On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 09:59:10 Inge Wallin wrote: > On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 05:37:40 Thorsten Zachmann wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On Tuesday, January 18, 2011 14:17:00 Ganesh Paramasivam wrote: > > > Just a thought ( If this tool development is still in a early phase ). > > > > > > Wouldn't this be easier with PDF instead of JPG. PDF ( If I'm right ) > > > is nothing but a description of the layout data and handling PDF is > > > more programming friendly ( i.e there are enough libraries available > > > to read PDF ) than JPG's. > > > > the tool stores pngs. Storing pdfs would be also an option. However it > > has the same problems as storing as pngs so there is no real benefit. > > > > The comarison of the imgae is very easy it is just a QByteArray == > > QByteArray. There is nothing more used there. Not sure if it is as eays > > with PDF as there might be meta data which differes. > > If you are all right with the fact that the slightest little pixel change > will make the test fail. I think for this to be feasible, we have to > allow a certain small amount of differences.
that is expected and I think it is one side a good think. When there should be no change there should be no change. It is very hard to say if there is a change if it is allowed or if it is an error. Most likely only a human can tell if the change is fine or not. Thorsten _______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
