Re: Calligra Sprint 1.4.-3.4.

On Thursday 20 January 2011, Thorsten Zachmann wrote: > On Tuesday, January 18, 2011 11:10:12 Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > > On Saturday 15 January 2011, Thorsten Zachmann wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > > > looks like not everybody has filled out > > > > > > http://community.kde.org/Calligra/Meeting

git push error

Hi, I'm not able to push my local commits to Calligra repository today. Here is the error I'm getting. The error seems to suggest some kind of DNS resolution failure. But I'm able to successfully ping git.kde.org Anybody else facing this problem ? Thanks and Regards, Ganesh ganesh@ganesh-laptop:

Re: Combined startup view and file menu

I like the way Recent Documents are grouped and listed. For me the side pane looks cluttered in the top. How would it be, if it was evenly spaced out and fonts/icons little bigger ? On the whole +1 from me :) On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 1:10 AM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > Another mockup. > Variant

Re: Calligra Sprint 1.4.-3.4.

Hi, Just added my name to the attendance list. Feel free to kick me if I'm too late. However, I assure that I will be constructive at the sprint. Thanks On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 8:37 AM, Thorsten Zachmann wrote: > On Tuesday, January 18, 2011 11:10:12 Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > > On Saturday 15 Ja

Re: Calligra Sprint 1.4.-3.4.

On Tuesday, January 18, 2011 11:10:12 Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > On Saturday 15 January 2011, Thorsten Zachmann wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > looks like not everybody has filled out > > > > http://community.kde.org/Calligra/Meetings/Begin_2011_meeting#Attendance > > > > yet. This is a reminder to

Re: Combined startup view and file menu

On Wednesday 19 January 2011 22:14:25 Sebastian Sauer wrote: > On Wednesday 19 January 2011 20:40:30 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > > Another mockup. > > Variant of the 3.1 mockup: "Words" button's frame has been completely > > removed, so the button looks and feels like other menu items. > > > > http:

Re: Combined startup view and file menu

On Wednesday 19 January 2011 20:40:30 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > Another mockup. > Variant of the 3.1 mockup: "Words" button's frame has been completely > removed, so the button looks and feels like other menu items. > > http://community.kde.org/Calligra/Usability_and_UX/Common/Startup/Startup_v >

Re: Combined startup view and file menu

Another mockup. Variant of the 3.1 mockup: "Words" button's frame has been completely removed, so the button looks and feels like other menu items. http://community.kde.org/Calligra/Usability_and_UX/Common/Startup/Startup_view_integrated_with_the_File_menu#Startup_view_mockup_3.2:_with_view_hidden

Re: Review Request: Configuration dialogs for Calligra Applications

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100406/#review992 --- libs/main/KoConfigurationDialogPage.h

Re: cstester - a tool for testing loading and painting of documents

Asteazkena 19 Urtarrila 2011(e)an, Thorsten Zachmann(e)k idatzi zuen: > On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 09:37:57 Alfredo Beaumont wrote: > > Asteazkena 19 Urtarrila 2011(e)an, Thorsten Zachmann(e)k idatzi zuen: > > > I think using ia virtual image would be the best here so it is also > > > possible

Re: cstester - a tool for testing loading and painting of documents

On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 14:27:07 Inge Wallin wrote: > On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 05:46:04 Thorsten Zachmann wrote: > > On Tuesday, January 18, 2011 14:24:38 Inge Wallin wrote: > > > For Words, how about adding a dump of the text layout and compare > > > that? That should be easier (and

Re: cstester - a tool for testing loading and painting of documents

On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 05:46:04 Thorsten Zachmann wrote: > On Tuesday, January 18, 2011 14:24:38 Inge Wallin wrote: > > For Words, how about adding a dump of the text layout and compare > > that? That should be easier (and faster!) than generating and comparing > > bitmaps. The bitmaps th

Re: Flake tools at the bottom of the toolbox

On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 11:01:48 +0100, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > On Wednesday 19 January 2011, C. Boemann wrote: >> On Tuesday 18 January 2011, Sven Langkamp wrote: >> > We should think about the possibility to remove some of the flake >> tools. >> > At the moment we have two tools for gradient,

Re: cstester - a tool for testing loading and painting of documents

On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 09:59:10 Inge Wallin wrote: > On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 05:37:40 Thorsten Zachmann wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On Tuesday, January 18, 2011 14:17:00 Ganesh Paramasivam wrote: > > > Just a thought ( If this tool development is still in a early phase ). > > > > > >

Re: cstester - a tool for testing loading and painting of documents

On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 09:37:57 Alfredo Beaumont wrote: > Asteazkena 19 Urtarrila 2011(e)an, Thorsten Zachmann(e)k idatzi zuen: > > I think using ia virtual image would be the best here so it is also > > possible to run the tests on a different systems. Running it on the above > > hardware

