Re: [arch-general] extra/progsreiserfs duplicate of core/reiserfsprogs?

Guillaume ALAUX wrote: > Hello, > > Correct me if I'm wrong but it looks like extra/progsreiserfs > (0.3.0.5-5) is an old duplicate of core/reiserfsprogs (3.6.21-3). > > I search for reasons in mailing list archives for having both but found > none. > > Nb: Old extra/progsreiserfs PKGBUILD [

Re: [arch-general] extra/progsreiserfs duplicate of core/reiserfsprogs?

Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: > Guillaume ALAUX wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Correct me if I'm wrong but it looks like > extra/progsreiserfs >> (0.3.0.5-5) is an old duplicate of core/reiserfsprogs > (3.6.21-3). >> >> I search for reasons in mail

Re: [arch-general] extra/progsreiserfs duplicate of core/reiserfsprogs?

Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: > Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: > >> >> See my comments on https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9029 >> Tpowa must know something we dont and must be using it. >> > > Most likely cause of the reasons mentioned here: > http://bugs.gento

[arch-general] xorg-font-utils package reorganization

Hi, the previous xorg-font-utils package included 2 utilities that are not available anymore. fonttosfnt and ttmkfdir2 can not be found as split packages but AFAIK they are not part of any other joint packages either. What happens to them? Will they be available in the future or they're dropped com

Re: [arch-general] xorg-font-utils package reorganization

On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 08:44 +0100, "Jan de Groot" wrote: > > ttmkfdir is a redhat-specific tool, I haven't seen other distributions > including that. I decided to drop that one. Never seen it elsewhere either. > The fonttosfnt tool is deprecated so I decided to drop that unless someone > might rea

Re: [arch-general] inefficient handling of bug reports?

Angus wrote: >> When I file a bug report with the Flyspray web interface, why can't I >> specify the package it concerns? Having that option should make it >> possible for the package maintainers to be immediately and >> automatically notified of the report. >> >> The way it works now seems to be

Re: [arch-general] inefficient handling of bug reports?

Angus wrote: > > But a script should be able to take care of this, no? > Doesn't a script solve everything? Here is Arch's customized flyspray: http://projects.archlinux.org/vhosts/bugs.archlinux.org.git >> instead we chose to have some style but not everyone use it. >> >> [packagename] short de

Re: [arch-general] flyspray mailing list

Sergej Pupykin wrote: > Hello, > > what about creating mailing list with all flyspray notifications? > > I think it can take off some load from bug wrangler person and may be > usefull for Arch users. > Maybe something like this would help assign bug reports quicker? FWIW i am in favour of such

Re: [arch-general] Removing network utilities from base group?

Daniel Isenmann wrote: > Hi, > > I have a feature request (https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/22481) since > January which stated that rp-pppoe should be removed from the base > group. Described in the details he stated that every network package > should be removed from the base group and should o

Re: [arch-general] deprecate grub (legacy) - opinion?

Heiko Baums wrote: > > Not a good idea. Syslinux doesn't work on multiboot systems and grub2 > is not marked as stable as far as I know. > No version of GRUB legacy has ever been marked as stable either. Its been marked as alpha software from its inception, until its deprecation in favour of GRUB2

[arch-general] base stuff (was: Change Arch's default crond)

Thomas S Hatch wrote: > > I am saving the "include SELINUX support in base for a latter date" > > my understanding though is that the stated position of Arch was "no > systemd" s/was/is/g That is also my understanding in regards to selinux. Although i am not familiar with "stated positions" about

Re: [arch-general] base stuff (was: Change Arch's default crond)

Thomas S Hatch wrote: > On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: > >> Thomas S Hatch wrote: >> > >> > I am saving the "include SELINUX support in base for a latter date" >> > >> > my understanding though is that the stat

Re: [arch-general] base stuff

Yaro Kasear wrote: > On Wednesday, April 06, 2011 18:13:04 Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: >> Thomas S Hatch wrote: >> > >> > Yes the systemd topic keeps popping up, right now we don't know >> > if certain upstream changes are going to force Arch into using sy

Re: [arch-general] base stuff

Thomas S Hatch wrote: > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: > >> I guess you mean http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.arch.general/32759 > > Thanks for the link, I did not want to bring up SELinux yet, because I will > not be getting to it for a few

