On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 14:27:07 Inge Wallin wrote: > On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 05:46:04 Thorsten Zachmann wrote: > > On Tuesday, January 18, 2011 14:24:38 Inge Wallin wrote: > > > For Words, how about adding a dump of the text layout and compare > > > that? That should be easier (and faster!) than generating and > > > comparing bitmaps. The bitmaps themselves would also not give much > > > added information, especially if the goal is to find faulty layouts > > > which seems to be the biggest problem right now except for crashes. > > > > You see that as an additional feature or as replacement for the image > > based one. > > I relay like to keep the imaged based one as it also tests the code > > called during painting and that is quite different from the internal > > representation. > > My original reason for suggesting this is because I think that the image > based test is to fragile. If one single pixel is moved or changed just a > little bit, the test is failing. It can also sometimes be difficult to > see small differences in pictures.
True but that should not happen. > Since the dump of the layout will be text based, it will be much simpler to > spot differences. but it will not make sure the stuff is painted correctly. > I guess I see it as an addition rather than a replacement. The picture > approach is probably easier to create but more difficult to evaluate. Or > not. I'm not sure. > > Btw, are you going to produce a picture per page or one huge picture per > document? Per page. Thorsten _______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
