Bug#1104198: RFS: golf/479-1 [ITP] -- programming language for web services

2025-05-04 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 27.04.25 09:27, Golf Team wrote: Hello, Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [wishlist] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "golf": * Package name : golf Version : 479-1 I evaluated version 501. - there is no need to declare a BD libcurl4 (is

Bug#1097988: texlive-bin: ftbfs with GCC-15

2025-05-02 Thread Hilmar Preuße
build failures see the porting guide at http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-15/porting_to.html My upstream noted that there is a difference between "i.e. -std=gnu23 vs -std=c23. I guess that -std=gnu23 is the easy way." What standard is expected to be fulfilled? Hilmar -- Testmail OpenPGP_sig

Bug#1103893: Please switch to libpdfbox2-java

2025-05-02 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/bastien-roucaries/latex-pax/issues/8 On 22.04.25 16:26, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Hello, Your package build-depends on libpdfbox-java, which is a long EOLed version with open security issues of what is packaged as libpdfbox2-java for the current release

Bug#1103893: Please switch to libpdfbox2-java

2025-05-01 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/bastien-roucaries/latex-pax/issues/8 On 22.04.25 16:26, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Hello, Your package build-depends on libpdfbox-java, which is a long EOLed version with open security issues of what is packaged as libpdfbox2-java for the current releas

Bug#1083279: biber: can't build debian-package-book-* with pbuilder anymore because aof missing dependency

2025-05-01 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 03.10.24 21:17, Mechtilde Stehmann wrote: Hello Mechtilde, While updating the package 'debian-package-book-*" https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-team/dpb I strumple about the following problem. Is that issue still present? H. -- Testmail OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital

Bug#1103801: Additional public reference

2025-04-30 Thread Hilmar Preusse
Control: tags -1 + help On 28.04.25 Shang-Hung, Wan (a24230...@gmail.com) wrote: Hello, > I think they only patched the mitigation in Moodle, not MimeTex itself. [1] > Yes, correct. > And about the 1.77 source code, I can’t find souce other than > Moodle’s this issue ticket so far. > Maybe I'

Bug#1103981: proftpd-core: Does not start with default configuration (unknown configuration directive 'ShowSymlinks')

2025-04-30 Thread Hilmar Preusse
pd-dfsg_1.3.8.c+dfsg-4.dsc -rw-r--r-- 1 hille42 hille42 1417 Apr 29 20:23 proftpd-dfsg_1.3.8.c+dfsg-4_source.changes -rw-r--r-- 1 hille42 hille42 19446032 Dec 13 21:52 proftpd-dfsg_1.3.8.c+dfsg.orig.tar.gz Feel free to rebuild. If you need a git repo, please go to [1], choose branch trixie. Hilm

Bug#1103981: proftpd-core: Does not start with default configuration (unknown configuration directive 'ShowSymlinks')

2025-04-29 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 28.04.25 David Prévot (da...@tilapin.org) wrote: > On 28/04/2025 00:02, Hilmar Preusse wrote: Hello David, > > I built the proftpd-core_1.3.8.c+dfsg-3 for Debian stable, then > > purged the proftpd installation on my server and installed the custom > > packages. The ser

Bug#1103981: proftpd-core: Does not start with default configuration (unknown configuration directive 'ShowSymlinks')

2025-04-28 Thread Hilmar Preusse
l message seems to be “fatal: unknown configuration > directive 'ShowSymlinks' on line 26 of '/etc/proftpd/proftpd.conf'”. > I'm raising the severity of the issue for now. I hope, I'll find time to work on the issue. Hilmar signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1104307: vflib3 FTCBFS: hard codes the build architecture pkg-config

2025-04-28 Thread Hilmar Preusse
ls. > I've applied the patch to the repo for now. Unfortunately the build fails: Disabled the TrueType1 font driver ./configure: line 5538: syntax error near unexpected token `FREETYPE2,freetype2' ./configure: line 5538: ` PKG_CHECK_MODULES(FREETYPE2,freetype2)'

Bug#1103981: proftpd-core: Does not start with default configuration (unknown configuration directive 'ShowSymlinks')

2025-04-27 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 24.04.25 David Prevot (dpre...@evolix.fr) wrote: > On 2025-04-23 23:42, Hilmar Preuße wrote: Hello, > > I'm wondering if the three modules mod_delay, mod_ls and mod_xfer are > > loaded in your file /etc/proftpd/modules.conf > > No they were not: adding those thr