Re: [arch-general] Change Arch's default crond

Kaiting Chen wrote: > > The thing is that cronie is forked from vixie-cron which is much older than > fcron. And I would venture to say that vixie-cron or some derivative is the > default crond for the vast majority of distributions out there. --Kaiting. > Why do you have --disable-anacron in the

Re: [arch-general] base stuff

Nicky726 wrote: > > If I may add more to this SELinux related thread, I would like to aply for TU > and bring SELinux packages to community in the summer, to make using SELinux > easier. > I dont think thats gonna work since you'll have to provide the same packages as in [core] built differently

Re: [arch-general] base stuff

Allan McRae wrote: > On 09/04/11 00:24, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: >> Nicky726 wrote: >>> >>> If I may add more to this SELinux related thread, I would like to aply for >>> TU >>> and bring SELinux packages to community in the summer, to make using SEL

[arch-general] Cross-repository dependencies (was: libre office java support)

Heiko Baums wrote: > > And, btw., libreoffice can't depend on jre directly, because libreoffice > is in [extra] and jre is in [community]. > I thought the same too until i saw packages like gnucash which depend on aqbanking which is in community: http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/aq

[arch-general] What are people's opinions about this?

This feature request: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/23747 Greg

Re: [arch-general] What are people's opinions about this?

Yaro Kasear wrote: > On Wednesday, April 13, 2011 20:45:32 Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: >> This feature request: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/23747 >> >> >> Greg > > Is this some sort of configuration utility for Xorg? A little background > would > be

Re: [arch-general] What are people's opinions about this?

Heiko Baums wrote: > >> > On Wednesday, April 13, 2011 20:45:32 Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: >> >> This feature request: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/23747 >> >> >> >> Greg > > From what I read about it now, definitely not! > > I regul

Re: [arch-general] What are people's opinions about this?

Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: > Heiko Baums wrote: >> >>> > On Wednesday, April 13, 2011 20:45:32 Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: >>> >> This feature request: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/23747 >>> >> >>> >> Greg >> >> From w

Re: [arch-general] What are people's opinions about this?

Heiko Baums wrote: > > Sorry, but I still don't know why I should need autocutsel. The old, X > standard way just works. I never had any problems and I never felt the > need for something different. > > And I really don't want to read tons of documentations about a tool I > don't need. And because

Re: [arch-general] What are people's opinions about this?

Vitor Eiji Justus Sakaguti wrote: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 5:53 AM, Heiko Baums wrote: >> Am Thu, 14 Apr 2011 11:32:02 +0300 >> schrieb Grigorios Bouzakis : >>> this affects only the people using the autocutsel package from >>> [community]. >>> >>

Re: [arch-general] Change Arch's default crond

Kaiting Chen wrote: > > So what's the status here? I pulled cronie into [community-testing] a couple > of days ago and will probably merge it into [community] soon. So that's the > one I vote. > > But regardless of which one we choose in my opinion the sooner we get rid of > dcron the better. --Kai

Re: [arch-general] Change Arch's default crond

Yaro Kasear wrote: > > I'm still trying to understand WHY we suddenly feel the need to replace dcron > when its not even broken. Replacing packages with other packages purely > because they're new is something Fedora and Ubuntu would do, I though Arch > wasn't about arbitrarily replacing its def

Re: [arch-general] Change Arch's default crond

Ionut Biru wrote: > On 04/21/2011 02:18 PM, Heiko Baums wrote: >> Am Thu, 21 Apr 2011 08:48:04 +0200 >> schrieb Sven-Hendrik Haase: >> >>> I second this suggestion. cronie upstream isn't dead at all. cronie >>> is a drop-in unlike fcron which was favored earlier. >> >> Is it such a drop-in like the

Re: [arch-general] Change Arch's default crond

Ionut Biru wrote: > On 04/22/2011 12:11 AM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: >> Ionut Biru wrote: >>> On 04/21/2011 02:18 PM, Heiko Baums wrote: >>>> Am Thu, 21 Apr 2011 08:48:04 +0200 >>>> schrieb Sven-Hendrik Haase: >>>> >>>>> I secon