Re: Flake tools at the bottom of the toolbox

On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > On Wednesday 19 January 2011, Sven Langkamp wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Boudewijn Rempt > wrote: > > > > > On Wednesday 19 January 2011, C. Boemann wrote: > > > > On Tuesday 18 January 2011, Sven Langkamp wrote: > > > >

Re: Flake tools at the bottom of the toolbox

On Wednesday 19 January 2011, Sven Langkamp wrote: > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > > > On Wednesday 19 January 2011, C. Boemann wrote: > > > On Tuesday 18 January 2011, Sven Langkamp wrote: > > > > We should think about the possibility to remove some of the flake > >

Re: Flake tools at the bottom of the toolbox

On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > On Wednesday 19 January 2011, C. Boemann wrote: > > On Tuesday 18 January 2011, Sven Langkamp wrote: > > > We should think about the possibility to remove some of the flake > tools. > > > At the moment we have two tools for gradient, path

Re: Flake tools at the bottom of the toolbox

On Wednesday 19 January 2011, C. Boemann wrote: > On Tuesday 18 January 2011, Sven Langkamp wrote: > > We should think about the possibility to remove some of the flake tools. > > At the moment we have two tools for gradient, path and freehand. > Combining gradient,pattern tools to one, and combini

Re: Flake tools at the bottom of the toolbox

On Tuesday 18 January 2011, Sven Langkamp wrote: > We should think about the possibility to remove some of the flake tools. > At the moment we have two tools for gradient, path and freehand. Combining gradient,pattern tools to one, and combining path and freehand tools is very much on my wishlist.

Re: cstester - a tool for testing loading and painting of documents

On Wednesday 19 January 2011, Thorsten Zachmann wrote: > Not sure how good it is to use git as the stuff put there will be documents > and > images which are basically binary data Maybe we should rename kofficetests to calligratests -- since we maintain it -- and add a new subdir there for you

Re: Flake tools at the bottom of the toolbox

On Tuesday 18 January 2011, Sven Langkamp wrote: > > A second toolbox wouldn't reduce inconsistency. I would have to be at the > top where the problem would still be the same, or at the bottom where it > would be like my solution. > If it's at the top, there's at least a clear separation. > >

Re: Development of FreOffice towards Calligra Mobile

On Tuesday 18 January 2011, suresh.cha...@nokia.com wrote: > In the last developer sprint we discussed about collecting all the APIs we > have used of the core engine for developing the UI, so that we can make these > APIs more stable. Yes, doing that is getting really urgent :-) -- Boudewijn

Re: cstester - a tool for testing loading and painting of documents

On 19 January 2011 09:27, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > On Tuesday 18 January 2011, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: >> On 18 January 2011 15:02, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: >> > On Tuesday 18 January 2011, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: >> >> Doesn't QPicture do something like that already? Or else we might >> >

Re: cstester - a tool for testing loading and painting of documents

On 19 January 2011 09:59, Inge Wallin wrote: > On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 05:37:40 Thorsten Zachmann wrote: >> Hello, >> >> On Tuesday, January 18, 2011 14:17:00 Ganesh Paramasivam wrote: >> > Just a thought ( If this tool development is still in a early phase ). >> > >> > Wouldn't this be eas

Re: cstester - a tool for testing loading and painting of documents

On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 05:37:40 Thorsten Zachmann wrote: > Hello, > > On Tuesday, January 18, 2011 14:17:00 Ganesh Paramasivam wrote: > > Just a thought ( If this tool development is still in a early phase ). > > > > Wouldn't this be easier with PDF instead of JPG. PDF ( If I'm right ) >

Re: cstester - a tool for testing loading and painting of documents

Asteazkena 19 Urtarrila 2011(e)an, Thorsten Zachmann(e)k idatzi zuen: > Hello, > > On Tuesday, January 18, 2011 14:21:44 Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > > On Tuesday 18 January 2011, Thorsten Zachmann wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > > > I'm currently working as part of my job for Nokia on cstester a too

Re: cstester - a tool for testing loading and painting of documents

On Wednesday 19 January 2011, Thorsten Zachmann wrote: > I think you are right that using this way should be platform independent. > Comapred to the image approach where you can look at and see if it shows > correctly with the representation you have chosen that is not possible > directly. > >

Re: cstester - a tool for testing loading and painting of documents

On Tuesday 18 January 2011, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > On 18 January 2011 15:02, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > > On Tuesday 18 January 2011, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > >> Doesn't QPicture do something like that already? Or else we might > >> compare the svg. > > > > Well QPicture is a binary format.

Re: Development of FreOffice towards Calligra Mobile

On Tuesday 18 January 2011, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > On 18 January 2011 22:07, wrote: > > As I received general supporting emails in renaming FreOffice to Calligra > > Mobile over email and IRC can I assume it is ok to proceed with renaming > > to Calligra Mobile ? We may also want to use a diff