Bug#1103801: Additional public reference

2025-04-27 Thread Hilmar Preusse
abilities: > 🔗 https://github.com/TaiYou-TW/CVE-2024-40445_CVE-2024-40446 > > Please feel free to reach out if you need any further information. > I still don't know how to find the fix for the issue. The upstream homepage is gone and I'm not convinced that [1] contains

Bug#1104198: RFS: golf/479-1 [ITP] -- programming language for web services

2025-04-27 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 27.04.25 Phil Wyett (philip.wy...@kathenas.org) wrote: > On Sun, 2025-04-27 at 00:27 -0700, Golf Team wrote: Hello, > > Package: sponsorship-requests > > Severity: normal [wishlist] > > > > Dear mentors, > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "golf": > > > > * Package name : golf

Bug#1103981: proftpd-core: Does not start with default configuration (unknown configuration directive 'ShowSymlinks')

2025-04-23 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Hello, I'm wondering if the three modules mod_delay, mod_ls and mod_xfer are loaded in your file /etc/proftpd/modules.conf Hilmar 23.04.2025 15:06:10 David Prévot : > Package: proftpd-core > Version: 1.3.8.c+dfsg-3 > Severity: important > > Dear Maintainer, > >

Bug#1103154: proftpd-core: modules mod_ls and mod_xfer are not compiled in core

2025-04-17 Thread Hilmar Preusse
features are there. And yes, you are right: I could have added the "LoadModule " statements into the /etc/proftpd/modules.conf file to make sure the features are available, even after the upgrade (users may later disable them). Let me know, if I should implement this. Hilmar > Tri

Bug#1102994: tex-common: Upgrade failure from bookworm to trixie

2025-04-15 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 14.04.25 Hilmar Preusse (hill...@web.de) wrote: > On 13.04.25 Rainer Dorsch (m...@bokomoko.de) wrote: Hello, > > yes, here it is > > > > https://bokomoko.de/~rd/Debian/upgrade-trixie-step.script > > > > I did an apt upgrade and then full-upgrade even t

Bug#1102994: tex-common: Upgrade failure from bookworm to trixie

2025-04-14 Thread Hilmar Preusse
uce the issue, when doing texlive-full upgrade from Debian stable to testing. The file [1] from new context-modules package, does not seem to be processable by the old texlive-binaries package. So, I have to make sure, that texlive-binaries is up to date, before context-modules is upgraded. Hilmar

Bug#1102994: tex-common: Upgrade failure from bookworm to trixie

2025-04-13 Thread Hilmar Preusse
pgraded. And indeed this is how it is written in the release notes, although I've never done it this way. However I'm still wondering, why xetex and pdftex stop working in generating format files after these packages were upgraded. Hilmar signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1102994: tex-common: Upgrade failure from bookworm to trixie

2025-04-13 Thread Hilmar Preusse
-binaries should have been upgraded too, to the trixie version. Do you have a full upgrade log (screen log) at hand? Hilmar signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#760387: dvi2ps: FTBFS with clang instead of gcc

2025-04-04 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 03.09.14 Nicolas Sévelin-Radiguet (nic...@free.fr) wrote: > The attached patch fixes it. Buildlogs and patch are here: > https://github.com/nonas/debian-clang/tree/master/buildlogs/dvi2ps > > (void)fseek(fntfp, pl+3, SEEK_CUR); > - return; > + return NULL; > } >

Bug#1100497: blahtexml: diff for NMU version 0.9-1.2

2025-04-04 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 14.03.25 Emanuele Rocca (e...@debian.org) wrote: Hello, > I've prepared an NMU for blahtexml (versioned as 0.9-1.2) and > uploaded it to DELAYED/10. Please feel free to tell me if I > should delay it longer. > Now, that the NMU is in the archive I guess we can close the bug. I have a copy of

Bug#760387: dvi2ps: FTBFS with clang instead of gcc

2025-03-31 Thread Hilmar Preusse
gcc spits the same message, but there it is just a warning. The bug report is still valid. Hilmar signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#760387: dvi2ps: FTBFS with clang instead of gcc

