Package: texlive-latex-extra
Version: 2024.20241115-1
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
Dear Maintainer,
The following program :
=
\documentclass[12pt]{article}
% \usepackage[default]{fontsetup}
% \usepackage[olddefault]{font
Package: texlive
Version: 2024.20241115-1
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
TeXLive include several "font-oriented" packages installing Truetype/Opentype
fonts, which may be useful to other applications. Some examples : Fira fonts,
New Computer Modern fonts (and then some), some language-specif
Package: libgdal35
Version: 3.9.0+dfsg-1
Followup-For: Bug #1070852
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
(Manually) upgrading the spdep and spatial R packages failed, for lack of
libgdal.so.34, which *
This bug is a *duplicate* of
[https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1070887](https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1070887)
: the `reportbug` output led me to believe had *not* been submitted (and the
acknowledgement was late), so I restarted `reportbug` and configured it
Package: libreoffice-base
Version: 4:24.2.3-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
Setup : Debian testing running on core i7 + 16 GB RAM, *updated daily.*
I use libreoffice-base to update *daily* a small sqlite database accessed via
an ODBC link.
This setup has been stable for more than 3
Package: libreoffice-base
Version: 4:24.2.3-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
Setup : Debian testing running on core i7 + 16 GB RAM, *updated daily.*
I use libreoffice-base to update *daily* a small sqlite database accessed via
an ODBC link.
This setup has been stable for more than 3 years
Le samedi 02 septembre 2023 à 23:47 +0200, Preuße, Hilmar a écrit :
> Control: block -1 by 1050807
>
> On 02.09.2023 07:57, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where
> > appropriate ***
> >
&g
Package: tex-common
Version: 6.18
Followup-For: Bug #1041508
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
routine upgrade of testing's tex-common
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (o
Package: tex-common
Version: 6.18
Followup-For: Bug #1041508
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
routine upgrade of testing's tex-common
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (o
On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 23:54:09 -0500 Istiak Ferdous
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This looks fixed in upstream 4.0 by original maintainer. Yet to be
> packaged.
As of March 24, 2023, this does not appear to have been packaged.
Could you suggest a workaround ?
Sincerely,
Package: texlive-latex-recommended
Version: 2022.20220722-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
As installed by vanilla installation of texlive-full, \fontspec used with
XeLaTeX
doesn't find TrueType/Opentype "system" f
Package: texlive-latex-recommended
Version: 2022.20220722-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
As installed by vanilla installation of texlive-full, \fontspec used with
XeLaTeX
doesn't find TrueType/Opentype "system" f
Source: giac
Version: 1.7.0.39+dfsg2-1
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
A new upstream version has been released this month. Getting it packaged in
Debian could be useful ; I'm especially thinking of its increasing use in Sage,
where it is now a standard package.
-- System Information:
Debia
Package: python3
Version: 3.10.4-1+b1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
I maintain a Sagemath (https://www.sagemath.org/) installation for (small-time)
development purposes.
Since
For information : this bug has bitten me too :
I run testing, R (from testing), a bucketfull of R packages (mostly
from R repositories) and sagemath (installed from source).
Recently, the "energy" R packages started to be un-upgradable for lack
of libgsl.so.25.
No obvious solution in sight...
Package: libreoffice
Version: 1:7.2.4-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
* What led up to the situation?
A routine update of Debian testing (bookworm) on Jan 2, 2021 led to a situation
where clicking on LibreOffice's or LibreOffice apps' icons is ineffective ;
similarly
I have been bitten by this one, although in a slightly different
context (using Sage's Maxima). Symptoms identical : a very short TeX
file, sorely lacking any references to any LaTex package, and
systematic failure.
Any news ?
--
Emmanuel Charpentier
I have been bitten by this one, although in a slightly different
context (using Sage's Maxima). Symptoms identical : a very short TeX
file, sorely lacking any references to any LaTex package, and
systematic failure.
Any news ?
--
Emmanuel Charpentier
Package: libopenblas-dev
Version: 0.3.7+ds-5
Severity: normal
The installation of libopenblas and libopenblas-dev does not seem to allow the
normal use of openblasin a sn autotools-based source program.
A detailed example is documented in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/27870
starting at comment
Package: src:linux
Version: 5.2.17-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
I have intermittent losses of control of my X session, which gives the
following symptoms:
- mouse appears active (the cursor follows trackpad movements), but can't act
(trackpad taps and trackpad-corners click are ineffe
advertently
missing dependency, and that this plan would be useful to a lot of
people.
