Wikipedia preparation for 2.4 release

2012-04-10 Thread Markus
or example. Markus ___ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel

Re: Wikipedia preparation for 2.4 release

2012-04-11 Thread Markus
pdated screenshots would be nice. I can take them from the official announcement later as long as they are high res and the displayed content is Free. Markus ___ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel

Re: Wikipedia preparation for 2.4 release

2012-04-11 Thread Markus
Am Mittwoch 11 April 2012, 14:49:16 schrieb Friedrich W. H. Kossebau: > Hm. Just that this blurs the real name a little. If I had to decide, I would > insist in the full name everywhere, no made up short forms. Well, there is a difference between wrong and abbreviated. Eg. "KDE 4.8.2 was released

Re: Moving the website to kde infrastructure?

2012-04-14 Thread Markus
> Will that mean the website will become calligra.kde.org, or can we keep > calligra.org? Why would DNS redirects be affected by that? I'm no expert in network technologies but AFAIK even if KDE provided calligra.kde.org, DNS entries are completely unrelated. “Worst” case: The Calligra website wo

Re: Demo documents to help showcase Calligra - where to store + thoughts?

2012-04-16 Thread Markus
Am Montag 16 April 2012, 15:18:36 schrieb Stuart Dickson: > The question is what the community would like to do with these - whether > to incorporate them within the calligra repository on git.kde.org, or > whether these should be kept in a separate repository, on gitorious for > example? IMO a s

Re: LO/Calligra compared

2012-04-17 Thread Markus
Am Dienstag 17 April 2012, 09:11:24 schrieb Jaroslaw Staniek: > http://www.datamation.com/open-source/open-source-office-apps-calligra-suite > -vs-libreoffice-1.html Page 2 loading for anybody? ___ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https

Re: Wikipedia preparation for 2.4 release

2012-04-17 Thread Markus
7;t find it in the repo. As far as I can see only Krita and Flow are under GPL. Markus Am Mittwoch 11 April 2012, 02:59:07 schrieb Markus: > Hi. > In the past months I worked to get the Calligra Wikipedia articles into > shape. Could you please review https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calligr

Re: obsolete stuff

2012-04-17 Thread Markus
>musicshape -- Mek, are you still maintaining this? It still works. As long it is not broken,why remove it? ___ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel

Re: Seeking Permission to Use Photos From www.Calligra.org on About.com

2012-04-27 Thread Markus
d Calligra, incl. the screenshots. Feel free to dig through https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calligra_Suite as well as the sub pages for individual applications. The screenshots obviously follow the same rules as described above. Markus Am Donnerstag 26 April 2012, 22:17:30 schrieb Cindy Grig

Re: Please update http://kde.org/applications/office/

2012-05-07 Thread Markus
Am Montag 07 Mai 2012, 16:19:53 schrieb Cyrille Berger Skott: > "add calligra applications to kde.org/applications > update karbon and remove kpresenter, kspread, kivio and kplato (this is to > my knowledge, in accordance to the arbitration, if I am wrong, please tell > me, and I will correct any

Re: Announcement of 2.5alpha -- what to highlight?

2012-05-28 Thread Markus
o be ready for academic presentations and abstracts in the humanities, 2.6.0 extends that to natural sciences, and 2.7.0 might be ready for a 100+ pages thesis, incl. automatic hyphenation support etc. Markus ___ calligra-devel mailing list calli

Re: Announcement of 2.5alpha -- what to highlight?

2012-05-28 Thread Markus
Am Montag 28 Mai 2012, 16:28:08 schrieb Inge Wallin: > Also good points. But I'll wait with these distinctions until 2.5.0 is > announced. This time it's little less than a formal announcement and a few > hightlights of new features. Well, my experience also tells me that the more text you can r

Re: features progress list

2012-06-17 Thread Markus
Am Sonntag 17 Juni 2012, 12:51:54 schrieb C. Boemann: > And since I use it for Words, lib, plugins and the features I work on, I > don't want to carry around a lot of cruft, making it hard to use this page > in a fast efficient manner. Why not use Bugzilla as Martin Gräßlin explained in his "bko"

Re: Clef icons

2012-08-06 Thread Markus
Am Sonntag 05 August 2012, 18:45:07 schrieb Yuri Chornoivan: > написане Sun, 05 Aug 2012 18:09:56 +0300, Inge Wallin > > > Nice clefs! Do you also have the svg for them? > > Attached. Obtained using MusixTeX. Huh, nothing shows up in Karbon 2.5rc ___

Re: Clef icons

2012-08-11 Thread Markus
Am Samstag 11 August 2012, 16:47:06 schrieb Friedrich W. H. Kossebau: > > "MusiXTeX fonts may be freely copied, duplicated and used in conformance > > to the GNU General Public License (Version 2, 1991, > > see included file gpl.txt)." > > GPL2 might be a no-go with Calligra, or? At least the mus

Re: icons...