2025-03-28 Thread Hilmar Preusse
er/buildlogs/dvi2ps > While working on recovering the dvi2ps package we tried to apply your patch, but noticed that it does not compile using GGC 14 after application. Is the request still valid? Hilmar signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1101293: dvi2ps: ftbfs with GCC-15

2025-03-25 Thread Hilmar Preusse
build with gcc-14/g++-14. The severity of this report will be raised before the forky release. The build log is attached. Hilmar -- System Information: Debian Release: 12.10 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, &#

Bug#1094598: RFS: bibtexconv/1.4.0-1

2025-03-18 Thread Hilmar Preusse
results - - - - - - - - - - 10-bibtexconv-html FAIL non-zero exit status 1 autopkgtest [09:14:03]: summary 10-bibtexconv-html FAIL non-zero exit status 1 11-bibtexconv-txtPASS 20-bibtexconv-odtPASS As already explained you need to add python3-minimal to the dep of your t

Bug#1094598: RFS: bibtexconv/1.4.0-1

2025-03-15 Thread Hilmar Preusse
not solve the issues I complained about: incomplete autopkg test suite / weird file content in debian/ . Are you still interested in getting a sponsor? Please fix the findings and drop a notification here. Hilmar signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1099851: ITS: dvi2ps

2025-03-09 Thread Hilmar Preuße
s not make sense to recover dvi2ps. Hilmar -- Testmail OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1097659: proftpd-mod-tar: ftbfs with GCC-15

2025-03-05 Thread Hilmar Preusse
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/Castaglia/proftpd-mod_tar/issues/11 On 17.02.25 Matthias Klose (d...@debian.org) wrote: > [This bug is NOT targeted to the upcoming trixie release] > > Please keep this issue open in the bug tracker for the package it > was filed for. If a fix in another

Bug#1097656: proftpd-mod-case: ftbfs with GCC-15

2025-03-04 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/Castaglia/proftpd-mod_case/issues/12 On 17.02.25 18:46, Matthias Klose wrote: Hello, Please keep this issue open in the bug tracker for the package it was filed for. If a fix in another package is required, please file a bug for the other package (or c

Bug#1097656: proftpd-mod-case: ftbfs with GCC-15

2025-03-04 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/Castaglia/proftpd-mod_case/issues/12 On 17.02.25 18:46, Matthias Klose wrote: Hello, Please keep this issue open in the bug tracker for the package it was filed for. If a fix in another package is required, please file a bug for the other package (or

Bug#1085120: ghostscript: gs generates invalid PDF files on armel

2025-03-04 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 26.11.24 00:00, Hilmar Preusse wrote: Hello, Extension error: Could not import extension sphinxcontrib.googleanalytics (exception: No module named 'sphinxcontrib.googleanalytics') make[1]: *** [debian/rules:63: execute_after_dh_auto_build-indep] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving direct

Bug#1096338: asymptote: ftbfs with GCC-15

2025-03-02 Thread Hilmar Preusse
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/kuafuwang/LspCpp/issues/56 On 17.02.25 Matthias Klose (d...@debian.org) wrote: > Package: src:asymptote > Version: 2.95+ds-1 > Severity: important > Tags: sid forky > User: debian-...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-15 > > [This bug is NOT targeted

Bug#1099134: update-texmf.8: Some remarks and a patch with editorial changes for this man page

2025-03-01 Thread Hilmar Preusse
Control: merge 1088249 -1 On 28.02.25 Bjarni Ingi Gislason (bjarn...@simnet.is) wrote: > Package: tex-common > Version: 6.18 > Severity: minor > Tags: patch > Was already reported. Merging. H. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1098282: RFS: forwords/1.0.2-1 [ITP] -- simple and effective tool to learn foreign words

2025-02-28 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 18.02.25 Hilmar Preusse (hill...@web.de) wrote: > On 18.02.25 Alexander Fomin (fomin_a...@yahoo.com) wrote: Hi, > > To access further information about this package, please visit the following > > URL: > > > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/forwords/ >

Bug#1097655: proftpd-mod-clamav: ftbfs with GCC-15

2025-02-28 Thread Hilmar Preusse
ed on, or new/dropped symbols in Debian symbols files. > For other C/C++ related build failures see the porting guide at > http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-15/porting_to.html > Forwarded for now. Hilmar signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1094898: context: mtxrun running fails

