Re: [arch-general] install problem

2012-01-12 Thread P NIKOLIC
Hi . It boot partly from the CD then get to a point saying at4 no responding and goes down the list to at1  than sits there doing nothing  . I cant do a screen capture  to show what is going on  my problem now is i have blown my suse install away to install this and it aint working  once i get

Re: [arch-general] install problem

2012-01-12 Thread P NIKOLIC
Right debug output   humm not easy  by the time the system has reached a usefull state it has all gone will change the way X and KDE start up and try capture some from the cousole   shortly .. Pete  (web mail is total pants) --- On Thu, 12/1/12, C Anthony Risinger wrote: From: C Anthony Risi

[arch-general] Another Major glitch now

2012-01-28 Thread P NIKOLIC
I have just updated the system  now on kde4.8 but all i get is kmix and a white screen noting else works at all  even that took 12 mins to  come up       (ps the update was a normal pacman -Suy ) Pete   (sent from webamil on the lappy cus main machine is futzed )

Re: [arch-general] Another Major glitch now

2012-01-28 Thread P NIKOLIC
Well it seems no help then it seems parts are working parts are not  so how do i set about  uninstalling KDE 4.8 and reverting to the previous working version  or is 4.8 the new viersion now if so it has problems Pete . --- On Sat, 28/1/12, P NIKOLIC wrote: From: P NIKOLIC Subject

Re: [arch-general] Another Major glitch now

2012-01-28 Thread P NIKOLIC
. --- On Sat, 28/1/12, G. Schlisio wrote: From: G. Schlisio Subject: Re: [arch-general] Another Major glitch now To: arch-general@archlinux.org Date: Saturday, 28 January, 2012, 16:39 Am 28.01.2012 17:35, schrieb P NIKOLIC: > Well it seems no help then     it seems parts are working parts are not 

Re: [arch-general] Another Major glitch now

2012-01-28 Thread P NIKOLIC
y, 28 January, 2012, 16:52 Am 28.01.2012 17:49, schrieb P NIKOLIC: > Hi .. > > It seems for some strange reason the Hard disk may be full  well the / > partition at least si the install may not have completed  now have to think > about this one  see if i can resize the / partition i

Re: [arch-general] Another Major glitch now

2012-01-28 Thread P NIKOLIC
Date: Saturday, 28 January, 2012, 17:54 Le 28/01/2012 18:41, P NIKOLIC a écrit : >> It seems for some strange reason the Hard disk may be full  well the / >> partition at least si the install may not have completed  now have to think >> about this one  see if i can resize the

[arch-general] /usr on a seperate drive

2012-01-28 Thread P NIKOLIC
Hi . Well still fighting it  how does one go about putting /usr on a seperate drive  i can not seem to get it right just complains about /usr mounted unable to e2fsck cannot continue and falls to maintenance mode  i cant unmount the drive because it contains /usr how do im get rount that one th

[arch-general] Kmail 2 problems

2012-02-01 Thread P Nikolic
Hi .. I am getting the following error on mail check Local Folders: Error opening: This folder is missing . I also get complaints about unable to delete (long number) on Kmail2 startup not sure if it is related but i have also had big problems with Akondai when trying to add my saved calender

Re: [arch-general] Kmail 2 problems

2012-02-01 Thread P NIKOLIC
Paul Gideon Dann wrote: From: Paul Gideon Dann Subject: Re: [arch-general] Kmail 2 problems To: arch-general@archlinux.org Date: Wednesday, 1 February, 2012, 11:17 On Wednesday 01 Feb 2012 08:44:25 P Nikolic wrote: > I am getting the following error on mail check > > Local Folders:

Re: [arch-general] Kmail 2 problems

2012-02-01 Thread P Nikolic
On Wednesday 01 Feb 2012 15:39:34 Paul Gideon Dann wrote: > On Wednesday 01 Feb 2012 15:30:15 P NIKOLIC wrote: > > Sorry for the top posting back to web mail cus Kmail2 just eats > > everything > > baring the junk . > > No worries. > > > I am using pop3

Re: [arch-general] Kmail 2 problems

2012-02-01 Thread P Nikolic
On Wednesday 01 Feb 2012 16:15:23 Paul Gideon Dann wrote: > On Wednesday 01 Feb 2012 15:51:57 P Nikolic wrote: > > Well if this gets thru it may well be getting there i have completely > > deleted all the accounts and re done them but getting used to that now so > > does not

[arch-general] Google earth

2012-02-01 Thread P Nikolic
Well Kmail seems to be a little better behaved now thanks for the help . Now got Google earth installed (loads of 32 bit stuff added from multilib) now it starts up then bombs out after a few seconds with an error report as Major Version 6 Minor Version 2 Build Number Build Date Jan 23

