Bug#377789: marked as done (Uninstallable due to unmet dep on mozilla-browser (< 2:1.7.12.1))

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 20:47:11 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#377789: fixed in mozilla-locale-it 1.7.12-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#382916: marked as done (scanerrlog: uninstallable with Python 2.4)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 19:47:13 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#382916: fixed in scanerrlog 2.01-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#382399: marked as done (Uninstallable due to unmet dep on jaxml (>= 2.24))

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 19:47:13 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#382399: fixed in scanerrlog 2.01-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#148871: marked as done (scanerrlog: doc suggestion for logrotate )

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 19:47:13 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#148871: fixed in scanerrlog 2.01-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#393587: marked as done (haxml: FTBFS with ghc6 6.6)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 19:17:25 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#393587: fixed in haxml 1.13.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#385302: marked as done (gfslicer: [INTL:sv] Swedish PO translation)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 19:17:19 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#385302: fixed in gfslicer 1.5.4-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#393318: marked as done (FTBFS: configure: error: libetpan 0.42 support required)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 18:22:08 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#393318: Unreproducable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respons

Bug#393572: marked as done (heartbeat: mknod in maintainer script)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Oct 2006 06:20:45 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#393572: heartbeat: mknod in maintainer script has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#393331: marked as done (FTBFS with new libetpan)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 18:22:08 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#393318: Unreproducable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respons

Bug#393330: marked as done (FTBFS with new libetpan)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 18:22:08 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#393318: Unreproducable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respons

Bug#392219: marked as done (treeviewx: Printing generates null postscript output)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 21:18:41 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#392219: fixed in treeviewx 0.5.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#363517: marked as done (FTBFS on kfreebsd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 20:02:22 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#363517: fixed in xorg-server 2:1.1.1-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#393316: marked as done (liblircclient0 0.8.0-8 uninstallable in sid)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 17:32:43 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#393351: fixed in gcc-defaults 1.47 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#393297: marked as done (Depends on package from experimental)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 17:32:43 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#393351: fixed in gcc-defaults 1.47 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#393541: marked as done (aircrack-ng: airodump gives confusing message on Ctrl-C)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Oct 2006 02:53:58 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#393541: aircrack-ng: airodump gives confusing message on Ctrl-C has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If t

Bug#196442: marked as done (libpam-runtime: PAM Policy, includes?)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 19:39:22 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug

Bug#386633: marked as done (nvclock: version 0.8 beta 2 available upstream)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 20:32:17 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#386633: fixed in nvclock 0.8b2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#337616: marked as done (gw-config returns broken flags)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 20:32:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#337616: fixed in kannel 1.4.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#393351: marked as done (depends on libc6 2.4, which is not in unstable)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 17:32:43 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#393351: fixed in gcc-defaults 1.47 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#393562: marked as done (libgcj-bc: no copyright file and no changelog)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 17:32:43 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#393562: fixed in gcc-defaults 1.47 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#392295: marked as done (xserver-xorg-core: /etc/X11/X missing)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 20:02:22 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#392295: fixed in xorg-server 2:1.1.1-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#365274: marked as done (xserver-xorg-core: upstream changelog missing)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 20:02:22 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365274: fixed in xorg-server 2:1.1.1-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#391052: marked as done (xserver-xorg: Control-Alt-Keypad Plus/Minus not recognized)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 20:02:22 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#391052: fixed in xorg-server 2:1.1.1-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#390646: marked as done (xserver-xorg: Server crash when switching back from full screen mode)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 20:02:22 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#390646: fixed in xorg-server 2:1.1.1-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#390599: marked as done (xnest: Manpage contains __mansuffix__ rather than the correct man section)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 20:02:22 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#390599: fixed in xorg-server 2:1.1.1-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#392312: marked as done (xserver-xorg-core: [sparc] Freezes system and causes severe data loss)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 20:02:22 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#392312: fixed in xorg-server 2:1.1.1-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#373577: marked as done (documentation is missing (two problems))

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 16:32:24 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#373577: fixed in euro-support 1.35 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#355572: marked as done (euro-support: Please use a proper workaround for gettext and shell scripts)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 16:32:24 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#355572: fixed in euro-support 1.35 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#331341: marked as done (euro-support: [INTL:sv] Swedish debconf templates translation)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 16:32:24 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#331341: fixed in euro-support 1.35 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#375259: marked as done (euro-support: various errors during upgrade)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 16:32:24 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#375259: fixed in euro-support 1.35 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#313594: marked as done (INTL:vi)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 16:32:24 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#313594: fixed in euro-support 1.35 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#292764: marked as done ([INTL:it] Italian po-debconf translation for euro-support)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 16:32:24 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#292764: fixed in euro-support 1.35 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: white windows resolved

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 393099 Bug#393099: white windows with new compiz on nvidia "pixmap can't be bound to texture" 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Nick Lewycky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Processed: Re: Bug#393516: Uninstallable due to dependency on poppler-utils which conflicts

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 393516 important Bug#393516: Uninstallable due to dependency on poppler-utils which conflicts Severity set to `important' from `serious' > merge 393516 393162 Bug#393162: pdftohtml: Broken dependencies Bug#393516: Uninstallable due to dependen