2025-02-23 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 01.02.25 Damir R. Islamov (da...@secretlaboratory.ru) wrote: Hello, > context cannot be installed due to error: > ... > Running mktexlsr. This may take some time... done. > Running mtxrun --generate. This may take some time... > mtxrun --generate failed. Output has been stored in > /tmp/mtxru

Bug#1098775: bullseye-pu: package proftpd-dfsg/1.3.7a+dfsg-12+deb11u4

2025-02-23 Thread Hilmar Preusse
: #1090813). + "Downloading a file contains the contents of another file." + + -- Hilmar Preuße Sun, 16 Feb 2025 23:41:13 +0100 + proftpd-dfsg (1.3.7a+dfsg-12+deb11u3) bullseye-security; urgency=medium * LTS Team upload diff -Nru proftpd-dfsg-1.3.7a+dfsg/debian/control prof

Bug#1036873: Don't Depend on transitional package ghostscript-x

2025-02-23 Thread Hilmar Preusse
containing just the fix for that dep to the "delayed 15 days queue" and informed the maintainer about this. Hilmar signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1094898: context: mtxrun running fails

2025-02-23 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 01.02.25 Damir R. Islamov (da...@secretlaboratory.ru) wrote: Hello, > Dear Maintainer, > > context cannot be installed due to error: > ... > Running mktexlsr. This may take some time... done. > Running mtxrun --generate. This may take some time... > mtxrun --generate failed. Output has been

Bug#1098645: texinfo: src:sbcl FTBFS: /usr/bin/texi2dvi: 713: cd: can't cd to asdf.t2d/dvi/bak

2025-02-22 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 22.02.25 06:52, Sean Whitton wrote: Hello Sean, It looks like the texinfo now in sid causes src:sbcl in sid to FTBFS. I'm filing a bug against texinfo because the output suggests that the problem is there, but perhaps src:sbcl is the place where changes are needed. Here's the tail of the bu

Bug#1098418: RFS: plog/1.1.10-1 [ITP] - C++ header-only logging library

2025-02-22 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 22.02.25 09:25, Sébastien Noel wrote: Control: tags -1 -moreinfo Hi, On 21/02/25 22:07, Phil Wyett wrote: Control: tags -1 +moreinfo [...] I used to find value in your reviews, but i'm doubtful with this one... The package pass all your tests but you conclude that it "is not yet ready"

Bug#1094857: ITS: dvipng

2025-02-21 Thread Hilmar Preusse
erved. Original code by Christoph Lameter. This program comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. You are free to redistribute this code under the terms of the GNU General Public License, version 2 or later. Bug in more recent versions of uscan? Hilmar signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1098287: RFS: freedict-wikdict

2025-02-20 Thread Hilmar Preusse
hours, I'm pretty sure there are more powerful boxes outside. I'll upload ASAP. Hilmar P.S.: the links on your home page should probably better point to the tracker pages https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/freedict-tools & https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/freedict-wikdict signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1098287: RFS: freedict-wikdict

2025-02-20 Thread Hilmar Preusse
://ftp-master.debian.org/dm.txt > > You will also see other packages that you have upload rights for. > If his source package builds another (new) binary package it has to go through the new queue, which he can't trigger if he's just a DM. So he needs a sponsor. Hilmar signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1096437: cjk: ftbfs with GCC-15

2025-02-20 Thread Hilmar Preusse
Control: tags -1 + pending patch On 17.02.25 Matthias Klose (d...@debian.org) wrote: Hello, > The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 with > gcc-15/g++-15, but succeeds to build with gcc-14/g++-14. The > severity of this report will be raised before the forky release. >

Bug#1092427: latex-cjk-chinese-arphic: FTBFS: dh_install: error: missing files, aborting

2025-02-19 Thread Hilmar Preusse
gument "-j1" in "pbuilder" or > "debuild" to only allow a single thread to work on building the > package, until I have found the culprit. > Thanks for that. After setting NUMJOBS to 1 in the d/rules file the build works again. I would accept that as solution. Sho

Bug#1096437: cjk: ftbfs with GCC-15

2025-02-19 Thread Hilmar Preusse
resented to the end user I won't accept that solution. Did you try to contact Werner Lemberg (author of cjk)? If he does not answer, we could try to fix that ourself or ask for help. As said: the issue is not urgent. Hilmar signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1098282: RFS: forwords/1.0.2-1 [ITP] -- simple and effective tool to learn foreign words

