> I'm not in the least interested in fine semantic distinctions and will
> continue using KDE5 as a convenient shorthand for the version of the
> libraries that are compatible with Qt5 and that are incompatible with our
> current source code,
In which universe is "KDE5" shorter than KF5?
> irreg
On Donnerstag 08 Dezember 2011 14:59:20 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> On Thursday 08 December 2011, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > The attractive thing, to my mind, is that porting to KDE 5 is more like
> > porting to Qt... Instead of using KFileDialog, we should use QFileDialog,
> > instead of KMessag
On Donnerstag 08 Dezember 2011 01:54:40 Sven Langkamp wrote:
> Even if KF 5 is released in summer 2012, it won't be in major distributions
> before october.
Yes. With 2.6 targeted around that time I'd make perfect sense to switch to Qt5
then.
> I think the most important thing that we learned
aw Staniek wrote:
> On 7 December 2011 23:53, Markus Slopianka wrote:
> > On Mittwoch 07 Dezember 2011 22:54:11 C. Boemann wrote:
> >> I think it looks generally very nice. The part about version 3.0 is
> >> incorrect however. We plan for at least 2.5 and 2.6 before 3
That sounds more like a dedicated page on TechBase is needed.
I can rephrase the part about Engine to something like "Calligra Engine is in
the process
of becoming ... check techbase.kde.org/... for more detailed info".
Markus
On Mittwoch 07 Dezember 2011 21:46:11 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> I
On Mittwoch 07 Dezember 2011 22:54:11 C. Boemann wrote:
> I think it looks generally very nice. The part about version 3.0 is
> incorrect however. We plan for at least 2.5 and 2.6 before 3.0 neither of
> which will include support for new qt or kde. Our release schedule is
> every 4 months from now
Hi.
Since bad weather forced me to stay at home instead of going exercising, I'm
already done
with what was originally planned to be a mere set of very short guidelines for
the names
Calligra and Calligra Suite: http://community.kde.org/Calligra/Press_Kit_2.4
It even evolved into a (short) pre
On Sonntag 04 Dezember 2011 18:56:03 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Well actually, the idea is that "Calligra" is the "project", while
> "Calligra Suite" is the name of the suite of applications. But we have
> never really formalized that, nor wrote specified specific guide lines.
> And we
Hey there.
The website currently has contradictory statements:
Right on the homepage it says "Calligra Suite" at the top but below that
"Calligra 2.4".
The project was announced as Calligra Suite with capital C:
http://www.calligra.org/news/announcements/stable/calligra-suite-goes-active/
Later th
On Samstag 03 Dezember 2011 23:56:14 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> All minor uses of QT3SUPPORT in Kexi will be removed really soon. Only
> complex code of tableview that depends on it still stays untouched
> because it's tested for years with Qt 3 and Qt3 support and _is_
> stable.
Well you could try
On Freitag 02 Dezember 2011 15:45:42 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> I'd like to see plans for backporting KDE 5 modules to currently used
> distros, let's say, all lines of Ubuntu 10.x.
Already released distributions are in package / version freeze. No new packages
will be
introduced into standard r
On Freitag 02 Dezember 2011 11:25:33 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> We don't know how the KDE 5 will be deployed so would we have a
> transitional Calligra/Qt5 running on KDE/Qt4 before KDE/Qt5 arrives?
There won't ever be a "KDE 5" because "KDE" is not the name of software.
KDE Frameworks 5 (KF5) wil
The list of names is so terrible, I now understand why you fought so hard to
keep it
secret, handpicked eligible voters, and suppressed any attempt to make
suggestions after
your pseudo-democratic vote started...
On Sonntag 20 November 2011 21:42:59 C. Boemann wrote:
> Hi
>
> Here are the re
On Sonntag 13 November 2011 12:39:02 C. Boemann wrote:
> RoadMap
>
> The goal is to be ready for 2.6 for regular usage without having all the
> more special features that are just nice-to-have.
