On Donnerstag 03 November 2011 22:50:58 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > LGPL is really a bad idea for artwork...
No, it's not. The Oxygen team isn't stupid. They chose LGPL for a reason. > I would suggest CC-BY-SA, which is > basically like LGPL but for artwork: > > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ I repeat myself but I already suggested LGPL/CC dual licensing. LGPL is more handy for embedding artwork in GPLed apps while CC is better for websites and alike. _______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
