-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Christopher Faylor wrote: > If you have been reading this list for any length of time then it should > be obvious that merely mentioning something in cygwin-announce is not an > adequate way to let people know about serious changes.
Trust me I know; my question is why this is being handled differently than other major changes (e.g. bash), or if you're looking for a new way in general of notification, particularly as carrying out the change will confuse much fewer people than leaving the status-quo. Yaakov -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFxqeTpiWmPGlmQSMRCJejAJ0az/++k76Qz3EekXatKVT/DuVpFgCgnA7R OXjMlOmmDVQskJhnj/CYSIo= =xUq/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