Re: [arch-general] Google earth

2012-02-01 Thread P Nikolic
On Wednesday 01 Feb 2012 19:48:08 P Nikolic wrote: > Well > > Kmail seems to be a little better behaved now thanks for the help . > > Now got Google earth installed (loads of 32 bit stuff added from multilib) > now it starts up then bombs out after a few seconds with an

Re: [arch-general] Google earth

2012-02-01 Thread P Nikolic
On Wednesday 01 Feb 2012 22:47:47 Jesse Juhani Jaara wrote: > keskiviikko, 1. helmikuuta 2012 20:37:36 P Nikolic kirjoitti: > > I am running the nouveau driver not the Nvidia i have tried to > > install > > lib32-nvidia-utils but got the report below do i take it that

Re: [arch-general] Google earth

2012-02-01 Thread P Nikolic
On Wednesday 01 Feb 2012 23:03:04 Jesse Juhani Jaara wrote: > keskiviikko, 1. helmikuuta 2012 20:55:36 P Nikolic kirjoitti: > > driver to get Google earth to behave or can i tell pacman to deinstall > > the > > libgl and install the nvidia-utils (or are the nvidia-uti

Re: [arch-general] Google earth

2012-02-01 Thread P Nikolic
On Wednesday 01 Feb 2012 23:17:27 Ionut Biru wrote: > On 02/01/2012 11:11 PM, P Nikolic wrote: > > On Wednesday 01 Feb 2012 23:03:04 Jesse Juhani Jaara wrote: > >> keskiviikko, 1. helmikuuta 2012 20:55:36 P Nikolic kirjoitti: > >>> driver to get Google earth to b

[arch-general] ntp settings

2012-02-05 Thread P Nikolic
Hi . I am trying to set the timezone up correctly and setup ntp to run . I have tried using System Settings in KDE but for some reason it does not accept the password . If i enter the password (root password) it reply's failed to Authenticate and greys everyting out for a few secondsi ha

Re: [arch-general] ntp settings

2012-02-05 Thread P Nikolic
On Sunday 05 Feb 2012 21:01:04 Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Sun, 2012-02-05 at 18:37 +0000, P Nikolic wrote: > > Hi . > > > > I am trying to set the timezone up correctly and setup ntp to run . > > > > I have tried using System Settings in KDE but for some reason it

Re: [arch-general] ntp settings

2012-02-05 Thread P Nikolic
On Sunday 05 Feb 2012 21:48:54 Lukas Fleischer wrote: > On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 08:31:11PM +0000, P Nikolic wrote: > > On Sunday 05 Feb 2012 21:01:04 Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > > On Sun, 2012-02-05 at 18:37 +, P Nikolic wrote: > > > > Hi . > > > >

[arch-general] "Unable to contact the timeserver"

2012-02-05 Thread P Nikolic
Hi .. Thanks to the helper on the previos thread nw another one when i select an ntp server enter the password (users password) i get the Unable to contact the timeserver errori can ping the server from a terminal no problem Pete . -- Linux 7-of-9 3.2.2-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Th

[arch-general] backing up a blackberry phone

2012-02-07 Thread P Nikolic
Hi .. I have a Balckberry Curve i could do with backing up again on suse i used to use BarryBackup has anyone provided this for Arch or what do people use to backup their Balckberrys .. Cheers Pete . -- Linux 7-of-9 3.2.4-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Sat Feb 4 10:53:01 CET 2012 x86_64 AMD

Re: [arch-general] backing up a blackberry phone

2012-02-07 Thread P Nikolic
On Tuesday 07 Feb 2012 16:45:52 Matthew Gyurgyik wrote: > On 02/07/2012 04:31 PM, P Nikolic wrote: > > Hi .. > > > > I have a Balckberry Curve i could do with backing up again on suse i > > used to use BarryBackup has anyone provided this for Arch or what do >

Re: [arch-general] backing up a blackberry phone (solved)

2012-02-07 Thread P Nikolic
On Tuesday 07 Feb 2012 21:58:38 P Nikolic wrote: > On Tuesday 07 Feb 2012 16:45:52 Matthew Gyurgyik wrote: > > On 02/07/2012 04:31 PM, P Nikolic wrote: > > > Hi .. > > > > > > I have a Balckberry Curve i could do with backing up again on suse i > > >

[arch-general] DPMS

2012-02-09 Thread P Nikolic
Morning folk Back to this one again i need to find a working position for "xset -dpms" i am getting sick and tired of every time i reboot i get the darn screens turning off i hate that with vengance if i wqnt them off i turn them off simples So where can i put the xset command for it t

