Then that's how I'll re implement it.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Blake
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 14:08:50
To: Paul Eggert; Kieran Colford;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Removed sc_prohibit_strcmp from the syntax-check
On 05/21/2014 01:58 PM, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 05/21/
On 05/21/2014 01:58 PM, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 05/21/2014 11:54 AM, Kieran Colford wrote:
>> I definitely agree
>> with your suggestion of having a module put them in config.h
>
> Why config.h? Can't it be put into a new include file, supplied by
> Gnulib? stringops.h, say?We shouldn't bloat co
On 05/21/2014 11:54 AM, Kieran Colford wrote:
I definitely agree
with your suggestion of having a module put them in config.h
Why config.h? Can't it be put into a new include file, supplied by
Gnulib? stringops.h, say?We shouldn't bloat config.h unless we really
need to.
On 14-05-21 02:48 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 05/21/2014 12:00 PM, Kieran Colford wrote:
>> With the removal of STREQ and STRNEQ from gnulib, this syntax test is
>> no longer useful and simply generates a nuisance error message that
>> can't be fixed by gnulib.
>
> STREQ and STRNEQ have never been
On 05/21/2014 12:48 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 05/21/2014 12:00 PM, Kieran Colford wrote:
>> With the removal of STREQ and STRNEQ from gnulib, this syntax test is
>> no longer useful and simply generates a nuisance error message that
>> can't be fixed by gnulib.
>
> STREQ and STRNEQ have never bee
On 05/21/2014 12:00 PM, Kieran Colford wrote:
> With the removal of STREQ and STRNEQ from gnulib, this syntax test is
> no longer useful and simply generates a nuisance error message that
> can't be fixed by gnulib.
STREQ and STRNEQ have never been provided by a generic .h file in
gnulib, to my kn
With the removal of STREQ and STRNEQ from gnulib, this syntax test is
no longer useful and simply generates a nuisance error message that
can't be fixed by gnulib.
---
top/maint.mk |8
1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/top/maint.mk b/top/maint.mk
index b6cd5a2..5b345ad 1006