Bug#390943: marked as done (x11-common: sarge to etch upgrade fails (/usr/X11R6 issue))

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 19:03:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#390943: fixed in xorg 1:7.1.0-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#393378: marked as done (Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 19:03:01 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#393378: fixed in kdelibs 4:3.5.5a.dfsg.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#391563: marked as done (needs versioned dependency on xserver 1.1)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 19:03:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#391563: fixed in xorg 1:7.1.0-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#392456: marked as done (xorg: [INTL:de] German debconf templates translation update )

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 19:03:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#392456: fixed in xorg 1:7.1.0-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#393585: marked as done (c2hs: FTBFS with ghc6 6.6)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 18:32:12 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#393585: fixed in c2hs 0.14.5-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#393595: marked as done (libapache-mod-php5: Dependency Problem (apache2-common) prevents from installing)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 18:35:56 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line [php-maint] Bug#393595: libapache-mod-php5: Dependency Problem (apache2-common) prevents from installing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#393548: marked as done (ifenslave: no copyright file)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Oct 2006 00:51:50 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#393548: ifenslave: no copyright file has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#392324: marked as done (nvidia-settings: Please ship NVCtrl header files ;))

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:32:39 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#392324: fixed in nvidia-settings 1.0+20060516-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the ca

Bug#393067: marked as done (FTBFS: Failed to create ./qtdirs.)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:18:52 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#393067: fixed in python-qt4 4.0.1-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#393475: marked as done (tz-brasil: Info correct, but time is incorrect)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:19:43 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#393475: fixed in tz-brasil 0.5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#393413: marked as done (Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:19:24 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#393413: fixed in stunnel 2:3.26-dfsg-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#393463: marked as done (tz-brasil: needs to force an update of /etc/localtime)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:19:43 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#393463: fixed in tz-brasil 0.5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#381414: marked as done (new upstream)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:10:30 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#381414: fixed in integrit 4.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#388871: marked as done (cryptsetup: Misleading error message)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:06:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#388871: fixed in cryptsetup 2:1.0.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#384309: marked as done (dvipsk-ja: Restores admin-removed conffile)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:06:39 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#384309: fixed in dvipsk-ja 5.95a+jp1.7a-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#393367: marked as done (Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:07:44 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#393367: fixed in erlang 1:11.b.1.dfsg-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#392542: marked as done (diff for 5.95a+jp1.7a-1.2 NMU)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:06:39 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#392542: fixed in dvipsk-ja 5.95a+jp1.7a-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#393525: marked as done (Does not compile with evolution 2.8.x)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:06:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#393525: fixed in contact-lookup-applet 0.15-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#383266: marked as done (dvipsk-ja: Couldn't find header file texnansi.enc)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:06:39 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#383266: fixed in dvipsk-ja 5.95a+jp1.7a-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#340253: marked as done (dvipsk-ja sets wrong path (TEXPSHEADERS.dvips))

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:06:39 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#383266: fixed in dvipsk-ja 5.95a+jp1.7a-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#388083: marked as done (cryptsetup update does not check crypttab, grave problems during reboot)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:06:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#388083: fixed in cryptsetup 2:1.0.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#374092: marked as done (add -b option for binding to an alternate address)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:06:32 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#374092: fixed in dhttpd 1.02a-16 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#357199: marked as done (dvipsk-ja: support TeXLive)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:06:39 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#357199: fixed in dvipsk-ja 5.95a+jp1.7a-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#379771: marked as done (cryptsetup: encrypted swap does not work on existing swap partition)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:06:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#385317: fixed in cryptsetup 2:1.0.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#392950: marked as done (latex209-bin: purging the package fails (update-fmtutil unavailable))

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:11:29 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#392950: fixed in latex209 25.mar.1992-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#387158: marked as done (cryptsetup: problem configuring encrypted swap)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:06:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#387158: fixed in cryptsetup 2:1.0.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#388851: marked as done (Pressing DEL in erlang-mode (XEmacs) acts as if BACKSPACE were pressed)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:07:44 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#388851: fixed in erlang 1:11.b.1.dfsg-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#383266: marked as done (dvipsk-ja: Couldn't find header file texnansi.enc)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:06:39 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340253: fixed in dvipsk-ja 5.95a+jp1.7a-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#340253: marked as done (dvipsk-ja sets wrong path (TEXPSHEADERS.dvips))

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:06:39 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340253: fixed in dvipsk-ja 5.95a+jp1.7a-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#390514: marked as done (cryptsetup doesn't work with SSL encrypted keys)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:06:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#390514: fixed in cryptsetup 2:1.0.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#385317: marked as done (cryptsetup: cannot start encrypted swap with static key)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:06:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#385317: fixed in cryptsetup 2:1.0.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#389835: marked as done (better out of the box luks root migration support)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:06:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#389835: fixed in cryptsetup 2:1.0.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#149211: marked as done (missing depends)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Oct 2006 00:11:40 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line missing depends has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Bug#391063: marked as done (dvipsk-ja: purging the package fails (update-texmf unavailable))