Thanks in advance !
--
Emmanuel Charpentier
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: codebraid
Version : 0.4.0
Upstream Author : Geoffrey Poore
* URL : https://github.com/gpoore/codebraid
* License : BSD 3-clause
Programming Lang: Python
Description : A pandoc wrapper enabling code execut
Package: texlive-extra-utils
Version: 2019.20190830-1
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
Geoffrey Poore has finalized a new version of pythontex this summer. This
version has been uploaded on CTAN on Sep 25, 2019.
Among other minor and not-so-minor fixes en enhancements, this version offers
co
Obviously :
sed -re "s/contrib/non-free/g"
HTH,
--
Emmanuel Charpentier
Package: emacs
Version: 1:26.1+1-2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
Upgrading to emacs 26 (currently from unstable) on a testing system
AND removing emacs25-common-non-dfsg
* W
It seems that the package httpuv has the same problem as brms...
HT?,
--
Emmanuel Charpentier
mmes MD5 vérifiées
** R
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::runtime_error'
what(): Mutex creation failed
Aborted
Les packages source téléchargés sont dans
‘/tmp/RtmpH946C3/downloaded_packages’
Warning message:
In install.packages("brms") :
l'installation du package ‘brms’ a eu un statut de sortie non nul
Back to the brute-force method...
HTH,
--
Emmanuel Charpentier
n nothing changes the
> package
> remains happy...
Some "interesting" R packages are not in Debian packaging of CRAN (some
aren't even on CRAN : I had to install some of them in order to
collaborate with Paul Buekner on a paper). So out-of-Debian may be a
(regrettable) necessity...
Cordially yours,
--
Emmanuel Charpentier
this as a bug against the r-base
> package. It
> appears to be a bystander here.
Indeed (with the proviso that I want to see that with R 3.5.1...).
But I wonder how many potential bystanders are in Debian, and what
measures should be taken to retrieve the real source of the proble
Le mardi 18 décembre 2018 à 07:34 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel a écrit :
> On 18 December 2018 at 14:21, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
> > Package: r-base
> > Version: 3.5.1.20181215-1
> > Severity: important
> >
[ Snip... ]
> There is nothing I can do for you here.
Package: r-base
Version: 3.5.1.20181215-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
Please note that I report this bug against r-base because this is where I got
the symptoms. However, I am almost certain that the problem is somewhere
in glibc (see below "Further note").
*** Reporter, please consider
Package: bluez
Version: 5.50-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Installing buster (dual boot) on an Asus UX370UA-C4237RB (AKA "Zenbook Flip" in
commercialese) laptop. All went well, but for
- one minor booboo (can't command the keyboard backlights via th
ld-infrastructure.
an no news since...
Is there any hope to get emacs 26.1 as, say, stockings filler ? Or as
turkey stuffing ?
--
Emmanuel Charpentier
Package: openjdk-9-jre
Version: 9.0.4+12-3
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I noticed that upgrading to Java 9, as testing recently did, hosed my (self-
compiled Sage installation : the jmol 3D viewer could not longer start, for
lack of a suitable Java installation : see
https://groups.google.co
ckaged for Debian ?
Sincerely,
--
Emmanuel Charpentier
-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (650, 'testing'), (60, 'unstable'), (50, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 4
ons :
- Zotero standalone can be used with Chrom{e|ium} and the
corresponding connector.
- At least as an interim measure, Debian users could use Zotero-
built connectors along with Debian-packaged Chromium and Firefox.
HTH,
--
Emmanuel Charpentier
> Any thoughts?
>
> [1] https://bugs.debian.org/877977
>
when booting
testing is 24x80, with a poor font (on a 22" 16/9 screen : yuck...).
Various attempts to set a better resolution in console have failed.
HTH,
--
Emmanuel Charpentier
Xorg.0.log-DebianLive9.gz
Description: application/gzip
, which is crappy due to X
being unable to pick up my monitor's specs from the hardware.
HTH,
--
Emmanuel Charpentier
Xorg.0.log.gz
Description: application/gzip
x synchronization until End-of-
> life
> of firefox 52 ESR (till June 26, 2018)?
This is *not* under our control : this functionality is controlled by
the Zotero server managers (and Zotero developpers). Ask *them* for
such a support (but, as I understand it, this would delay further
Zotero evolution).
--
Emmanuel Charpentier
I forgot to add that the simple workaround of blacklisting nouveau was
enough to obtain whet seems to be a stable system. The X session is now
VESA (a bit sluggish, but liveable...), and did not gave me guff until
now.
