Package: libatlas3-base
Version: 3.10.1-4+custom1
Severity: wishlist
* What led up to the situation?
Wishing to use local-system-optimized libaries for sage ithout havng to
recompile atlas every time.
As of version 6.1, sage claims to need libptcblas and libptf77blas, which are
compiled as *static* libraries but the current libatlas3-base 3.10.1-4
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
getting source of the latest (sid) atlas, compiling it and installing the
resultant packages.
* What was the outcome of this action?
Static versions of libptcblas and libptf77blas
* What outcome did you expect instead?
Idem + dynamic (.so) versions of libptcblas and libptf77blas
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (650, 'testing'), (500, 'testing-updates'), (500,
'testing-proposed-updates'), (60, 'unstable'), (55, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.12-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages libatlas3-base depends on:
ii libc6 2.17-97
ii libgcc1 1:4.8.2-14
ii libgfortran3 4.8.2-14
libatlas3-base recommends no packages.
Versions of packages libatlas3-base suggests:
ii liblapack3 3.5.0-2
-- no debconf information
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