Re: [arch-general] DPMS

2012-02-09 Thread P Nikolic
On Thursday 09 Feb 2012 10:54:15 Christoph Vigano wrote: > On 02/09/2012 10:37 AM, P Nikolic wrote: > > Morning folk > > > > > > Back to this one again i need to find a working position for "xset > > -dpms" i am getting sick and tired of every time

Re: [arch-general] DPMS

2012-02-09 Thread P Nikolic
On Thursday 09 Feb 2012 16:11:05 gt wrote: > On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 09:59:44AM +0000, P Nikolic wrote: > > On Thursday 09 Feb 2012 10:54:15 Christoph Vigano wrote: > > > On 02/09/2012 10:37 AM, P Nikolic wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > &g

Re: [arch-general] DPMS

2012-02-09 Thread P Nikolic
On Thursday 09 Feb 2012 20:19:06 gt wrote: > On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 02:13:57PM +0000, P Nikolic wrote: > > On Thursday 09 Feb 2012 16:11:05 gt wrote: > > > How do you login? i.e., which login manager do you use? > > > > i use KDM > > I don't think that

Re: [arch-general] DPMS

2012-02-09 Thread P Nikolic
On Thursday 09 Feb 2012 17:22:44 Madeye wrote: > On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:46:52 + > > P Nikolic wrote: > > On Thursday 09 Feb 2012 20:19:06 gt wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 02:13:57PM +, P Nikolic wrote: > > > > On Thursday 09 Feb 2012 16:11:05

Re: [arch-general] DPMS

2012-02-09 Thread P Nikolic
On Thursday 09 Feb 2012 19:04:24 P Nikolic wrote: > On Thursday 09 Feb 2012 17:22:44 Madeye wrote: > > On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:46:52 + > > > > P Nikolic wrote: > > > On Thursday 09 Feb 2012 20:19:06 gt wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 02:13

Re: [arch-general] DPMS

2012-02-11 Thread P Nikolic
On Saturday 11 Feb 2012 20:36:56 Damjan wrote: > > Morning folk > > > > > > Back to this one again i need to find a working position for "xset > > -dpms" i am getting sick and tired of every time i reboot i get the darn > > screens turning off i hate that with vengance if i wqnt them off i t

Re: [arch-general] Possible hard drive failure, DMA errors.

2012-02-12 Thread P Nikolic
On Sunday 12 Feb 2012 17:38:12 Jordan Windsor wrote: > On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Jordan Windsor wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 8:29 AM, Mauro Santos > > Snippage > > I checked the cables many times, including the SATA ports used, the > hard drive wouldn't work in any configuration. >

Re: [arch-general] Join my network on LinkedIn

2012-02-13 Thread P Nikolic
On Monday 13 Feb 2012 18:20:03 Alfredo Palhares wrote: > Please avoid things like this. > > Just the fact that linkedin reads your email contacts and sends this shows > the "profesionalism" of it. yes i get so many unwanted linkedin mails they are a PITA Pete . -- Linux 7-of-9 3.2.5-1-ARCH #1

[arch-general] Kmail crashes

2012-02-14 Thread P Nikolic
Hi all . Kmail seems to have developed a like for just vanishing like bang gone . I had to reboot the box this morning to get kmail to start at all as in power off reboot then it can up with no mails listed no inbox nothing another reboot and it came up ok but now just vanishes from t

Re: [arch-general] Kmail crashes

2012-02-14 Thread P Nikolic
On Tuesday 14 Feb 2012 08:22:46 P Nikolic wrote: > Hi all . > > Kmail seems to have developed a like for just vanishing like bang gone . > > I had to reboot the box this morning to get kmail to start at all as in > power off reboot then it can up with no mails listed

Re: [arch-general] Kmail crashes

2012-02-14 Thread P Nikolic
On Tuesday 14 Feb 2012 08:22:46 P Nikolic wrote: > Hi all . > > Kmail seems to have developed a like for just vanishing like bang gone . > > I had to reboot the box this morning to get kmail to start at all as in > power off reboot then it can up with no mails listed

[arch-general] crashes

2012-02-15 Thread P Nikolic
Hi I am getting logs full of the following along with bad crazy Kmail behaviour Also problems writing to my NAS drive i dare say the NAS problem is me not finding the right setting ( i have been a suse user since suse 5.3 so a long time with yast) any ideas anyone Feb 15 09:38:05 7-of-

Re: [arch-general] crashes

2012-02-17 Thread P Nikolic
On Thursday 16 Feb 2012 17:43:30 David C. Rankin wrote: > On 02/15/2012 08:43 AM, P Nikolic wrote: > > Hi > > > > I am getting logs full of the following along with bad crazy Kmail > > behaviour Also problems writing to my NAS drive i dare say the NAS > > pr