Re: [arch-general] Change Arch's default crond

Kaiting Chen wrote: > On Apr 21, 2011, at 17:30, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: > >> Ionut Biru wrote: >>> On 04/22/2011 12:11 AM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: >>>> Ionut Biru wrote: >>>>> On 04/21/2011 02:18 PM, Heiko Baums wrote: >>>>>&

Re: [arch-general] Change Arch's default crond

Evangelos Foutras wrote: > On 22/04/11 00:30, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: >> Ionut Biru wrote: >>> if this will happen, the steps are very simple >>> 1) remove dcron from core >>> 2) add cronie/fcron to core in base group and depending on the package, >&

Re: [arch-general] Myths and reality about cronie

Kaiting Chen wrote: > > [...] > Second cronie will in no way `replaces=('dcron')` but will most likely > `conflicts=('dcron')`. Therefore while it will be impossible to install both > on the same system having cronie in [core] will in no way force existing > users to switch. > > [...] > Next it is

Re: [arch-general] pacman: -Rd remove with no dependency check changed?

Marek Otahal wrote: > Oh, thank you very much Jesse! I already started writing a patch to mention > the -dd then I read the text carefully.. Don't bother, its already changed in git. Greg

Re: [arch-general] pacman: -Rd remove with no dependency check changed?

Marek Otahal wrote: > On Sunday 01 of May 2011 00:36:40 Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: >> Marek Otahal wrote: >> > Oh, thank you very much Jesse! I already started writing a patch to >> > mention the -dd then I read the text carefully.. > >> Don't bother, i

Re: [arch-general] Status of dcron

Jim Pryor wrote: > v4.5 was released as a tarball at ; > but Paul won't be able to package it right away. > Pierre already built a 4.5 package, which is current in testing http://www.archlinux.org/packages/testing/i686/dcron Greg

Re: [arch-general] What broke?!?!?!?

David Rosenstrauch wrote: > > * Connecting to an openvpn no longer works under > networkmanager/networkmanager-openvpn/nm-applet. Maybe this: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/24006

Re: [arch-general] New file "/etc/rc?"

Yaro Kasear wrote: > I'm a tad confused about the purpose of /etc/rc. It says its used for the > control of daemons and starting and stopping them. Does this mean its > replacing the daemons array or something? And with the starting and stopping > of daemons... is this for automation or somethin

Re: [arch-general] Pruning the bugtracker

JM wrote: > I have browsed through all High and Medium severity bugreports and > categorized some of them here: > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/User:Fijam . > > 'Candidates for closing' are divided into two categories: strong and > weak. Strong candidates have not been replied to in over 4

Re: [arch-general] pacman "Targets" sort order

David C. Rankin wrote: > Guys, > >I don't know if I am remembering correctly, but I thought the upgrade > "Targets" were sorted alphabetically by name prior to the pacman upgrade a > month or two ago. Now, it looks like they are listed either by repository, > then alphabetized or some other

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] cronie-1.4.7-7

Gaetan Bisson wrote: > > A new version of cronie is in [testing]. The only difference with the > previous one is that it does not have replaces=('dcron') and has > conflicts=('cron'). > > So users who wish to keep using dcron have nothing to do, but cronie > will be the default cron daemon on new i

Re: [arch-general] Hello

Thomas S Hatch wrote: > On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Brandon Jones wrote: > >> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Thomas S Hatch wrote: >> >> > Awesome! Also, bottom post, some people around here will get annoyed :) >> > >> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style >> > http://www.caliburn.nl/t

Re: [arch-general] File conflict between pyqt & python2-qt

Dominik Cermak wrote: > > there seems to be a file conflict between the two packages pyqt and > python2-qt > > python2-qt is flagged out of date, so will this be solved once the > package is updated or is this a bug? Its a bug and has already been reported, probably numerous times. Greg Sent via

[arch-general] Drop non-free ?! (Was: Commit in ffmpeg/trunk)

Ionut Biru wrote: > > drop nonfree stuff, fix headers > > Modified: PKGBUILD >=== > --- PKGBUILD 2011-05-07 11:29:11 UTC (rev 122937) > +++ PKGBUILD 2011-05-07 11:51:04 UTC (rev 122938) > @@ -5,26 +5,28 @@ > > -depends=('bzip2' 'la

Re: [arch-general] Drop non-free ?! (Was: Commit in ffmpeg/trunk)