2025-02-18 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 18.02.25 Alexander Fomin (fomin_a...@yahoo.com) wrote: Hi, > To access further information about this package, please visit the following > URL: > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/forwords/ > 1. Did you have a look at that URL, it reports some errors, which could be fixed. 2. Did you

Bug#1097654: proftpd-dfsg: ftbfs with GCC-15

2025-02-18 Thread Hilmar Preusse
Control: tags -1 + fixed-upstream On 17.02.25 Matthias Klose (d...@debian.org) wrote: Hello, > The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 with > gcc-15/g++-15, but succeeds to build with gcc-14/g++-14. The > severity of this report will be raised before the forky release. >

Bug#1096150: ITP: forwords -- A very simple but effective tool to learn foreign language words

2025-02-16 Thread Hilmar Preusse
rogramming Lang: C++ > Description : A very simple but effective tool to learn foreign > language > words > Sounds interesting for now. To get a sponsor for the upload, please file a RFS bug. However having a short look, the package does need some improvements, before it can be upl

Bug#1096156: RM: asymptote [armel armhf] -- ROM; Package does not build on some arches

2025-02-16 Thread Hilmar Preusse
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: remove X-Debbugs-Cc: asympt...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:asymptote Due to a bug in ghostscript (#1085120) it is currently not possible to build that package on armel and armhf in trixie

Bug#1094898: context: mtxrun running fails

2025-02-09 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 08.02.25 Arthur Marsh (arthur.ma...@internode.on.net) wrote: Hello, > could the bug actually be in the dynamic linking process? > > I was using binutils 2.41-1. > Could you try building and linking with libmimalloc from testing? Let me know if I should provide new packa

Bug#1095041: ITP sphinxcontrib-googleanalytics -- Google Analytics extension for Sphinx

2025-02-09 Thread Hilmar Preusse
Package: wnpp Followup-For: Bug #1095041 Owner: Hilmar Preuße X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org In the meantime I've packaged the extension myself and intend to upload. The package is on salsa in the Python Team Space. Hilmar signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1094898: context: mtxrun running fails

2025-02-08 Thread Hilmar Preuße
malloc, we (luametatex) just suffer from the bug. Hilmar -- Testmail OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1093247: texlive-extra: Migration blocker

2025-02-08 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 08.02.25 09:49, Bastian Germann wrote: On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 23:08:47 +0100 Hilmar Preusse wrote: Hello, the package should not migrate to testing for now. Can you please explain why? This is blocking mupdf from migrating as well. I would like to see tl-base, tl-extra & tl-lan

Bug#1095407: Merge

2025-02-07 Thread Hilmar Preusse
Control: merge -1 1095404 signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#972692: dvipng: Security - Floating point exception

2025-02-07 Thread Hilmar Preusse
nding/dvipng). > I've fowarded the issue to upstream and got an answer: According to upstream the issue should have been solved (somehow) in version 1.18. I've put packages for amd64 here [1] . Could you test? I wasn't able to reproduce exactly this issue on arm64. Hilmar [1] http

Bug#1094898: context: mtxrun running fails

2025-02-05 Thread Hilmar Preusse
Running mtxrun --generate. This may take some time... done. > Running updmap-sys. This may take some time... done. > Running mktexlsr /var/lib/texmf ... done. > Building format(s) --all. > ... > Thanks for calling back. I reassign that issue to luametatex now and bump the severit

Bug#1094898: context: mtxrun running fails

2025-02-04 Thread Hilmar Preusse
Control: block -1 by 1094881 On 02.02.25 Kip Warner (k...@thevertigo.com) wrote: > On Sat, 2025-02-01 at 23:54 +0100, Hilmar Preuße wrote: Hello, > > My one was just a a try too. The luametatex package (as it is) is now > > in the Debian archive for about 0,5 years and seems t

Bug#1091292: asymptote: FTBFS on armhf: make[4]: *** [Makefile:14: hatch.png] Error 1

2025-02-03 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 23.12.24 Hilmar Preusse (hill...@web.de) wrote: > On 23.12.24 Lucas Nussbaum (lu...@debian.org) wrote: Hi Lucas, > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to > > build on armhf. > > > > This package currently has binary packages on armhf,