Re: [arch-general] crashes

2012-02-19 Thread P Nikolic
On Sunday 19 Feb 2012 10:49:40 David C. Rankin wrote: > On 02/17/2012 02:14 AM, P Nikolic wrote: > > That is a mighty good question it is a deaktop machine i run 2 21" LCD > > displays maybe it is detecting those and setting it accordingly one is > > VGA > > c

[arch-general] NAS drive read ok cant write

2012-02-20 Thread P Nikolic
Hi . I have an Iomega NAS drive that i used to be able to read and write to using opensuse now i need to write to it and am completely unable to i can still read from it . I have 2 directory on it mounted using mount.cifs //192.168.0.154/music /home/pete/Music -o user= pass=pass mo

Re: [arch-general] NAS drive read ok cant write

2012-02-20 Thread P Nikolic
On Monday 20 Feb 2012 17:40:59 Jesse Juhani Jaara wrote: > chown -R > your_user_name:users_or_some_another_group_you_wanna_assing_as_owener > /foo/bar > > man chown > > something like: > chown -R pete:users /home/pete/M{usic,ovies} > > should do it, remebr to run it as root. But be avare that th

[arch-general] quick test

2012-02-20 Thread P Nikolic
Quick test list seems very quite is it .. Pete . -- Linux 7-of-9 3.2.6-2-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Thu Feb 16 10:10:02 CET 2012 x86_64 AMD Phenom(tm) 9600B Quad-Core Processor AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux

Re: [arch-general] NAS drive read ok cant write

2012-02-20 Thread P Nikolic
On Monday 20 Feb 2012 16:04:30 P Nikolic wrote: > On Monday 20 Feb 2012 17:40:59 Jesse Juhani Jaara wrote: > > chown -R > > your_user_name:users_or_some_another_group_you_wanna_assing_as_owener > > /foo/bar > > > > man chown > > > > something like: &g

Re: [arch-general] USB mounted into "wrong" directory

2012-04-06 Thread P .NIKOLIC
On Thu, 5 Apr 2012 20:10:59 +0200 Tom Gundersen wrote: > > Nothing should ever require you to disable automounting. The default > should be not to mount new devices, anything else sounds like a bug > to me. -1 Pete . -- Linux 7-of-9 3.2.13-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Sat Mar 24 09:10:39 CET 201

Re: [arch-general] gpg key gen failure

2012-04-14 Thread P .NIKOLIC
On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 22:28:24 -0400 Evan LeCompte wrote: > Can you tell us what command you tried to run to generate your key > pair? > > On 15/03/12 at 10:29pm, pete wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 21:09:28 + > > pete wrote: > > > > > Hi . > > > > > > I have just tried to generate a key pa

[arch-general] findutils and locate

2012-04-15 Thread P .NIKOLIC
Hi . How can i return full function to the findutils and locate , It was the best utility for the job and now has been eroded by the supposed replacements that are a complete failure . I want my old locate command back and working as it always used to never failed to find what i wanted Oh and

Re: [arch-general] findutils and locate

2012-04-15 Thread P .NIKOLIC
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 13:00:19 +0200 Martti Kühne wrote: > On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 06:33:58PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > > On 15/04/12 18:15, P .NIKOLIC wrote: > > > How can i return full function to the findutils and locate , It > > > was the best utility for the job

Re: [arch-general] findutils and locate

2012-04-15 Thread P .NIKOLIC
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 21:43:44 +1000 Allan McRae wrote: > On 15/04/12 21:24, Martti Kühne wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 09:09:11PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > >> > >> It was not trolling but serious advise. If you can not do basic > >> research, Arch is not the distribution for you. > > > >

Re: [arch-general] findutils and locate

2012-04-15 Thread P .NIKOLIC
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 15:41:55 +0200 Martti Kühne wrote: > On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 01:49:41PM +0100, P .NIKOLIC wrote: > > > > Right mlocate is installed updatedb takes no time it is instant it > > fails to read a thing .. it attempts to reads the NAS drive that > >

Re: [arch-general] findutils and locate

2012-04-15 Thread P .NIKOLIC
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 22:13:33 +0530 gt wrote: > On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 04:38:01PM +0100, P .NIKOLIC wrote: > > Right my /etc/updatedb.conf is as follows > > # directories to exclude from the slocate database: > > PRUNEPATHS="/media /mnt /tmp /var/tmp /var/cache /v