Loui Chang wrote: > On Sat 07 May 2011 18:32 +0300, Ionut Biru wrote: >> On 05/07/2011 06:28 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: >> >Ionut Biru wrote: >> > >> >Is faac support in ffmpeg causing trouble to other applications or was >> >changed for licensing r

[arch-general] Display Manager rc.d scripts

Hello, can anyone think of a reason the rc.d scripts are added to kdm, gdm and slim? They are not recommended by anyone & they are to be blame for occasional weird problems. The standard and IMO only way is to start them from inittab. They dont come from upstream & i dont know when they were added,

Re: [arch-general] Display Manager rc.d scripts

Tom Gundersen wrote: > > The specific bug you pointed out is not particular to KDM/GDM/slim, > but should be fixed for all daemons (proper inheritance of LOCALE), > and it is on our TODO list. Indeed, but i didnt point to this report to prove that the rc.d way doesnt work. Its a 10 month old bug r

Re: [arch-general] Display Manager rc.d scripts

Heiko Baums wrote: > > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Start_X_at_boot Thats the worst wiki page i've ever seen, on any wiki. -- () against html e-mail | usenet & email communication netiquette /\ www.asciiribbon.org | www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html

Re: [arch-general] Display Manager rc.d scripts

cantabile wrote: > On 05/08/2011 08:19 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: >> Hello, >> can anyone think of a reason the rc.d scripts are added to kdm, gdm and >> slim? They are not recommended by anyone& they are to be blame for >> occasional weird problems. The standa

Re: [arch-general] Display Manager rc.d scripts

Rémy Oudompheng wrote: > On 2011/5/8 Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: >> Hello, >> can anyone think of a reason the rc.d scripts are added to kdm, gdm and >> slim? They are not recommended by anyone & they are to be blame for >> occasional weird problems. The standa

Re: [arch-general] rc.d bash completion

Auguste Pop wrote: > i wrote a very simple rc.d bash completion script. is there any chance > it can be used upstream? I noticed earlier theres one for zsh in the AUR as well. I was about to suggest to the author to send it upstream but negelcted to. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49136

Re: [arch-general] What happened to mousepad and xfprint?

Heiko Baums wrote: > I just wanted to do a system update and saw that mousepad, Xfce's text > editor, and xfprint, Xfce's print dialog and printer manager, have been > removed from [extra] and aren't moved to any other repo or AUR. Both > tools belong to Xfce which is in [extra]. > > What happened

Re: [arch-general] News draft for dropping tcp_wrappers

Dan McGee wrote: > Dropping tcp_wrappers support > > Due to upstream not having released a new version since April 1997, we > are dropping `tcp_wrappers` support from all packages and removing the > package from `[core]`. In addition, newer daemons and applications are > inconsistent in their suppo

Re: [arch-general] News draft for dropping tcp_wrappers

Florian Pritz wrote: > On 16.07.2011 21:09, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: >> Dan McGee wrote: >>> Dropping tcp_wrappers support >>> >>> Due to upstream not having released a new version since April 1997, we= > >>> are dropping `tcp_wrappers` support f

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] dash 0.5.7-1

Pierre Schmitz wrote: > On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 10:29:15 -0500, Dan McGee wrote: >> Upstream new release. >> >> -Dan > > Imho the base group could be removed as it is not needed by anything. > Its been requested : https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/22483 PS. For the filesystem package but relevant: htt

Re: [arch-general] Removing ssmtp and nbsmtp

On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 04:09:03PM -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote: > Just a quick question for all of you guys. Does anyone use ssmtp or > nbsmtp? They are both in extra, along with msmtp, and it seems like > quite a lot of duplication. So based on developer usage, we're most > likely going to boot ssm

Re: [arch-general] Mailing list rename

On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 04:15:28PM +0200, Roman Kyrylych wrote: > 2007/11/29, Jeff Mickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Nov 28, 2007 4:37 AM, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The prefix in the subject is fine, but can we please drop the footer? > > > It's annoying and breaks GPG/MIME.