2012-08-14 Thread Markus
Am Dienstag 14 August 2012, 20:13:43 schrieb Friedrich W. H. Kossebau: > Maybe misunderstood Boudewijns request then: is this about the icons > Calligra installs itself (and then does not use), or about the icons it > uses from the official Oxygen icon set? Oxygen set -- to cut down the installer

Re: Calligra Article by LinuxUser

2012-09-15 Thread Markus
Am Freitag, 14. September 2012, 16:33:34 schrieb Sven Langkamp: > On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > > Hi, > > A new Calligra Article by LinuxUser (German): > > > > http://www.linux-community.de/Internal/Artikel/Print-Artikel/LinuxUser/201 > > 2/10/Calligra-KDE-Office-aus

Re: Calligra Active screenshots and home page

2012-09-15 Thread Markus
Am Samstag, 15. September 2012, 15:17:30 schrieb Jaroslaw Staniek: > Hi, > One wikipedia contributor asked me about Calligra Active screenshots. Yeah, that was me after I once asked for screenshots here and never got a reply. > Do we have anything prepared? > Or should we use shorts from this:

Re: Calligra Active screenshots and home page

2012-09-15 Thread Markus
Am Samstag, 15. September 2012, 19:47:03 schrieb Shantanu Tushar Jha: > Hi, > > here you go- > > http://i.imgur.com/cOSDj.png > http://i.imgur.com/1tgUw.png > http://i.imgur.com/YVNcL.png Thanks. Are the displayed documents copyrighted under a non-free license? __

Re: Calligra Active screenshots and home page

2012-09-17 Thread Markus
Am Samstag, 15. September 2012, 21:50:05 schrieb Jaroslaw Staniek: > On 15 September 2012 16:17, Shantanu Tushar Jha wrote: > > Hi, > > > > here you go- > > > > http://i.imgur.com/cOSDj.png > > http://i.imgur.com/1tgUw.png > > http://i.imgur.com/YVNcL.png > > Cool, before publishing I would pro

Re: Calligra and Unity - Here's our chance

2012-10-05 Thread Markus
Am Freitag, 5. Oktober 2012, 15:03:15 schrieb Inge Wallin: > Indeed, but the point this time is that we have a chance to get them fixed > for us _now_ if we react quickly. In other words, we wouldn't have to do > anything ourselves. Does really nobody have Unity on their machine? I could try to

Re: Calligra and Unity - Here's our chance

2012-10-05 Thread Markus
Am Freitag, 5. Oktober 2012, 20:19:41 schrieb Inge Wallin: > > I could try to install it from an unofficial openSUSE repo later but as I > > am not a coder, I could only report bugs and not fix them. > > Wonderful! Absolutely no programming necessary. The only gotcha is that the > bugs have to b

Maintainer elections?

2012-12-05 Thread Markus
;m just curious what happened to it (again: IIRC). Bye Markus ___ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel

Re: App icons for non-SC apps in the oxygen iconset, useful?

2013-01-13 Thread Markus
app icons with 'calligra' prefix. Raise the minimum platform requirement as soon as RHEL7 and SLED12 are out (I'm guessing their decision to stick with 4.3 is the sole reason why 4.3 is even targeted at all.) Markus ___ calligra-devel mai

Re: Fwd: Rename Coffice?

2013-03-25 Thread Markus
Isn't the previous Calligra Mobile unmaintained? If yes: Reuse Calligra Mobile. Calligra Mini is not too bad either. Am Montag, 25. März 2013, 09:09:00 schrieb Sebastian Sauer: > Common feedback seems to be that the application should contain the > "Calligra" name to raise awareness / make our br

Re: Calligra most annoying bugs.

2011-09-29 Thread Markus Slopianka
> trouble with these kind of things is that it becomes a "who can shout the > loudest" contest. > > So if there was a good way to measure it i would agree, but nomination by > one annoyed user is not it imho. Well, crashers and data losses are good candidates.

Re: Calligra most annoying bugs.