Re: [arch-general] findutils and locate

2012-04-15 Thread P .NIKOLIC
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 23:49:45 +0200 Martti Kühne wrote: > On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 05:51:36PM +0100, P .NIKOLIC wrote: > > Hi .. > > > > Yes it is there .. > > > > -rw-r- 1 root locate 7868436 Apr 15 13:48 mlocate.db > > > > Doing a strings o

Re: [arch-general] findutils and locate

2012-04-16 Thread P .NIKOLIC
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 23:53:21 +0100 Mauro Santos wrote: > On 15-04-2012 23:10, P .NIKOLIC wrote: > > On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 23:49:45 +0200 > > Martti Kühne wrote: > > > > something failing on my guess would be a changed permission > > somewhere althou i dont mess a

Re: [arch-general] findutils and locate

2012-04-16 Thread P .NIKOLIC
On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 13:13:41 +0530 gt wrote: > On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 08:22:03AM +0100, P .NIKOLIC wrote: > > -rwxr-sr-x 1 root locate 39512 Mar 3 05:53 /usr/bin/locate > > > > it is running with the default as you can see this is getting a bit > > strange to sa

Re: [arch-general] [Bulk] Re: RFC: OpenRC as init system for Arch

2012-04-28 Thread P .NIKOLIC
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 12:51:11 +0800 Patrick Lauer wrote: > No need for systemd at all :) As someone that has used Linux exclusively since the very early days kernel version 0.99-a i have to say +1 to no need for systemd at allit is just another un-needed uncalled for over complication of

[arch-general] NAS drive revisited

2012-05-20 Thread P .NIKOLIC
Hi .. I am still not able to write to my external NAS drive an iomega home media drive So lets approach it from a different angle we will say i have not done anything yet just plugged it into the network What packages am i looking to install and what configuration changes do i need to make

Re: [arch-general] NAS drive revisited

2012-05-20 Thread P .NIKOLIC
On Sun, 20 May 2012 18:09:13 -0400 Loui Chang wrote: > On Sun 20 May 2012 21:58 +0100, P .NIKOLIC wrote: > > I am still not able to write to my external NAS drive an iomega home > > media drive > > You just can't write? If you can mount but can't write, then you

Re: [arch-general] NAS drive revisited

2012-05-20 Thread P .NIKOLIC
On Sun, 20 May 2012 23:17:14 +0200 Damjan wrote: > > > I am still not able to write to my external NAS drive an iomega home > > media drive > > > > So lets approach it from a different angle > > > > we will say i have not done anything yet just plugged it into the > > network > > > > What packag

Re: [arch-general] NAS drive revisited

2012-05-20 Thread P .NIKOLIC
On Mon, 21 May 2012 01:20:21 +0200 Damjan wrote: > > I have read the Arch Wiki till i am blue in the face already hence > > the mail .. > > > > > > mounting with SMB using the line below > > > > mount -t cifs //192.168.0.154/backups -o /home/pete/nas/ > > > > After entering the password it moun

Re: [arch-general] NAS drive revisited

2012-05-20 Thread P .NIKOLIC
On Mon, 21 May 2012 00:11:38 -0300 Martin Cigorraga wrote: > Hi Nikolic, > If you don't plan to share your NAS with (nasty and mediocre) Windows > systems you should mount it as a NFS4 share, I use it to access my > download and media home servers from various PCs in my home and it's > quite a sm

[arch-general] Mirrors

2012-05-31 Thread P .NIKOLIC
Hi .. I am getting lots of errors from the mirror.lividpenguin.com stating : Given file does not exist is this mirror having problems or should i remove it from my mirrors list this has been an issue for best part of a week now Pete . -- Linux 7-of-9 3.3.7-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Tue

Re: [arch-general] Mirrors

2012-05-31 Thread P .NIKOLIC
On Thu, 31 May 2012 08:33:46 +0100 Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote: > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 8:19 AM, P .NIKOLIC > wrote: > > > > Hi .. > > > > I am getting lots of errors from the  mirror.lividpenguin.com > > stating : Given file does not exist   is this mi

Re: [arch-general] Mirrors

2012-05-31 Thread P .NIKOLIC
On Thu, 31 May 2012 16:46:36 +0530 gt wrote: > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 10:34:05AM +0100, P .NIKOLIC wrote: > > On Thu, 31 May 2012 08:33:46 +0100 > > Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote: > > > > > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 8:19 AM, P .NIKOLIC > > > wrote: >

[arch-general] /usr/bin/X: error while loading shared libraries: libudev.so.0:

2012-06-03 Thread P .NIKOLIC
Hi . I have just run pacman -Suy rebooted the system and found i could not start X getting the error message /usr/bin/X: error while loading shared libraries: libudev.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory .. Someone has suggested the fixed version of X but it is n

