-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Christopher Faylor wrote: > I think I'd rather wait until some kind of early warning system is > available in setup.exe than issue a "deprecated" warning which has > the capacity to propagate everywhere and live for a long time.
Why isn't cygwin-announce sufficient? We rely on that for everything else. I'm just afraid that if the setup.exe patch , if not imminent, could hold up the gcc development. Yaakov -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFxqDcpiWmPGlmQSMRCBxWAJ91KwH585WrPDLxeX1bHvizbT2yUgCgsGOB tL58M1IyYcCHSDGpIYlsJLc= =jyH9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