2011-09-29 Thread Markus Slopianka
On Donnerstag 29 September 2011 13:17:27 Inge Wallin wrote: > No, one developer is not enough. They have some form of simple vote > procedure but I haven't worked out the details yet. Bugzilla has a voting feature. Why not simply look at those? ___ cal

Re: Calligra on Tizen and beyond

2011-09-30 Thread Markus Slopianka
On Donnerstag 29 September 2011 22:42:24 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > Couldn't we announce willingness (not formal plan) to provide the > office suite for Tizen assuming this is rather little effort? If Tizen ends up being a normal Linux distribution, maybe running Wayland and even includes Qt beca

Re: New logo

2011-10-07 Thread Markus Slopianka
Which license is that logo under? Is it standard Oxygen Icons licensing (=LGPL to allow embedding it into GPL apps), is it CC-BY-SA, or anything else (LGPL+CC dual licensing for example)? On Donnerstag 06 Oktober 2011 18:38:23 Thorsten Zachmann wrote: > Hello all, > > here is the logo Eugene

Re: New logo

2011-10-07 Thread Markus Slopianka
On Freitag 07 Oktober 2011 14:05:39 C. Boemann wrote: > For now assume it's Eugenes sole property. We would probably choose a quite > restrictive licence like firefox. I know this might be a problem with > debian[1] but i don't think it can be any other way if we want to protect > our brand. You

Re: New logo

2011-10-07 Thread Markus Slopianka
On Donnerstag 06 Oktober 2011 19:20:26 Shantanu Tushar Jha wrote: > Exactly what I was waiting for, can I put this in About screen of Calligra > Active ? No. C. Boemann said that the logo is currently not freely licensed which makes it non- compliant with paragraphs 4, 5, 7, and 10 of http://te

Re: New logo

2011-10-12 Thread Markus Slopianka
On Mittwoch 12 Oktober 2011 09:56:02 Sebastian Sauer wrote: > No, it is Calligra's brand any that's it. The Calligra community will > decide and nobody else. KDE is the community and as long as Calligra uses KDE's infrastructure, you are bound by certain rules and that means no unfree media. Th

Re: New logo

2011-10-12 Thread Markus Slopianka
On Mittwoch 12 Oktober 2011 13:42:37 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > > KDE is the community and as long as Calligra uses KDE's infrastructure, > > you are bound by certain rules and that means no unfree media. > > That said, Copyright and Trademarks are still completely different > > things. You (or KDE

Re: on Words

2011-10-14 Thread Markus Slopianka
> I suggest that we will target the university student. Meaning we should be > able to view MS Word documents and be able to create from scratch reports > and dissertations. Now that you mentioned university students… I recently got the thesis of a friend to review. It's large (166 pages, includi

Re: New logo

2011-10-26 Thread Markus Slopianka
On Donnerstag 27 Oktober 2011 00:54:22 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > Hi, > Started the logo policy page: > http://community.kde.org/Calligra/Policies/Logo > > Definitely work in progress. Based on http://www.debian.org/logos/. > > What legal entity could be put at [Calligra] placeholder here? KDE eV

Re: New logo

2011-11-03 Thread Markus Slopianka
On Donnerstag 03 November 2011 22:50:58 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > LGPL is really a bad idea for artwork... No, it's not. The Oxygen team isn't stupid. They chose LGPL for a reason. > I would suggest CC-BY-SA, which is > basically like LGPL but for artwork: > > http://creativecommons.org/lic

Re: Voting for the best name for the Caligra Spreadsheet Application

2011-11-14 Thread Markus Slopianka
While I'm usually in favor of using Esperanto, "Kalkultabelo" isn't a handy word. https://eo.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalkultabelo On Montag 14 November 2011 10:43:32 Jaime wrote: > I know you all remember all the spreadsheets names already used, but > as a reminder: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spr

Re: Voting for the best name for the Caligra Spreadsheet Application

2011-11-14 Thread Markus Slopianka
On Montag 14 November 2011 21:06:12 C. Boemann wrote: > Just to get it straight - it's not possible to add new suggestions to the > vote > > but Abacus is one of the choices Wow, now we know Abacus and Tables. I mean, I at least somehow get why one might not let any random person vote but why a

Re: Calligra Words mission statement and roadmap (1st draft)

2011-11-14 Thread Markus Slopianka
On Sonntag 13 November 2011 12:39:02 C. Boemann wrote: > RoadMap > > The goal is to be ready for 2.6 for regular usage without having all the > more special features that are just nice-to-have. > > Qt 5 patches (boemann, pierreSt) With Calligra also being an engine provider for othe

Re: results from

2011-11-21 Thread Markus Slopianka
The list of names is so terrible, I now understand why you fought so hard to keep it secret, handpicked eligible voters, and suppressed any attempt to make suggestions after your pseudo-democratic vote started... On Sonntag 20 November 2011 21:42:59 C. Boemann wrote: > Hi > > Here are the re

Re: [calligra] /: Qt3Support is also needed in Calligra.

