Re: netselect on Cygwin

On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 10:11:42PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 09:09:51PM -0600, Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) wrote: > > Has anyone built a working netselect for cygwin, or have a decent > > alternative? > > You might want to think about providing more details about what >

A bit random I know but.. [was RE: Eliminating -mno-cygwin from gcc?]

On 05 February 2007 03:01, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 11:03:12PM -, Dave Korn wrote: >> On 31 January 2007 15:39, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> >> Sorry, but we don't support Linux on this mailing list. ;) >>> >>> Yes we do. I just changed the cygwin web page.

RE: Eliminating -mno-cygwin from gcc.

On 05 February 2007 03:10, Christopher Faylor wrote: > I guess this means that I need to generate a cross-binutils, too. Should be no need; the scripts I'm using do the lot. cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml

Re: Eliminating -mno-cygwin from gcc.

Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Christopher Faylor wrote: If you have been reading this list for any length of time then it should be obvious that merely mentioning something in cygwin-announce is not an adequate way to let people know about serious

Re: Eliminating -mno-cygwin from gcc.

Christopher Faylor wrote: Having a true mingw cross-compiler does sound like the right first step. I guess this means that I need to generate a cross-binutils, too. And we'll probably have to have w32api install into both /usr/include/w32api|/usr/lib/w32api/ and also into /usr/i686-pc-mingw3

Re: Eliminating -mno-cygwin from gcc.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Christopher Faylor wrote: > If you have been reading this list for any length of time then it should > be obvious that merely mentioning something in cygwin-announce is not an > adequate way to let people know about serious changes. Trust me I know;

Re: Eliminating -mno-cygwin from gcc.

On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 09:13:32PM -0600, Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >>I think I'd rather wait until some kind of early warning system is >>available in setup.exe than issue a "deprecated" warning which has the >>capacity to propagate everywhere and live for a long time

Re: Eliminating -mno-cygwin from gcc.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Christopher Faylor wrote: > I think I'd rather wait until some kind of early warning system is > available in setup.exe than issue a "deprecated" warning which has > the capacity to propagate everywhere and live for a long time. Why isn't cygwin-ann

Re: netselect on Cygwin

On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 09:09:51PM -0600, Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) wrote: >Has anyone built a working netselect for cygwin, or have a decent >alternative? You might want to think about providing more details about what "netselect" is. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simpl

netselect on Cygwin

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Has anyone built a working netselect for cygwin, or have a decent alternative? Yaakov -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFxp//piWmPGlmQSMRCBLxAKCOKezjE

Re: Eliminating -mno-cygwin from gcc.

On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 11:29:59PM -, Dave Korn wrote: >There have been no serious objections, so I think we should go ahead. >Perhaps we should replace the gcc, g++, g77 etc. drivers with shell >scripts that look for -mno-cygwin on the command line and redirect to >i686-pc-mingw-{gcc,g++,etc}

Re: Eliminating -mno-cygwin from gcc.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dave Korn wrote: > > There have been no serious objections, so I think we should go ahead. > Perhaps we should replace the gcc, g++, g77 etc. drivers with shell scripts > that look for -mno-cygwin on the command line and redirect to > i686-pc-ming

Re: Eliminating -mno-cygwin from gcc?

On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 11:03:12PM -, Dave Korn wrote: >On 31 January 2007 15:39, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > >>> Sorry, but we don't support Linux on this mailing list. ;) >> >> Yes we do. I just changed the cygwin web page. :-) > > Copyright line needs updating... What in the world doe

Re: cygrunsrv problem

Brian, thanks for the informative explanation about cygrunsrv and demon processes. On 2/2/07, Brian Dessent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Wynfield Henman wrote: > The "cygrunsrv -Q " definitely is buggy to me. > When I started up my system "privoxy" is indeed up and running as it should be. > >

Re: New Mirror Up and Running

Peter Grigor wrote: Hi there: I'm not sure if this is the correct mailing list to make this announcement but I've added a new cygwin mirror at http://cygwin.mirrors.hoobly.com If you want to become an official mirror, you want to send a request to be added to the list to sourcemaster. See

New Mirror Up and Running

Hi there: I'm not sure if this is the correct mailing list to make this announcement but I've added a new cygwin mirror at http://cygwin.mirrors.hoobly.com Regards, Peter <^_^> -- Peter Grigor Hoobly Inc http://www.hoobly.com -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

Eliminating -mno-cygwin from gcc.

There have been no serious objections, so I think we should go ahead. Perhaps we should replace the gcc, g++, g77 etc. drivers with shell scripts that look for -mno-cygwin on the command line and redirect to i686-pc-mingw-{gcc,g++,etc} or to i686-pc-cygwin-{gcc,g++,etc}, just to make life easie

RE: Eliminating -mno-cygwin from gcc?

On 31 January 2007 15:39, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> Sorry, but we don't support Linux on this mailing list. ;) > > Yes we do. I just changed the cygwin web page. :-) > > cgf Copyright line needs updating... cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today index-

Enthought and Cygwin

Is anyone succesfully using the Enthought distribution of Python with Cygwin? I have numerous trouble if going this route, and would be interested in other's experience. -john -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.h

Bug with AES key byte order in cygcrypto-0.9.8.dll?

I'm seeing a difference byte order handling between cygcrypto-0.9.8.dll (0.9.8d-1) and cygcrypto-0.9.7.dll (0.9.7l-1) in AES_set_encrypt_key (and set_decrypt_key). Specifically, the 0.9.8 version doesn't appear to swap the byte order into LE correctly. The behavior and key byte order of 0.9.7 mat

Re: Compile-time detection of EOL translation mode (CLISP)

Reini Urban wrote: For me [defined(WIN32)] is true during clisp compilation. I had to change the patch to fix the WIN32 section, not the UNIX one. I'll check which optional header defines WIN32. I did actually test it to make sure I wasn't misremembering it being false. I haven't found any of

RE: File mode 0700 for windows-created files?

On 02 February 2007 19:37, Jim Garrison wrote: > Every file created by a non-Cygwin app appears in Cygwin > with mode 0700. I've read the documents pertaining to > ntfs permissions in Cygwin but don't see a way to configure > things so that Cygwin sees them as a more reasonable 0755 > or 0644 (fo

RE: [Fwd: CYGWIN "notty" (enthought solution?)]

On 02 February 2007 19:21, DePriest, Jason R. wrote: > On 1/31/07, John F Burkhart wrote: > [ - - - - - - - - cut - - - - - - - - ] >> the situation. Could someone perhaps explicitly sate how to set >> Cygwin=notty? > [ - - - - - - - -/cut - - - - - - - - ] > > Create a Windows environment varia