Re: [arch-general] /usr/bin/X: error while loading shared libraries: libudev.so.0:

2012-06-03 Thread P .NIKOLIC
On Sun, 3 Jun 2012 20:40:48 -0500 Leonid Isaev wrote: > On Sun, 3 Jun 2012 23:52:05 +0100 > "P .NIKOLIC" wrote: > > > Hi . > > > > I have just run pacman -Suy rebooted the system and found i could > > not start X getting the error message

Re: [arch-general] /usr/bin/X: error while loading shared libraries: libudev.so.0:

2012-06-04 Thread P .NIKOLIC
On Mon, 4 Jun 2012 15:42:30 +0800 Oon-Ee Ng wrote: > On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 2:34 PM, P .NIKOLIC > wrote: > > Since you  seem to be in snotty mode  that i neither asked for nor > > required.   if the mirrors were up to date then this sort of thing > > would not happ

[arch-general] update problem maybe ..

2012-06-07 Thread P .NIKOLIC
Hi Just done a "pacman -Syu" i get the following error below is there a recomended way around the problem of var/lock and var/run is it safe to delete them to update . resolving dependencies... looking for inter-conflicts... Targets (6): filesystem-2012.6-2 git-1.7.10.4-1 icu-49.1.2-1 kr

Re: [arch-general] update problem maybe ..

2012-06-07 Thread P .NIKOLIC
On Thu, 7 Jun 2012 20:04:10 +0100 "P .NIKOLIC" wrote: > Hi > > Just done a "pacman -Syu" i get the following error below > is there a recomended way around the problem of var/lock and var/run > is it safe to delete them to update . > > > >

Re: [arch-general] update problem maybe ..

2012-06-07 Thread P .NIKOLIC
On Thu, 07 Jun 2012 14:52:25 -0500 "David C. Rankin" wrote: > On 06/07/2012 02:35 PM, P .NIKOLIC wrote: > > Thanks folks.. > > > > Now to tackle the laptop and get it ready for a couple of months > > duty whilst laid up in dang hospital .. > > >

Re: [arch-general] update problem maybe ..

2012-06-07 Thread P .NIKOLIC
On Fri, 8 Jun 2012 00:52:31 -0500 Myra Nelson wrote: > On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 5:08 PM, P .NIKOLIC > wrote: > > On Thu, 07 Jun 2012 14:52:25 -0500 > > "David C. Rankin" wrote: > > > >> On 06/07/2012 02:35 PM, P .NIKOLIC wrote: > >> > Thanks

[arch-general] 20:49:23.023183 IP0 bad-hlen 0

2012-06-09 Thread P .NIKOLIC
Hi All whilst running tcpdump i have noticed i am getting a considerable number of these 20:49:18.899106 IP0 bad-hlen 0 20:49:23.023183 IP0 bad-hlen 0 They have only shown up recently , I am also getting hit by someone with their iPhone trying all sorts of sillys could the 2 be linked

Re: [arch-general] Muting internal speakers

2012-06-15 Thread P .NIKOLIC
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 11:04:30 +0200 Heiko Baums wrote: > Am Fri, 15 Jun 2012 10:17:45 +0300 > schrieb Chris Sakalis : > > > Hello, > > pulseaudio[1] has that functionality. You should check it out. On > > KDE , Kmix supports pulseaudio and I am pretty sure it support auto > > switching too. > >

Re: [arch-general] Leap seconds ntp and chrony?

2012-07-03 Thread P .NIKOLIC
On Mon, 2 Jul 2012 23:58:24 +0100 Kevin Chadwick wrote: > > > My setup was with dcron and ntp. > > > > Considering servers don't get chance to run the RTC battery down. > > I've never understood why everyone uses NTP which is an unneeded > > security risk anyway (OpenBSDs ain't bad). Do we think

Re: [arch-general] Leap seconds ntp and chrony?

2012-07-03 Thread P .NIKOLIC
On Tue, 03 Jul 2012 18:48:44 +0200 Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Tue, 2012-07-03 at 08:40 +0100, P .NIKOLIC wrote: > > Is your system of national importance NO do you have top secret > > millitary info on your system NO > > You're mistaken Pete, > > if we would tal

[arch-general] segfaults and call trace

2012-07-09 Thread P .NIKOLIC
Hi I am all of a sudden getting lots of these Call Trace reports in the log and just prior to that was having Jul 9 10:12:03 7-of-9 kernel: [ 9092.341622] claws-mail[2310] general protection ip:7feef8e5b2f1 sp:7fff657bdcd0 error:0 in libhogweed.so.2.1[7feef8e5+12000] Jul 9 10:12:36 7-of-