Bug#1094857: ITS: dvipng

2025-02-03 Thread Hilmar Preusse
packages to Salsa, as it's a great way to familiarize newcomers with a > consistent Git-based workflow. > Thanks for building a repository out of the source package; I'll start committing (if needed). Hilmar signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1095041: RFP: sphinxcontrib-googleanalytics -- Google Analytics extension for Sphinx

2025-02-02 Thread Hilmar Preusse
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: sphinxcontrib-googleanalytics Version : 0.4 Upstream Contact: Domen Kožar * URL : https://github.com/sphinx-contrib/googleanalytics * License : BSD-3-Clause license Programming Lang: Python Description :

Bug#972692: dvipng: Security - Floating point exception

2025-02-02 Thread Hilmar Preusse
file, like so: dvipng -x 1000 crash.dvi This will work in previous versions too. I'm not sure, which version he's speaking about, I guess 1.18. Hilmar signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1094898: context: mtxrun running fails

2025-02-01 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 01.02.25 18:55, Kip Warner wrote: On Sat, 2025-02-01 at 18:46 +0100, Hilmar Preuße wrote: Hi Kip, I was afraid, that something like this could happen. On [1] I've put a luametatex package, which is linked statically with mimalloc. Could you try if it solves your issue? Hilmar, j

Bug#1094898: context: mtxrun running fails

2025-02-01 Thread Hilmar Preuße
file if you report a bug. $ sudo cat /tmp/mtxrun.2M4VZ7Yl Illegal instruction (core dumped) I was afraid, that something like this could happen. On [1] I've put a luametatex package, which is linked statically with mimalloc. Could you try if it solves your issue? Hilmar [1]

Bug#1094598: RFS: bibtexconv/1.4.0-1

2025-01-31 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 29.01.25 Hilmar Preuße (hill...@web.de) wrote: > On 29.01.25 10:16, Thomas Dreibholz wrote: Hello Thomas, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bibtexconv > www.nntb.no/~dreibh/bibtexconv/>": > > > > dget -xhttps://mentors.deb

Bug#1094598: RFS: bibtexconv/1.4.0-1

2025-01-30 Thread Hilmar Preusse
u run your usual test suite and post the results? Many thanks, Hilmar signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1091785: pdfjam.1: Some remarks and a patch with editorial changes for this man page

2025-01-29 Thread Hilmar Preusse
> page" > The patch was applied upstream [1]. Tagging. Hilmar [1] https://github.com/pdfjam/pdfjam/commit/d9f4395ae2146870c54a74ae91261852e5b5c101 signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1036873: Don't Depend on transitional package ghostscript-x

2025-01-27 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Control: severity -1 grave On 27.01.25 19:44, Hilmar Preusse wrote: Package: gv Version: 1:3.7.4-2 Followup-For: Bug #1036873 Control: severity -1 grave -- Testmail OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1036873: Don't Depend on transitional package ghostscript-x

2025-01-27 Thread Hilmar Preusse
Package: gv Version: 1:3.7.4-2 Followup-For: Bug #1036873 Control: severity -1 grave The ghostscript package stopped providing ghostscript-x [1], hence gv is currently uninstallable in trixie. If you need help let me know. Hilmar [1] https://salsa.debian.org/debian/ghostscript/-/commit

Bug#1093957: ITS: latexila

2025-01-26 Thread Hilmar Preusse
The application was previously named LaTeXila and then GNOME LaTeX." I guess you will rename after the ITS was successful. Hilmar [1] https://gitlab.gnome.org/swilmet/enter-tex signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1093957: ITS: latexila

2025-01-26 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 26.01.25 Andreas Tille (ti...@debian.org) wrote: > Am Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 11:10:50PM +0100 schrieb Hilmar Preuße: Hello, > > No, that's fine with me. I just wanted to clarify your > > expectations to our group. As you noticed I've added a few more > > comm

Bug#1093957: ITS: latexila

2025-01-25 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 25.01.25 23:24, Jeremy Bícha wrote: Hello, Could I be added to Uploaders for latexila and given Salsa permissions for it? My username is jbicha I've sent you an invitation. You should be able yourself do commits to the repo. Hilmar -- Testmail OpenPGP_signature.asc Descri

