think that > someone will want tetex-extra on top of some parts of t

Bug#100332: tetex splitting (was: Bug#334611: tetex-bin: Please compile xdvi with lesstif2)

2005-10-25 Thread Frank Küster
(switching bugs, because we want to concentrate the ongoing discussion about the splitting scheme in one bug per source package) Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Oh, and for Debian stable users it will take until 2008 or 2009 until > they can get a smaller tetex-base package - for the re

Bug#100332: Bug#51869: New package splitting scheme for teTeX in Debian

2005-10-25 Thread Frank Küster
Elrond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 01:32:08PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > >> But I am not familiar to the >> problems that the X people tried to solve with the modularized xlibs wrt >> this transition; > > I haven't followed it too deeply either. But the generic > idea I

Bug#302035: Non-European fonts: tetex-base or -extra? (was: Bug#100332: New package splitting scheme for teTeX in Debian)

2005-10-25 Thread Frank Küster
Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 16:28 +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > >> - PSNFSS fonts, the CM and EC fonts in Metafont and Type1 format, if >> available. > > To what extend do we want internationlization? Should people be able to > produce documentation in Russia

Bug#100332: New package splitting scheme for teTeX in Debian

2005-10-25 Thread Frank Küster
Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 16:28 +0200, Frank Küster wrote: >> I expect that teTeX will continue to be the standard package for >> creating documentation when building a Debian package, and I think that >> we should try to develop our splitting schemes mainly

Bug#100332: New package splitting scheme for teTeX in Debian

2005-10-25 Thread Frank Küster
Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > dvipdfm ebb (unsure about those) I don't think we need them in tetex-bin-core or however it's going to be called. I don't think that dvipdfm is used to create pdf in any automated system. We can always put it back if somebody complains. Or rather, as a

Bug#100332: Bug#51869: New package splitting scheme for teTeX in Debian

2005-10-25 Thread Elrond
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 01:32:08PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: [...] > > This might be an important question in a sensible split. > > For example the big modularized xlibs was done in parts to > > help migrating from xfree to xorg. > > Please note that we do not plan to "transition" from tetex to t

Bug#302035: Bug#100332: New package splitting scheme for teTeX in Debian

2005-10-24 Thread Ralf Stubner
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 20:28 +0200, Ralf Stubner wrote: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 16:28 +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > > - PSNFSS fonts, the CM and EC fonts in Metafont and Type1 format, if > > available. > > To what extend do we want internationlization? Should people be able to > produce docume

Bug#100332: New package splitting scheme for teTeX in Debian

2005-10-24 Thread Ralf Stubner
Some additions On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 20:40 +0200, Ralf Stubner wrote: > tetex-bin-extra: > omega, aleph, omfonts, odvicopy, odvitype, otangle, otp2ocp, outocp (Omega) mkocp (Omega) > mpost, mpto, makempx (MetaPost) dmp dvitomp (MetaPost) > texexec (ConTeXt) > pltotf, tftopl, vftovp, vptovf (

Bug#100332: New package splitting scheme for teTeX in Debian

2005-10-24 Thread Ralf Stubner
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 17:27 +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 04:28:25PM +0200, Frank K??ster wrote: > >> > >> * advanced scheme > >> ^^^ > >> Additionally, tetex-bin-nox is split into tetex-bin-mini and > >> tetex-

Bug#100332: New package splitting scheme for teTeX in Debian

2005-10-24 Thread Ralf Stubner
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 16:28 +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > regarding tetex-bin > > a) #78926: If possible, it'd be nice if dvips were a seperate package, >so that users of printfilters, e.g., don't need tetex-bin installed. > >[is this really a realistic scenario? How many systems are th

Bug#100332: debian texlive

2005-10-24 Thread Norbert Preining
> From: Elrond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Bug#51869: New package splitting scheme for teTeX in Debian > To: Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 12:34:55 +0200 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 [..] > Where can I check the current status of "tex-live for >

Bug#100332: New package splitting scheme for teTeX in Debian

2005-10-24 Thread Frank Küster
Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 04:28:25PM +0200, Frank K??ster wrote: > >> 3.1 tetex-bin >> >> * minimal scheme >> ^^ >> tetex-bin is split into tetex-bin-nox and tetex-bin-x11; tetex-bin >> continues to exist as a dummy package. Besides sorting

Bug#100332: Bug#51869: New package splitting scheme for teTeX in Debian

2005-10-24 Thread Frank Küster
Hi Elrond, Elrond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 04:28:25PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > [...] >> 2. guidelines for splitting >> >> >> Etch will (if nothing very surprising happens) come with two alternative >> TeX systems: teTeX and TeX-Live. T

Bug#100332: [Elrond] Re: Bug#51869: New package splitting scheme for teTeX in Debian

2005-10-24 Thread Frank Küster
--- Begin Message --- On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 04:28:25PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: [...] > 2. guidelines for splitting > > > Etch will (if nothing very surprising happens) come with two alternative > TeX systems: teTeX and TeX-Live. TeX-Live is not only much bigger an

Bug#100332: New package splitting scheme for teTeX in Debian

2005-10-24 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 04:28:25PM +0200, Frank K??ster wrote: > 3.1 tetex-bin > > * minimal scheme > ^^ > tetex-bin is split into tetex-bin-nox and tetex-bin-x11; tetex-bin > continues to exist as a dummy package. Besides sorting files with dh_* > and writing the necessary control

Bug#100332: New package splitting scheme for teTeX in Debian

2005-10-24 Thread Frank Küster
Dear all, there are a lot of requests for a more clever splitting of tetex-base, -bin, and -extra in the BTS. Now that we are early in the release cycle of etch, and teTeX-3.0 is finally in unstable, I want to approach the question of splitting. This mail goes to all the bugs that refer to spli

Bug#100332: And now for something completely different... etch!

2005-06-07 Thread Frans Pop
On Tuesday 07 June 2005 01:03, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > Feel free to add some new items or add (hopefully new) information to > the ones I list below: > -- [ Overall improvements ] - Implement some package reorga

Bug#100332: Start saving now

2005-02-15 Thread Dorothea Kerr
Today is a new day for your residence. With levels at their headline-making historic lows, our programs are better now than ever before. Even if you've recently closed on a property, now is the time to check your numbers. Our advisors are here to help you decide your options. In fact, did you