HTH,
I am in the process to rework an old machine, used as a (slow) server.
To make things simple, I installed Debian from an USB key of Debian
Live (Stretch), which worked okay, including Gnome.
Then I upgraded this system to buster (s/stretch/buster in
/etc/apt/source.list.d/*, then apt-get update ;
Source: zotero-standalone-build
Severity: wishlist
Tags: upstream
Dear Maintainer,
After about 1 year of gestation, Zotero 5.0 is out.
* It is standalone only.
* The Firefox interface is now implemented in a "Connector" (as it was always
the
casefor Chrom(e|ium).
* The internal format seems to
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: git-latexdiff
Version : v1.2.0-4-g1093032
Upstream Author : Matthieu Moy
* URL : https://gitlab.com/git-latexdiff/git-latexdiff
* License : Informal (see description below ; BSD as an alternative.
Programming L
Package: latexdiff
Version: 1.1.1-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
Trying to use latexdiff-git, I got :
$ latexdiff-git -r HEAD~1 Spectro1.
Package: maxima
Version: 5.38.1-6
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
The latest (5.38.1.6) version of the maxima* packages have no useable online
help.
Symptom : gibberish at the sart of a session (both in console or in emacs via
imaxima) :
===
. 1 14:00 /usr/share/emacs/site-
lisp/maxima/imaxima.lisp
HTH,
--
Emmanuel Charpentier
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (650, 'testing'), (60, 'unstable'), (50, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign
Information update. From the same emacs version :
(%i4) load("/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/maxima/imaxima.lisp");
(\%o4) \verb|/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/maxima/imaxima.lisp|
==> for some reason, "(load ...)" does not follow symlinks.
HTH,
--
Emmanuel Charpentier
299 nov. 1 14:00 /usr/share/emacs/site-
lisp/maxima/imaxima.lisp
Nothing relevant in my .emacs. Only maxila-related snippet is :
;; Pour (i)maxima
(setq imaxima-use-maxima-mode-flag t)
==> file path problems still exist.
HTH,
--
Emmanuel Charpentier
Package: gnome-shell-extensions
Version: 3.18.3-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Updating (apt-get upate ; apt-get dist-upgrade -u -f ) my testing installation
on 2016-01-27.
After boot on 2016-01-28), I saw that the "Applicatins menu" item (top left
corner
by larger
means (finding this bug is not obvious for pedestrian users like
me...).
Sincerely yours,
--
Emmanuel Charpentier
Package: libreoffice-dev
Version: 1:5.0.2-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
apt-get update # Then
apt-get dist-upgrade -u -f
results in a hung apt-get. From another terminal, ps axfw says :
[ ... ]
3143 pts/0S
Package: libtinfo5
Version: 6.0+20150810
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Upgrading a testing (stretch) system.
Since a recent upgrade, bash complains about this library lacking version
information.
the following message is printed a *lot* during some bash s
Package: zotero-standalone
Version: 4.0.26.2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Attempt to use zotero standalone in conjunction with Chromium.
I alredy attemped this in the past, but went back to Iceweasel and Zotero for
nce) ?
Super-bonus question : should this be regarded as a bug ?
Sincerely yours,
Emmanuel Charpentier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
,
Emmanuel Charpentier
Le dimanche 21 septembre 2014 à 09:20 +0200, Emmanuel Charpentier a
écrit :
> Dear Michael, dear list,
> Le samedi 20 septembre 2014 à 17:10 -0400, Michael Gilbert a écrit :
> > On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Emmanuel Charpentier wrot
Dear Michael, dear list,
Le samedi 20 septembre 2014 à 17:10 -0400, Michael Gilbert a écrit :
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
> > The installation runs normally. When starting Winword for the first time, it
> > aks for name and initial, then displays a
place of the old files fixes the
imaxima breakage.
Tentative conclusion : texlive is late on this package and/or has broken it.
Hence the "upstream" flag.
HTH,
--
Emmanuel Charpentier
-- Package-specific info:
IMPORTANT INFORMATION: We will only consider bug reports concerning
the p
2
(%i6)
Strictly the same problem.
HTH,
--
Emmanuel Charpentier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
allation (after purge) of the maxima packages.
* What was the outcome of this action?
Same situation.
* What outcome did you expect instead?
A working imaxima :-).