Bug#1093957: ITS: latexila

2025-01-25 Thread Hilmar Preuße
s you noticed I've added a few more commits to glosstex; we should have done that before upload... ;-( Hilmar -- Testmail OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1093214: luametatex needs to be rebuild

2025-01-25 Thread Hilmar Preusse
Control: block -1 by 1094177 On 16.01.25 Hilmar Preusse (hill...@web.de) wrote: > On 16.01.25 Damir R. Islamov (da...@secretlaboratory.ru) wrote: Hi Damir, > > $ ldd /usr/bin/luametatex > > linux-vdso.so.1 (0x7f08df695000) > > libmimalloc.so.2 => not found &

Bug#1094177: transition: luametatex

2025-01-25 Thread Hilmar Preusse
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition The mimalloc package recently performed an API change and recently uploaded a package having the correct name. Please trigger a binNMU for luametatex to fix the dependency. Ben file: ti

Bug#1093957: ITS: latexila

2025-01-24 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 24.01.25 Hilmar Preuße (hill...@web.de) wrote: > On 24.01.25 10:17, Andreas Tille wrote: Hello Andreas, > > I'm interested in salvaging your package latexila, in accordance with > > the Package Salvaging procedure outlined in the Developers Reference[1]. > > Your

Bug#1093957: ITS: latexila

2025-01-24 Thread Hilmar Preuße
ing to join us? Nüscht für ungut. Hilmar -- Testmail OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1093368: yosys: Patch

2025-01-22 Thread Hilmar Preusse
nded result, but at least a buildably TeX file. Hilmar -- System Information: Debian Release: 12.9 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: arm64 (aarch64) Foreign Architectures: armhf

Bug#1093732: texlive-base: Should not migrate to testing

2025-01-21 Thread Hilmar Preusse
Source: texlive-base Version: 2024.20250114-1 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software Dear Maintainer, the package should not migrate to testing for now. Hilmar -- System Information: Debian Release: 12.9 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-up

Bug#1093682: recommonmark: Test suite fails with latest TeX Live upload

2025-01-21 Thread Hilmar Preusse
. The easiest solution for you should be to add package lmodern to the Dep of your test suite (I did not test this, but I'm convinced that it solves the issue). Hilmar -- System Information: Debian Release: 12.9 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates')

Bug#1093388: texlive-xetex: XeLaTeX fails to build with \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}

2025-01-19 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 19.01.25 Hilmar Preusse (hill...@web.de) wrote: > On 17.01.25 Hilmar Preusse (hill...@web.de) wrote: Hi, > > after the latest upload of texlive-base a TeX file using > > \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} can't be compiled any more using XeLaTeX: > > > >

Bug#1093388: texlive-xetex: XeLaTeX fails to build with \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}

2025-01-19 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 17.01.25 Hilmar Preusse (hill...@web.de) wrote: Hi, > after the latest upload of texlive-base a TeX file using > \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} can't be compiled any more using XeLaTeX: > > \documentclass[a4paper]{article} > \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} > > \begin{docum

Bug#1092062: pod2texi.1: Some remarks about this man page

2025-01-18 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 08.01.25 09:17, Hilmar Preusse wrote: On 07.01.25 Bjarni Ingi Gislason (bjarn...@simnet.is) wrote: Hello, I do not use this generator. Me neither. However it is always wrong to modify a file, which is generated...unless the statement (that it is generated) is wrong. I can't be

Bug#1093388: texlive-xetex: XeLaTeX fails to build with \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}

2025-01-17 Thread Hilmar Preusse
begin{document} iii \end{document} Log file is attached. Hilmar -- System Information: Debian Release: 12.9 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: arm64 (aarch64) Foreign Architectures:

Bug#1085120: ghostscript: Status request

2025-01-17 Thread Hilmar Preusse
ke to release it in the current status. Thanks, Hilmar -- System Information: Debian Release: 12.9 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: arm64 (aarch64) Foreign Architectures: armhf Ker

Bug#1093214: luametatex needs to be rebuild

2025-01-16 Thread Hilmar Preusse
Control: block -1 by 1092330 signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1093214: luametatex needs to be rebuild