Re: [arch-general] Mailing list rename

I would prefer keeping at least one line Greg pgpNWPcnNUrUf.pgp Description: PGP signature

[arch-general] Packages with non free licenses

Is Archlinux reconsidering license issues with the binary packages residing at its repos? It certainly seems so... http://archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2007-December/003780.html http://archlinux.org/news/374/ I really think this is a change for the better. I have been meaning to ask, A

Re: [arch-general] Packages with non free licenses

On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 10:37:13AM -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote: > On Dec 18, 2007 2:33 AM, Grigorios Bouzakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have been meaning to ask, AFAIK besides the codecs package the same > > license have ttf-ms-fonts. Is there any change to see them i

Re: [arch-general] Packages with non free licenses

On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 02:41:56PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Nonetheless, IF there is no clearly defined license especially when no > license document is extent on stuff that is meant to be used freely (as > long as it is not for commercial distribution), then why shouldn't arch > allow fo

Re: [arch-general] Packages with non free licenses

> BTW, *IF* arch is putting this on the 'core' cd , then yeah, we should > remove it, but the last time I did a full up archinstall, it was NOT on > the cd, so I am willing to bet that we can remove it easily enough too if > it has been added into the install cd. Archlinux currently offers two ins

Re: [arch-general] Packages with non free licenses

On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 08:52:51PM -0500, Jeff Mickey wrote: > On Dec 19, 2007 2:32 AM, Grigorios Bouzakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [...] > > Just to be honest here, it says you can't supply them in any form that > adds value to *commercial* products. We are n

[arch-general] xkeyboard-config 1.1-1

Since todays update of xkeyboard-config 1.1-1 i have been getting some errors like the following: expected keysym, got XF86KbdLightOnOff: line 70 of pc expected keysym, got XF86KbdBrightnessDown: line 71 of pc expected keysym, got XF86KbdBrightnessUp: line 72 of pc As a result leds arent working

Re: [arch-general] Weird makepkg problem

On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 11:17:16AM -0500, David Rosenstrauch wrote: > Hi. I'm the maintainer for the todotxt package in the AUR > (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?do_Details=1&ID=7673). While I was > trying to update the PKGBUILD today, something really peculiar happened. > > The todotxt

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Updating 'man'

On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 11:19:19AM -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote: > > LESSCHARSET > > But that only affects less, and not man pages. It's a fine line, but I > know at least a few people that don't use less as their MANPAGER Those people should. If color is the reason for using most, see http://nion

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Updating 'man'

On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 07:00:31PM +0100, Philippe Miron wrote: > I tought that: > Less is more than more and most is more than less! > > What are the main advantages of using less? > For a "normal" user close to none other than installing an additional package, since less is the default pager f

[arch-general] man pages and utf8

Regarding the discussion going on in arch-dev-public about changes in man and utf8 compliance. As far as i remember Roman's feature request [1] wasnt even mentioned. At least not recently. Are there any thoughts of replacing man with man-db? Or the recent chamges in man and groff make this FR inv

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] man-pages 2.77-1

On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 03:59:19PM +0100, Andreas Radke wrote: > for arches in testing. please signoff. it uses the new location in > /usr/share/man. > > -Andy > is this bug report valid? http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9440

Re: [arch-general] mozilla /usr move

On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 03:36:55PM -0500, Travis Willard wrote: > On Feb 6, 2008 5:32 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 03:14:25PM -0500, Travis Willard wrote: > > > On Feb 6, 2008 5:10 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis <[EMAIL

Re: [arch-general] mozilla /usr move

On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 03:14:25PM -0500, Travis Willard wrote: > On Feb 6, 2008 5:10 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 08:26:09PM +0100, Jan de Groot wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I've cleaned up t

[arch-general] mozilla /usr move

On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 08:26:09PM +0100, Jan de Groot wrote: > Hi all, > > I've cleaned up testing a bit: > - moved xulrunner/seamonkey/firefox and friends to extra. This is part > of the /usr move Any idea why an /opt/mozilla/lib directory is still created by one of those packages? It doesnt se

[arch-general] packages in base

Hi, i started playing with packages in base today, and the first two packages that come up in alphabetical order are acl and attr. I decided to research what those packages actually do, since i doubt i have ever used them. The site both packages link to is http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/. I am

Re: [arch-general] whither man page for xorg.conf?