HTH,
-
Emmanuel Charpentier
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (650, &
Package: wine
Version: 1.6.2-8
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
This does not happens with Ubuntu packages of Wine 1.6.2 on an Ubuntu machine,
but happens with recent versions of the Debian (jessie) packaged version of
wine : I reproduced it on three Debian (jessie) machines.
The installation r
Package: iceweasel
Version: 29.0.1-2
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
Letting apt-get upgrade iceweasel to 29.0.1 rendered Zotero (original plugins :
zotero + libreoffice plugin integration) unusable : the plugin
Package: xul-ext-zotero
Version: 4.0.17-2
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
I'm using Zotero on a few machines (using Debian Jessie), synchronizing via the
Zotero site. I'm using
Package: wxmaxima
Version: 13.04.2-2
Followup-For: Bug #742988
As far as I can tell, on a french keyboard, the only character that can be
typed with AltGr is "~" : no brackets, no curly brackets, no caret, no at no
backslash, no pipe.
Ouch !
This renders any serious use of maxima impossible thro
Package: firmware-linux
Version: 0.41
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
Trying to purge and reinstall firmwares after my boot being messed up
b) from Wine's Acrobat Reader : all printing option wok as
advertised
c) from LibreOffice : ditto...
* What was the outcome of this action?
No duplex printing available... fron evince
* What outcome did you expect instead?
To be able to duplex-print from evince.
HTH,
Package: libatlas3-base
Version: 3.10.1-4+custom1
Severity: wishlist
* What led up to the situation?
Wishing to use local-system-optimized libaries for sage ithout havng to
recompile atlas every time.
As of version 6.1, sage claims to need libptcblas and libptf77blas, which are
compiled as *s
Package: libfreetype6
Version: 2.5.1-2
Severity: normal
Perusing upstream Web page (http://www.freetype.org/), I saw this on
the front page :
"FreeType 2.5.2 has been released. It fixes a serious bug introduced
in version 2.5.1; all users should upgrade."
The relevant log is :
"CHANGES BETWEEN 2
Package: maxima
Version: 5.30.0-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Following testing...
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
--
than a bootable
Debian USB key, damnit !). Could it be split (if possible in meaningful
units) ?
For image gluttons, an openclipart-png metapackage could be created. The
rest of us would still be able to postpone the financing of yet another
terabyte drive...
inistrator, just a bloody dentist/biostatistician (yes...)
that *uses* a computer in his everyday problem solving and *writing*.
This latter is a very important part of his work...
Emmanuel Charpentier
Le dimanche 04 décembre 2011 à 13:42 +0100, Matthias Klo
Package: java-common
Version: 0.45
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
Symptoms (end-user point of view) :
1) no more communication between LibreOffice an Zotero (3.0beta2) or Zotero
Standalone (ditto). A look at Zotero site suggested to switch to OpenJDK (I
also have sun's, as current default),
Package: evolution
Version: 3.0.3-2
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
Since 2011-10-20 update to evolution, I can retrieve mail from a pop3 server
but cannot read it : clicking on a message still displays the last message
displayed before update, double-clicking it retrieves a "blank" message,
GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: gdk_pixbuf_get_pixels: assertion
`GDK_IS_PIXBUF (pixbuf)' failed
Erreur de segmentation
charpent@SAP9060043:~$
Hope this helps to fix this (quite useful, but currently unusable)
package.
Emmanuel Charpentier
NB : this issues
Package: remmina
Version: 0.9.3-3
Severity: normal
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Since upgrade to 0.9.3-3, I no longer can use pre-existing or new VNC
connections : opening such a connection leads to a dialog box saying
"Reading password failed" and the OK button.
I have check
As said in the title, this morning's upgrade to linux-image2.6.38-2-686
to the 2.6.38-5 version *seems* to fix the reported bug (i. e. I can
again resume from hibernate and get back to my frozen session).
HTH,
Emmanuel Charpentier
--
To UNSUBS
I can give any further info as needed.
HTH,
Emmanuel Charentier
Emmanuel Charpentier
-- Package-specific info:
** Version:
Linux version 2.6.38-2-686 (Debian 2.6.38-3) (b...@decadent.org.uk) (gcc
version 4.4.5 (De
Le lundi 18 avril 2011 à 05:31 +0200, Marco d'Itri a écrit :
> On Apr 17, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
>
> > FYI, what I got installed via netinst was udev 671-1.
> 167-1 *is* buggy *if* you have /run.
> Currently you are not supposed to have /run on testing sistem, so
dev 671-1.
This bug is highly annoying, and will annoy a lot of people now that it
has found its way in testing : many of us peones tend to install testing
rather than the (almost always outdated) stable distribution.
