-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Dave Korn wrote:
>
> There have been no serious objections, so I think we should go ahead.
> Perhaps we should replace the gcc, g++, g77 etc. drivers with shell scripts
> that look for -mno-cygwin on the command line and redirect to
> i686-pc-mingw-{gcc,g++,etc} or to i686-pc-cygwin-{gcc,g++,etc}, just to make
> life easier for the backwardly-compatible, but I don't see any reason not to
> go ahead and remove the option from the driver.
Will using shell wrappers noticably slow down calls to gcc? Or should
we just start explicitly calling i686-pc-cygwin-gcc instead? (FWIW
Gentoo does the equivalent of the latter.)
Yaakov
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFFxp8vpiWmPGlmQSMRCKmkAKCMkLBDBYZ+P8NGLo7eff6+owmvsgCgsDh5
FTvd4ddzyI4MObGrHkRT7ds=
=TTvw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