Re: [arch-general] segfaults and call trace

2012-07-09 Thread P .NIKOLIC
On Mon, 9 Jul 2012 10:31:05 -0500 Leonid Isaev wrote: > On Mon, 9 Jul 2012 13:39:44 +0100 > "P .NIKOLIC" wrote: > > > > > Hi I am all of a sudden getting lots of these Call Trace reports > > in the log and just prior to that was having > > >

[arch-general] Glibc problems still failing

2012-07-16 Thread P NIKOLIC
Hi . Well i have followed the the info on the arch site but still can not upgrade glibc  i get this error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files) glibc: /lib exists in filesystem glibc: /usr/lib/ld-2.16.so exists in filesystem glibc: /usr/lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 exists in filesyst

Re: [arch-general] Glibc problems still failing

2012-07-16 Thread P .NIKOLIC
On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 20:33:15 +0900 Vladimir Lomov wrote: > Hello, > ** P NIKOLIC [2012-07-16 11:04:31 +0100]: > > Pruned for space > > How about to post results of > $ pacman -Qo /lib/* > and > $ grep '^lib/' /var/lib/pacman/local/*/files | grep -v glibc

[arch-general] Still Glibc problems

2012-07-17 Thread P .NIKOLIC
Right then Hi .. I have followed all there is to follow tried all i can find to try yet i am still getting error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files) glibc: /lib exists in filesystem glibc: /usr/lib/ld-2.16.so exists in filesystem glibc: /usr/lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 exists in fil

Re: [arch-general] Still Glibc problems

2012-07-17 Thread P .NIKOLIC
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 17:27:35 +0200 Tom Gundersen wrote: Pruned > > Hm how did /lib end up as a symlink to /usr/lib without those > files being owned by glibc? Did you just copy it over manually and > create the link yourself? > > -t Quite easily I followed what was on the Arch web site an

Re: [arch-general] Still Glibc problems

2012-07-17 Thread P .NIKOLIC
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 18:27:24 +0200 Guus Snijders wrote: > Op 17 jul. 2012 18:01 schreef "P .NIKOLIC" > het volgende: > > > > On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 17:27:35 +0200 > > Tom Gundersen wrote: > > > > Pruned > > > > > > Hm how di

Re: [arch-general] Still Glibc problems

2012-07-17 Thread P .NIKOLIC
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 17:27:35 +0200 Tom Gundersen wrote: > > Hm how did /lib end up as a symlink to /usr/lib without those > files being owned by glibc? Did you just copy it over manually and > create the link yourself? > > -t Right after much faffing about i now have the box back to

Re: [arch-general] Still Glibc problems

2012-07-18 Thread P .NIKOLIC
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 00:46:49 +0200 Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:19 AM, P .NIKOLIC > wrote: > > Right after much faffing about i now have the box back to > > So if /lib is NOT a symlink, then all you should need is to delete all > the files in /usr/l

Re: [arch-general] Still Glibc problems

2012-07-18 Thread P .NIKOLIC
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 09:09:18 +0200 Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 3:11 AM, Andrew Hills > wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > >> So if /lib is NOT a symlink, then all you should need is to delete > >> all the files in /usr/lib that are not owned by

Re: [arch-general] Still Glibc problems

2012-07-18 Thread P .NIKOLIC
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 09:22:53 +0200 Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 9:19 AM, P .NIKOLIC > wrote: > > On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 00:46:49 +0200 > > Tom Gundersen wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:19 AM, P .NIKOLIC > >> wrote: > &g

Re: [arch-general] Still Glibc problems

2012-07-18 Thread P .NIKOLIC
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 07:27:57 -0400 Alex Belanger wrote: > pacman -Syu --ignore glibc > pacman -Su > I had the same problem, went to archlinux website and they say > exactly what you need to do and why. You shouldn't toy with it > yourself, nor use the --force option. Try this, if it doesn't work,

Re: [arch-general] Still Glibc problems

2012-07-18 Thread P .NIKOLIC
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 12:27:11 +0200 Tom Gundersen wrote: Pruned > > You sholud delete the duplicate files from /usr/lib, did you do this? > Then it _should_ work... > > -t Hi Tom Ok i will give it a whirl see what transpires CheersPete -- Linux 7-of-9 3.4.4-3-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Tue

Re: [arch-general] Still Glibc problems

2012-07-18 Thread P .NIKOLIC
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 12:27:11 +0200 Tom Gundersen wrote: Pruned > > You sholud delete the duplicate files from /usr/lib, did you do this? > Then it _should_ work... > > -t Hi Tom Well word on the street is it seems to have worked at last now i have another problem cropped up for which i wil

[arch-general] New glitch since latest update

2012-07-18 Thread P .NIKOLIC
Hi folks . Well having finally got the Glibc thing sorted and done a "pacman -Syu" which pulled in kernel ect when i try to start Kaffeine it takes almost 2 mins to finally show up , When started from an xterm i get the following errors QDBusConnection: session D-Bus connection created be

Re: [arch-general] claws-mail is it possible to see own posts to mailinglist?

