On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 05:37:40 Thorsten Zachmann wrote: > Hello, > > On Tuesday, January 18, 2011 14:17:00 Ganesh Paramasivam wrote: > > Just a thought ( If this tool development is still in a early phase ). > > > > Wouldn't this be easier with PDF instead of JPG. PDF ( If I'm right ) > > is nothing but a description of the layout data and handling PDF is > > more programming friendly ( i.e there are enough libraries available > > to read PDF ) than JPG's. > > the tool stores pngs. Storing pdfs would be also an option. However it has > the same problems as storing as pngs so there is no real benefit. > > The comarison of the imgae is very easy it is just a QByteArray == > QByteArray. There is nothing more used there. Not sure if it is as eays > with PDF as there might be meta data which differes.
If you are all right with the fact that the slightest little pixel change will make the test fail. I think for this to be feasible, we have to allow a certain small amount of differences. > Thorsten > _______________________________________________ > calligra-devel mailing list > calligra-devel@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel _______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