On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 7:17 PM, David Rosenstrauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David Rosenstrauch wrote: > > Michael Schaefer wrote: > >>> Anyone know where the man page for xorg.conf is located? For some > >>> reason, when I try "man xorg.conf" I get "No manual entry for > >>> xorg.conf". > >>

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] ISO 2008.03 release status update

On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 08:10:22PM +0100, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > Hey guys keep cool, > following packages i would like to see in core: > > pending signoffs and move to base: > pmciautils, just a small udev.rules fix waiting for signoff. > cryptsetup -->waiting on response > > klibc > klibc-ex

Re: [arch-general] signoff kernel26-2.6.24.3-6

On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 01:09:08PM +0200, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:16:51AM +0100, Jan de Groot wrote: > > > -Oorspronkelijk bericht- > > > Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:arch-general- > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Roman Kyryly

Re: [arch-general] signoff kernel26-2.6.24.3-6

On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:16:51AM +0100, Jan de Groot wrote: > > -Oorspronkelijk bericht- > > Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:arch-general- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Roman Kyrylych > > Verzonden: dinsdag 25 maart 2008 9:48 > > Aan: General Discusson about Arch Linux > > Onderwerp: Re: [a

[arch-general] firefox & gcc 4.3

Hi, i have been trying to build firefox3b4 or firefox 2.0.0.12 for the past day without success. I guess it has something to do with the latest gcc upgrade to 4.3. Has anyone managed to build it, from AUR or not, within the last couple of days? ps. i am using the testing repo Greg

Re: [arch-general] firefox & gcc 4.3

On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 11:51:58AM -0700, JaDa wrote: > On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 11:39:55 -0700, Grigorios Bouzakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> Hi, i have been trying to build firefox3b4 or firefox 2.0.0.12 for the >> past day without success. I guess it has some

Re: [arch-general] signoff kernel26-2.6.24.3-6

On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 08:07:04PM +0100, Arvid Ephraim Picciani wrote: > On Monday 24 March 2008 22:47:34 RedShift wrote: > > I wanted to steer clear of personal attacks but unfortunately, tpowa has > > been a large contributer to the "lets adapt to the community"-style. I'm > > sorry to say it, b

Re: [arch-general] firefox & gcc 4.3

On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 01:57:49AM +0700, Emmanuel Benisty wrote: > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 08:39:55PM +0200, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: > > Hi, i have been trying to build firefox3b4 or firefox 2.0.0.12 for the > > past day without success. I guess it has something to do with the

Re: [arch-general] firefox & gcc 4.3

On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 03:19:25AM +0700, Emmanuel Benisty wrote: > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 03:58:06PM -0400, Eric Belanger wrote: > > On Tue, 25 Mar 2008, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 01:57:49AM +0700, Emmanuel Benisty wrote: > >>>

Re: [arch-general] firefox & gcc 4.3

On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 09:11:43PM +0100, Xavier wrote: > Grigorios Bouzakis a écrit : >> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 01:57:49AM +0700, Emmanuel Benisty wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 08:39:55PM +0200, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: >>>> Hi, i have been trying to build

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] ArchISO FTP Installer - Testers Needed

On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 03:53:52AM -0500, Simo Leone wrote: > Hey everyone, > > I'd like to begin testing some preliminary work with the arch livecd > system. You can find a livecd rigged up to work as an ftp installer at: > http://dev.archlinux.org/~simo/archiso_tests/arch-ftp-live-1206519468.iso

Re: [arch-general] firefox & gcc 4.3

On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 03:26:40PM +0200, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 09:11:43PM +0100, Xavier wrote: > > Grigorios Bouzakis a écrit : > >> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 01:57:49AM +0700, Emmanuel Benisty wrote: > >>> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 08:39:

Re: [arch-general] Installation: after first reboot ext3 superblock mount time in future

On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 02:12:35PM +0100, Gerhard Brauer wrote: > Hello, > > i've noticed this meanwhile quiet often after many installations. > Currently after a test with 2008.03-0.3, but also with older ISOs: > > After install and first reboot i got such fsck notice during rc: > > , > | /

Re: [arch-general] Installation: after first reboot ext3 superblock mount time in future

On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 12:22:37AM +0200, Roman Kyrylych wrote: > 2008/3/30, Roman Kyrylych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > 2008/3/29, Grigorios Bouzakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 02:12:35PM +0100, Gerhard Brauer wrote: > > > &

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] licenses: GPL permutations

On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 04:32:54PM +0100, Raeven Bathory wrote: > > [1]http://gplv3.fsf.org/wiki/index.php/Compatible_licenses#GPLv3-incompatible_licenses > >On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Loui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 17:58:20 +0300 > "Roman Kyrylych

Re: [arch-general] How to create archlinux install CD?

