On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 17:15:07 +0100 =?utf-8?q?Aur=C3=A9lien_COUDERC?= <
couc...@debian.org> wrote:
> Package: packagekit
> Version: 1.3.0-2
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> running pkcon get-distro-ugrades on a testing/unstable system waits
> forever and never returns.
That should not ha
On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 22:36:33 +0100 Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues <
jo...@debian.org> wrote:
> Package: packagekit
> Version: 1.2.6-5
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: jbi...@debian.org
Version 1.2.6 is from Debian Stable. So, I guess you're reporting it from
Debian Stable and not Trixie.
> Hi
On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 06:29:00 +0100 Sid T wrote:
> Addressed in https://github.com/PackageKit/PackageKit/pull/780
Fixed in upstream commit
https://github.com/sidt4/PackageKit/commit/d6b5f2cb654067d69620335f1dc64f7354cbfb81
.
Guess this bug can be closed now, as virtualbox installs fine in Unstable.
Sorry, I did search for "changelog" in the bug list, but somehow thought
existing bugs were irrelevant based on bug titles.
debbugs is a nightmare (at least for me) with no issue tagging etc as in
GitLab, GitHub, and I always lose hope and give up sooner than later.
On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 at 12:21,
Can this bug be closed ?
Can this bug be closed ?
> When I select "Power off" from the power menu at the top right of the
> screen if there any pending package updates then instead of shutting
> down GNOME will reboot into a single user mode, apply the pending
> package updates and then shut down. I have never noticed any visible
> indication tha
This was fixed in 47.rc.
Get the following after in Debian unstable "apt install cambalache".
$ cambalache
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/cambalache", line 42, in
from cambalache.app import CmbApplication
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/cambalache/__init__.py", line 90, in
from .cmb_v
Works fine. Thanks!
On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 at 14:03, Debian Bug Tracking System <
ow...@bugs.debian.org> wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> which was filed against the gvfs package:
>
> #1096016: gvfs: Microsoft OneDrive account support is broken (update to
> gvfs
On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 13:47:23 +0100 Simon McVittie wrote:
> (Please keep a brief summary of the bug in the subject line when replying
> to bug reports: maintainers will often see your message out of context,
> among hundreds of other messages.)
Sure. I clicked the "Reply" in "Reply or subscribe to
This spams `journalctl` when not run from the console.
$ grilo-test-ui-0.3
profiling:/build:Cannot create directory
profiling:/build/reproducible-path/libdmapsharing-3.9.13/libdmapsharing/.libs/libdmapsharing_4_0_la-gst-util.gcda:Skip
profiling:/build:Cannot create directory
profiling:/build/repro
Upstream issue at https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libdmapsharing/-/issues/59.
Works now with 0.3.21 in Debian Unstable.
Thanks for the quick response!
On Wed, 11 Sep 2024 18:08:35 +0200 Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> PS: is the package available in some VCS?
Refer https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1075989.
Also, cdemu upstream in sourceforge allows direct debian packaging
$ git clone https://git.code.sf.net/p/cdemu/code cdemu-code
On Sun, 11 Aug 2024 10:42:53 +0100 Sid T wrote:
> This is already fixed in later versions of GNOME Software.
>
> I'll try to submit a backport patch to salsa.
Submitted
https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/gnome-software/-/merge_requests/17.
Addressed in https://github.com/PackageKit/PackageKit/pull/780
Licence reporting related issues have been fixed in recent versions of
GNOME Software ( 45 / 46 / .. etc. )
Please upgrade to a later version of GNOME Software, as this bug was
reported against an old / unsupported version.
Licence reporting related issues have been fixed in recent versions of
GNOME Software ( 45 / 46 / .. etc. )
Please upgrade to a later version of GNOME Software, as this bug was
reported against an old / unsupported version.
Can this be closed now ?
I cannot reproduce this in GNOME Software 46.x.
Probably got fixed at some point.
This is already fixed in later versions of GNOME Software.
I'll try to submit a backport patch to salsa.
This is not a GNOME Software issue, but a PackageKit one.
This is reported in https://github.com/PackageKit/PackageKit/issues/645.
Fix is available from PackageKit 1.2.8 .
Lot of performance improvements have gone into GNOME Software 44, 45, 46
etc, which needs to be backported to GNOME Software 43.x (quite old) being
used in Debian 12.
GNOME Software 47 will be released next month.
Hi,
Please create an issue at
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-software/-/issues/ to report it
directly to GNOME Software upstream.
Guess this has already been addressed in
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-software/-/issues/2574/.
Can you confirm ?
Reported https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-software/-/issues/2629
Unless the issue is specific to debian, you can always report the issue
directly to GNOME Software project at
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-software/-/issues/
Can you close this issue ?
That's right.
"software-properties-gtk" dependency was dropped in
https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/gnome-software/-/commit/4af15040ab89363a3510b49a90092992bcacb150
and reintroduced in
https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/gnome-software/-/commit/76510ecfa6bef5e8d42a03a61e0c0b9a3d5ed3f1
as par
For anyone planning to address this issue:
https://github.com/mgalgs/gnome-shell-system-monitor-applet is the
currently actively maintained fork of the unmaintained
https://github.com/paradoxxxzero/gnome-shell-system-monitor-applet.
The following commit message from the fork should clarify things
@smcv: Agree we should remove gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor for the
time being. Thanks for updating #1052108.
GNOME Shell 46 works fine in Unstable. Thanks for the GS 46 transition
Jeremy!
Release Team, we have finished the uploads to Unstable we were
planning to do for the GNOME Shell 46 transition. Here is my guess on
the hints to remove incompatible packages:
force-badtest budgie-desktop/10.8.2-3
remo
I think if "budgie-desktop" is following its own path, then it should take
care of the extra effort needed in this case.
Stalling GNOME shell 45 for 10 months is not good.
Doesn't debian have a policy for handling issues like this ?
Guess this is due to the "python3.12" transition in Debian.
Refer https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/python3.12-default.html
Control: retitle -1 Fails to remove packages during update (backport)
Control: retitle -1 gnome-software: GNOME Software fails to remove packages
to satisfy dependencies (backport request)
37 matches
Mail list logo