2025-01-16 Thread Hilmar Preusse
92330 ff.). After libmimalloc3.0 exists I can test if luametatext works with that version and then trigger an binNMU. Sorry, to say, but currently the only thing you can do is to downgrade libmimalloc2.0 and put it on hold. apt-listbugs could be helpful with pinning. Hilmar signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1093251: texlive-lang: Migration blocker

2025-01-16 Thread Hilmar Preusse
Source: texlive-lang Version: 2024.20250114-1 Severity: grave Dear Maintainer, the package should not migrate to testing for now. Hilmar -- System Information: Debian Release: 12.9 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security&#

Bug#1093247: texlive-extra: Migration blocker

2025-01-16 Thread Hilmar Preusse
Control: severity -1 grave On 16.01.25 Hilmar Preusse (hill...@web.de) wrote: > Source: texlive-extra > Version: 2024.20250114-1 > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > > the package should not migrate to testing for now. > Has to be severity RC. H. signat

Bug#1093247: texlive-extra: Migration blocker

2025-01-16 Thread Hilmar Preusse
Source: texlive-extra Version: 2024.20250114-1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, the package should not migrate to testing for now. Hilmar -- System Information: Debian Release: 12.9 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security&#

Bug#1092973: RFS: check/0.15.2-3 -- unit test framework for C

2025-01-13 Thread Hilmar Preusse
ines vanished, but they were replaced by same lines, but w/o typo. This is mentioned in d/changelog. Hilmar signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1092962: ffmpeg: FTBFS with TeXInfo 7.2

2025-01-13 Thread Hilmar Preusse
y I have no time frame for uploading TeXInfo 7.2 to unstable, but if that bug will become RC. Hilmar [1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-texinfo/2024-12/msg00081.html -- System Information: Debian Release: 12.9 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates&#

Bug#1092959: check: FTBFS with Upcoming TeXInfo 7.2

2025-01-13 Thread Hilmar Preusse
ference to nonexistent `Conclusion and References' , which clearly points to a syntax error in the check.texi (not sure, why TeXInfo 7.1.1 not even warns). Attached is a patch, which solves the issue. Currently I have no time frame for uploading TeXInfo 7.2 to unstable, but if that bug will bec

Bug#1092062: pod2texi.1: Some remarks about this man page

2025-01-08 Thread Hilmar Preusse
Control: tags -1 - wontfix On 07.01.25 Bjarni Ingi Gislason (bjarn...@simnet.is) wrote: > On Sun, Jan 05, 2025 at 11:49:06PM +0100, Hilmar Preuße wrote: > > On 04.01.25 10:45, Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote: Hello, > I do not use this generator. > Me neither. However it is

Bug#1092330: tex-common fail to configure with libmimalloc2.0/sid (providing only libmimalloc.3)

2025-01-07 Thread Hilmar Preusse
Control: block -1 by 1092293 On 07.01.25 Grégory Mounié (greg...@kiowa.imag.fr) wrote: Hello, > tex-common fail to configure with libmimalloc2.0/sid that provide only > libmimalloc.so.3.0 > > error file produce by the configuration: > root@kiowa:~# cat /tmp/mtxrun.ETU2uklV > mtxrun: error while

Bug#1092293: mimalloc: Change of soname not shown in package name

2025-01-06 Thread Hilmar Preusse
make packages (using that lib) aware of the change. Thanks, Hilmar -- System Information: Debian Release: 12.8 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: arm64 (aarch64) Foreign Archite

Bug#1092062: pod2texi.1: Some remarks about this man page

2025-01-05 Thread Hilmar Preuße
e blame the generator. Tagging wontfix for now. Hilmar -- Testmail

Bug#1091785: pdfjam.1: Some remarks and a patch with editorial changes for this man page

2025-01-02 Thread Hilmar Preuße
e.g. if it were a standard part of the GNU build system. > The lintian quality checker has already some kind of checking for manual pages, but this could (probably) be extended. I'll keep this in mind, but the lintian people have a heavy workload too, so don't expect automate

Bug#1091785: pdfjam.1: Some remarks and a patch with editorial changes for this man page

2025-01-02 Thread Hilmar Preuße
(years if one is unlucky). So directly speaking to the upstream author raises drastically the chance that you have a fix soon. Hilmar has already forwarded the patches to our upstream, which is TeX Live. And they take what their upstream authors provide. Let me know if this was the wrong way to

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >