On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 04:28:25PM +0200, Frank K??ster wrote: > 3.1 tetex-bin > > * minimal scheme > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > tetex-bin is split into tetex-bin-nox and tetex-bin-x11; tetex-bin > continues to exist as a dummy package. Besides sorting files with dh_* > and writing the necessary control information, the only thing we have to > do is connected to mf: we probably need to set up an alternatives system > for mf-nowin and mfw. > > * advanced scheme > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > Additionally, tetex-bin-nox is split into tetex-bin-mini and > tetex-bin-extra (or similar), where tetex-bin-mini contains only > pdfetex, mf-nowin and dvips plus the needed scripts/binaries smaller > than 100K. This would require more work, because finding out which > small programs are needed isn't trivial.
I agree with this in principle, but not using a size criterion. Rather, those binaries which depend on something in tetex-extra (eg aleph, omega, whatever we put there) should move to tetex-bin-extra and those which don't can stay in tetex-bin. Also, would tetex-bin-core be a better name? Julian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