2011-12-02 Thread Markus Slopianka
released. So yeah, many users will get Qt5/KF5 pretty soon. I don't think it would be wise to do any Calligra release after summer 2012 that requires Qt 4. Markus ___ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel

Re: [calligra] /: Qt3Support is also needed in Calligra.

2011-12-02 Thread Markus Slopianka
; I cannot assume > the desktop will be rock stable starting from the .0 release No Plasma Workspaces 5.0 release is planned at the foreseeable future. The upcoming summer release will be 4.9 and based on KF5, just as KOffice 1.x were based on different Qt and KDE libraries. If you have problem

Re: [calligra] /: Qt3Support is also needed in Calligra.

2011-12-03 Thread Markus Slopianka
On Samstag 03 Dezember 2011 23:56:14 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > All minor uses of QT3SUPPORT in Kexi will be removed really soon. Only > complex code of tableview that depends on it still stays untouched > because it's tested for years with Qt 3 and Qt3 support and _is_ > stable. Well you could try

"Calligra" or "Calligra Suite"?

2011-12-04 Thread Markus Slopianka
n favour of simply "Calligra" since calligra.org is now secured. Markus ___ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel

Re: "Calligra" or "Calligra Suite"?

2011-12-07 Thread Markus Slopianka
On Sonntag 04 Dezember 2011 18:56:03 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > Hi, > > Well actually, the idea is that "Calligra" is the "project", while > "Calligra Suite" is the name of the suite of applications. But we have > never really formalized that, nor wrote specified specific guide lines. > And we

RFC: Calligra press kit

2011-12-07 Thread Markus Slopianka
tlook to the next major version (gathered from mails sent over this list). It's obviously not a complete feature list (and not meant to be), just something to keep reviewers excited. How do you like it? Anything to add or remove? Markus ___ call

Re: RFC: Calligra press kit

2011-12-07 Thread Markus Slopianka
a few days before the 2.4 release, the outlook part can also be removed. It's nice to have but non-vital. Markus ___ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel

Re: RFC: Calligra press kit

2011-12-07 Thread Markus Slopianka
That sounds more like a dedicated page on TechBase is needed. I can rephrase the part about Engine to something like "Calligra Engine is in the process of becoming ... check techbase.kde.org/... for more detailed info". Markus On Mittwoch 07 Dezember 2011 21:46:11 Jaroslaw Staniek w

Re: RFC: Calligra press kit

2011-12-07 Thread Markus Slopianka
aw Staniek wrote: > On 7 December 2011 23:53, Markus Slopianka wrote: > > On Mittwoch 07 Dezember 2011 22:54:11 C. Boemann wrote: > >> I think it looks generally very nice. The part about version 3.0 is > >> incorrect however. We plan for at least 2.5 and 2.6 before 3

Re: RFC: Calligra press kit

2011-12-07 Thread Markus Slopianka
changed the paragraph in the press kit to no longer contain KF5 specifics. While I think that a 2012 roadmap should be finalized for the 2.4 release, specifics are out of scope for the press kit anyway. Markus ___ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel

Re: RFC: Calligra press kit

2011-12-08 Thread Markus Slopianka
On Donnerstag 08 Dezember 2011 14:59:20 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > On Thursday 08 December 2011, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > > The attractive thing, to my mind, is that porting to KDE 5 is more like > > porting to Qt... Instead of using KFileDialog, we should use QFileDialog, > > instead of KMessag

Re: RFC: Calligra press kit

2011-12-08 Thread Markus Slopianka
> I'm not in the least interested in fine semantic distinctions and will > continue using KDE5 as a convenient shorthand for the version of the > libraries that are compatible with Qt5 and that are incompatible with our > current source code, In which universe is "KDE5" shorter than KF5? > irreg

Re: Review Request: New UI for words, some hopefully insignificat changes to other apps

2011-10-17 Thread Markus Meik Slopianka
Character and Paragraph) that don't indiciate via an arrow that they are actually drop-down lists. Aside from that in the first and in the Karbon screenshot icons are missing. - Markus Meik Slopianka On Oct. 15, 2011, 4:49 p.m., C. Boemann