2012-07-19 Thread P .NIKOLIC
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 09:16:57 +0200 Tobias Powalowski wrote: > Hi, > I have a big problem with claws-mail, is it somehow possible to see > own posts to mailinglists? > I'm using gmail imap and somehow my own posts are not shown. > Thunderbird does not have this issue. > > greetings > tpowa I have

Re: [arch-general] My end-user $0.02 on /etc/rc.conf splitting.

2012-07-22 Thread P .NIKOLIC
On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 16:17:13 +0200 Karol Babioch wrote: > > Maybe this is what it is really about: These changes come - more or > less > - from Poettering and there is quite a bunch of people who for > whatever reasons don't like that idea. Most certainly not liked at all in my view it makes

[arch-general] / mounted ro after update

2012-09-13 Thread P .NIKOLIC
Hi folks Having been in hospital for a while i updated this system a couple of days ago and am having some strange problems If i run pacman -Syu i get 7-of-9:/ # pacman -Syu :: Synchronising package databases... error: failed to update core (unable to lock database) error: failed to update

Re: [arch-general] / mounted ro after update

2012-09-13 Thread P .NIKOLIC
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012 22:29:02 +0530 Aurko Roy wrote: > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 10:05 PM, P .NIKOLIC > wrote: > > > Hi folks > > > > Having been in hospital for a while i updated this system a couple > > of days ago and am having some strange problems > >

Re: [arch-general] / mounted ro after update

2012-09-15 Thread P .NIKOLIC
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012 22:29:02 +0530 Aurko Roy wrote: > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 10:05 PM, P .NIKOLIC > wrote: > > > Hi folks > > > > Having been in hospital for a while i updated this system a couple > > of days ago and am having some strange problems > >

Re: [arch-general] / mounted ro after update

2012-09-15 Thread P .NIKOLIC
On Sat, 15 Sep 2012 17:10:15 +0100 Andy Pieters wrote: > Hi > > Pete > > On 15 September 2012 13:02, P .NIKOLIC > wrote: > > On Thu, 13 Sep 2012 22:29:02 +0530 > > Aurko Roy wrote: > >> > > >> > Hints please where to look i have compared

Re: [arch-general] / mounted ro after update

2012-09-18 Thread P .NIKOLIC
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:01:26 -0500 "David C. Rankin" wrote: > On 09/15/2012 11:24 AM, P .NIKOLIC wrote: > > Of course noone else will offer any assistance will they EH! > > > > Pete . > > Pete, > >You know me, I'm never quite to the

Re: [arch-general] / mounted ro after update

2012-09-18 Thread P .NIKOLIC
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 17:18:50 -0500 German Cabarcas wrote: > I had a problem of this sort recently, due to my root partition being > full, so i went ahead and performed a: > > # pacman -Sc > > Before trying to update once again and things were rolling as normal > back again, hope it helps. > >

Re: [arch-general] / mounted ro after update

2012-09-18 Thread P .NIKOLIC
ould well be both partitions that have the problem are ext4 why i did not change them to my more normal XFS i dont know .. I may have to back a lot up and rebuild but this time i will let my normal hate of the entire EXT file system rule and go XFS never been let down there .. Pete . > >

Re: [arch-general] / mounted ro after update

2012-09-18 Thread P .NIKOLIC
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 12:07:55 +0100 Kevin Chadwick wrote: > > all disc ID's are correct so what has been screwed up this was > > perfect until the update or am i going to be forced to > > re-install not an option i look forward to > > A workaround rather than a fix but may help investigate o

Re: [arch-general] / mounted ro after update

2012-09-19 Thread P .NIKOLIC
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 14:26:32 -0500 "David C. Rankin" wrote: > On 09/18/2012 03:53 AM, P .NIKOLIC wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 03:47:26 -0400 (EDT) > > Jude DaShiell wrote: > > > >> >Whenever does an install of archlinux, they also do a big update >

Re: [arch-general] / mounted ro after update

2012-09-21 Thread P .NIKOLIC
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 14:26:54 +0100 "P .NIKOLIC" wrote: > On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 12:07:55 +0100 > Kevin Chadwick wrote: > > > > all disc ID's are correct so what has been screwed up this was > > > perfect until the update or am i going to be forced

  1   2   >