>
> Qt 5 patches (boemann, pierreSt)
With Calligra also being an engine provider for othe
On Montag 14 November 2011 21:06:12 C. Boemann wrote:
> Just to get it straight - it's not possible to add new suggestions to the
> vote
>
> but Abacus is one of the choices
Wow, now we know Abacus and Tables.
I mean, I at least somehow get why one might not let any random person vote but
why a
While I'm usually in favor of using Esperanto, "Kalkultabelo" isn't a handy
word.
https://eo.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalkultabelo
On Montag 14 November 2011 10:43:32 Jaime wrote:
> I know you all remember all the spreadsheets names already used, but
> as a reminder:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spr
On Donnerstag 03 November 2011 22:50:58 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> LGPL is really a bad idea for artwork...
No, it's not. The Oxygen team isn't stupid. They chose LGPL for a reason.
> I would suggest CC-BY-SA, which is
> basically like LGPL but for artwork:
>
> http://creativecommons.org/lic
On Donnerstag 27 Oktober 2011 00:54:22 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> Hi,
> Started the logo policy page:
> http://community.kde.org/Calligra/Policies/Logo
>
> Definitely work in progress. Based on http://www.debian.org/logos/.
>
> What legal entity could be put at [Calligra] placeholder here?
KDE eV
> I suggest that we will target the university student. Meaning we should be
> able to view MS Word documents and be able to create from scratch reports
> and dissertations.
Now that you mentioned university students…
I recently got the thesis of a friend to review. It's large (166 pages,
includi
On Mittwoch 12 Oktober 2011 13:42:37 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> > KDE is the community and as long as Calligra uses KDE's infrastructure,
> > you are bound by certain rules and that means no unfree media.
> > That said, Copyright and Trademarks are still completely different
> > things. You (or KDE
On Mittwoch 12 Oktober 2011 09:56:02 Sebastian Sauer wrote:
> No, it is Calligra's brand any that's it. The Calligra community will
> decide and nobody else.
KDE is the community and as long as Calligra uses KDE's infrastructure, you are
bound by
certain rules and that means no unfree media.
Th
On Donnerstag 06 Oktober 2011 19:20:26 Shantanu Tushar Jha wrote:
> Exactly what I was waiting for, can I put this in About screen of Calligra
> Active ?
No.
C. Boemann said that the logo is currently not freely licensed which makes it
non-
compliant with paragraphs 4, 5, 7, and 10 of
http://te
On Freitag 07 Oktober 2011 14:05:39 C. Boemann wrote:
> For now assume it's Eugenes sole property. We would probably choose a quite
> restrictive licence like firefox. I know this might be a problem with
> debian[1] but i don't think it can be any other way if we want to protect
> our brand.
You
Which license is that logo under? Is it standard Oxygen Icons licensing (=LGPL
to allow
embedding it into GPL apps), is it CC-BY-SA, or anything else (LGPL+CC dual
licensing for
example)?
On Donnerstag 06 Oktober 2011 18:38:23 Thorsten Zachmann wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> here is the logo Eugene
On Donnerstag 29 September 2011 22:42:24 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> Couldn't we announce willingness (not formal plan) to provide the
> office suite for Tizen assuming this is rather little effort?
If Tizen ends up being a normal Linux distribution, maybe running Wayland and
even
includes Qt beca
On Donnerstag 29 September 2011 13:17:27 Inge Wallin wrote:
> No, one developer is not enough. They have some form of simple vote
> procedure but I haven't worked out the details yet.
Bugzilla has a voting feature. Why not simply look at those?
___
cal
> trouble with these kind of things is that it becomes a "who can shout the
> loudest" contest.
>
> So if there was a good way to measure it i would agree, but nomination by
> one annoyed user is not it imho.
Well, crashers and data losses are good candidates.
27 matches
Mail list logo