On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 06:46:51AM -0400, pyther wrote: > > All the packages are compiled for the i686 arch, so you would have to > > recompile every single package you would want to use. IIRC there use to be > > a port out there for i586 but I have no idea if it still exists. She has already d

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] initscripts changes

On 4/8/08, Michal Soltys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thomas Bächler wrote: > > > > > The point is, everyone needs it mounted. Your system will be completely > > useless without devpts (as it is without the lo interface). > > > > However, I know your opinion on these issues. Are there any rationa

Re: [arch-general] Banshee needs an update

On 4/18/08, JJDaNiMoTh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 08:00:26 +0200 > Xavier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Justin Gx wrote: > > > Alec Hussey wrote: > > >> Hello, > > >> > > >> I was glad when you guys (or Jan de Groot, whichever) decided to push > > >> the banshee alpha out

Re: [arch-general] Banshee needs an update

On 4/18/08, Xavier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 9:19 AM, Grigorios Bouzakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Current banshee version is 0.98.1 and latest is 0.98.3. Even though i > dont > > know i doubt the features added are that es

[arch-general] Mcpp in extra has no maintainer

As subject. It is also out of date.I assume its kth5's package since it is a dependency to xorg-server-utils. Greg

[arch-general] Arch64 specific mailing list?

Hi, i am getting my new shinny Quad Core desktop machine tomorrow and i am thinking of running x86_64 on that machine. I never really did bother getting familiar with that part of Archlinux until now since i didnt have a reason to. Browsing the wiki and forum today made me realise that there is no

Re: [arch-general] Arch64 specific mailing list?

On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 04:02:51PM -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote: > On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 4:09 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > i am getting my new shinny Quad Core desktop machine tomorrow and i am > > thinking of running x86_64 on that m

Re: [arch-general] Any place where changes in testing are announced?

On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 03:07:02PM +0200, Peter Galiovsky wrote: > Hello, > > after doing a system upgrade after some months, I found out the hard way > that the HAL support was removed from xorg-server. I wasted a full hour > trying to get my keyboard layouts back before realizing my recreated p

Re: [arch-general] Closing bugreports too fast?

On 4/30/08, Gerhard Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > i thought about a "trap" in which myself are also fallen sometimes: > I look at the bugtracker to see if someone filed already a bugreport for > a problem. But i don't find it cause it is already fixed and thereby > marked as closed

Re: [arch-general] Upstream bugs, patches

On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 10:43:29PM +0200, Nagy Gabor wrote: > Hi! > > I'm new to this list, and my English is far from perfect, please > tolerate it ;-) > > I am/was a big fan of ArchLinux, I'm using it from 0.5 version, I also > made some little contributions to pacman, but now I noticed some >

Re: [arch-general] Upstream bugs, patches

On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 02:11:48PM +0200, Nagy Gabor wrote: > > > And I don't hear much complaints about the distro-patching from > > > developers (exceptions: Jörg Schilling for example). A bit going > > > further, I think that "patchability" is one of the main power of > > > open source; and I se

Re: [arch-general] Bugs.

On 5/3/08, Loui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey there. I was just browsing the bug tracker and I noticed some open > bug reports: > > 7 reported in 0.7 Wombat > 10 reported in 0.7.1 Noodle > 58 reported in 0.7.2 Gimmick > 18 reported in 0.8 Voodoo > I'd love to help but obviously patches can

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] policy on desktop files?

Hi, i wanted to note that there is http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Desktop_Project maintained by bardo a TU, which mentions absolutely nothing about upstream. Instead it says "I (bardo) will write/modify the necessary files and notify the corresponding maintainers so they can be added to the pa

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] policy on desktop files?

On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 03:53:29PM +0300, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote: > On Thursday 08 May 2008 15:58:51 bardo wrote: > > On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > Hi, i wanted to note that there is > > &

  1   2   3   >