HTH,
Emmanuel Charpentier
--
To U
eboot.
Other models may be pickier ?
HTH,
Emmanuel Charpentier
Le vendredi 01 avril 2011 à 15:03 +0200, Frédéric Boiteux a écrit :
> Hello Ben,
>
> I've run the 2.6.32-31 Debian kernel without the identified faulty
> patch
>
id|testing package ?
HTH,
Emmanuel Charpentier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
l" procedures to do so (any pointer to a
*synthetic* doc ? ) and somewhat reluctant to undertake this on a
netbook... :-).
Sincerely yours,
Emmanuel Charpentier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subje
yours,
Emmanuel Charpentier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Dear Michael,
Thank you for your reply.
Le jeudi 17 février 2011 à 09:57 +0100, Michael Biebl a écrit :
> Am 17.02.2011 09:50, schrieb Emmanuel Charpentier:
> > Package: pm-utils
> > Version: 1.3.0-3
> > Severity: important
> >
> > I installed testing about
und would be welcome.
Sincerely,
Emmanuel
Charpentier
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing-proposed-updates
APT policy: (500, 'testing-proposed-updates'), (500, 'testing')
Archite
Package: fwbuilder
Version: 4.1.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
libfwbuilder-4.1.0-1 depends on libflwbuilder-abi-4.1.0, which is a virtual
package provided by libfwbuilder9.
On a "testing" system, installing libfwbuilder9-4.1.1-1 is *not* recognized as
providing the s
necessary.
HTH,
Emmanuel
Charpentier
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing-proposed-updates
APT policy: (500, 'testing-proposed-updates'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (
update is needed)
Is there a mechanism allowing strongswan to be slipped under the freeze Iron
Curtain ?
Thanks in advance,
Emmanuel Charpentier
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing-proposed-updates
This post only to acknowledge that the fix proposed by Werner works (I
forgot to forward my answer to his mail to the DBTS).
Le mardi 04 mai 2010 à 22:18 +0200, Werner Baumann a écrit :
> If you remove the trailing slash from the mount point in /etc/fstab it
> should work (/home/charpent/alpha-da
setuidbit of the former and setting it for
the latter. To no avail.
I must have been either 1) doing something extremely stupid, or 2 ) dug up
a nice buglet. Could you please let me know which ?
Thanks in advance,
Emmanuel Charpentier
-- System Informati
backports
repositories.
Can someone suggest a workaround for squeeze users ? (No, I'd rather
*not* go for unstable. Been there, done that, got the T-shirt...).
Sincerely,
Emmanuel Charpentier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.de
sition from 7.x to 8.x "the
Debian way" would be welcome...
Sincerely,
Emmanuel Charpentier
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental'
The problem is indeed in /usr/share/opstgresql-common/supported-version.
The fix supplied by Richard renards works (Thank you, Richard !).
Il leave this bug open to remind the developpers...
Sincerely,
Emmanuel Charpentier
--
Emmanuel Charpentier
eturned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
postgresql-common
I'm stuck...
Sincerely,
Emmanuel Charpentier
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'
r, after a while without critical bugs,
the new "unstable" version.
Is there a stumbling block specific to testing ?
Are there plans to get this package back to testing ?
Sincerely,
Emmanuel Charpentier
-- System Information:
Debian Release: te
mailing lists.
Sincerely,
Emmanuel Charpentier
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12e
ut of Debian
per se).
Does experimental have a non-free section ? ISTR that yes, but not sure...
Any other way to get help (from a RPM, for example ?)
Sincerely yours,
Emmanuel Charpentier
--
Emmanuel Charpentier[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To
. openoffice.org2-help-*
would be even better, of course...
Are those package difficult to port ?
Emmanuel Charpentier
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental
I tried to build this kernel on a newer PIV. This dos *not* build with
gcc 4.0 or gcc 3.4, but *does* build with gcc 3.3
I'll try this on the target machine, and let you know.
--
Emmanuel Charpentier[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
e previous versions of Gnome.
So it seems to me that the upgrade process seriously munched something in my
config, which the current doc does not alliow me to find, guess or divine...
>From a end-user point of view, this is a quite serious problem :
- "RTFM" leads to no solution
ree
exists, and its continued existence has been voted not long ago). kqemu
would have to depend on qemu, but not the reverse !
- Source distribution : distribute the free sources in main and the
non-free kqemy source in non-free.
Or am I misunderstanding DFSG ?
Sincerely,
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