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:06:39 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#391063: fixed in dvipsk-ja 5.95a+jp1.7a-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#332342: marked as done (contact-lookup-applet: [INTL:sv] Swedish PO-template translation update)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:06:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#332342: fixed in contact-lookup-applet 0.15-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#390354: marked as done (Fails in removed state)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:06:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#390354: fixed in cryptsetup 2:1.0.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Processed: Bug#310254: Fixed long ago

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 310254 Bug#310254: [l10n] Initial Czech translation of pnm2ppa debconf messages 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Miroslav Kure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > quit Stoppin

Bug#393578: marked as done (netbase should be split)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 23:42:31 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#393578: netbase should be split has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#393506: marked as done (HAL does not work properly)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 23:45:06 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug report incorrect has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit

Bug#393474: marked as done (mod-frontpage-mirfak: FTBFS: conflicting berkeley db versions libdb4.3-dev/libdb4.4-dev)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:15:44 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#393474: fixed in mod-frontpage-mirfak 1.6.2-12 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#392981: marked as done (jtex-bin: purging the package fails (update-texmf unavailable))

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:19:35 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#392981: fixed in texfam 1.2.1-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#392775: marked as done (libtest-www-mechanize-perl: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends and other test failures)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:13:20 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#392775: fixed in libtest-www-mechanize-perl 1.12-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#364988: marked as done (wxTreeCtrl instance has no attribute 'Bind')

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 23:06:59 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line pykaraoke bug: wxTreeCtrl instance has no attribute 'Bind' has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#392842: marked as done (libqt3-mt: .xsession-errors flooded with qstring_to_xtp result code -2)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 23:26:10 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line .xsession-errors flooded with qstring_to_xtp result code -2) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is n

Bug#393299: marked as done (gnat-gps_3.1.3-3(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-depends)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 22:57:12 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#393299: gnat-gps_3.1.3-3(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-depends has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with

Bug#393086: marked as done (Recover default WindowMaker theme)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Oct 2006 01:24:00 +0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing Debian bug reports should be closed when the problem is fixed. Problems in packages can only be considered fixed once a package that includes the bug fix enters the Debian archive. Norm

Bug#381150: marked as done (does not support partitionable RAID arrays)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 22:30:07 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line RAID in grub2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to re

Bug#244740: marked as done (xanim: can't play wav files on PowerPC)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:14:55 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line xanim is gone has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to re

Bug#246426: marked as done (xanim, unsupported quicktime codecs and mailcap video/quicktime entry)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:14:55 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line xanim is gone has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to re

Bug#385122: marked as done (reportbug does not recognize locale token in .reportbugrc)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:12:40 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line locale token never existed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respons

Bug#300342: marked as done ('man xanim' typos: "inital", "useage", "modfiy", etc.)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:14:55 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line xanim is gone has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to re

Bug#379664: marked as done (gnus: Mail/Incoming* files appear)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 16:07:33 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line gnus: Mail/Incoming* files appear has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: confirming bugs fixed in NMU

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 306071 Bug#306071: spfmilter: fails to start with a missing shared object error 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Good Times <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > close 307086 Bu

Bug#388398: marked as done (RM: clisp [sparc] -- RoM; FTBFS)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 11:48:33 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#388398: fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t

Bug#393353: marked as done (syntax error in /var/lib/dpkg/info/mydns-mysql.postinst file)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 11:18:12 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#393353: fixed in mydns 1:1.1.0-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#393515: marked as done (otrs 2.0.3p01-4 (sarge) GenericAgent.pl problem)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 20:17:02 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#393515: otrs 2.0.3p01-4 (sarge) GenericAgent.pl problem has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#387167: marked as done (RM: scm [s390] -- RoM; ANAIS)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 11:29:50 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#387167: fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t

Bug#393319: marked as done (licq-plugin-qt: installation error)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 11:02:55 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#393319: fixed in licq 1.3.4-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#381956: marked as done (python-kde3: python segfaults on calling KABC.StdAddressBook.self())

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 21:02:16 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line This is not a bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t

Bug#389357: marked as done (RM: wmii2 [ia64] -- RoM; ANAIS)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 11:35:50 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#389357: fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t

Bug#267626: marked as done (ITP: chuck -- concurrent on-the-fly audio programming language)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 09:30:20 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#267626: fixed in chuck 1.2.0.7.dfsg-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#391344: marked as done (RM: vzctl [hppa m68k] -- RoM; ANAIS)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 11:32:37 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#391344: fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t

Processed: VI translation was already included in latest upload

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 390316 0.3~cvs20060928-1 Bug#390316: uswsusp: [INTL:vi] Vietnamese debconf templates translation 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 0.3~cvs20060928-1, send any further explanatio

Bug#357684: marked as done (should be "arch: all")

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 08:16:32 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#357684: fixed in singularity 0.25-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#393412: marked as done (Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 10:48:29 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#393412: fixed in silc-toolkit 0.9.12-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#393359: marked as done (Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 11:02:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#393359: fixed in bind9 1:9.3.2-P1.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

  1   2   3   >