On 4/8/08, Michal Soltys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thomas Bächler wrote: > > > > > The point is, everyone needs it mounted. Your system will be completely > > useless without devpts (as it is without the lo interface). > > > > However, I know your opinion on these issues. Are there any rational > > reasons not to hardcode devpts? > > > > > I'm 100% with Thomas for it (along with /dev/shm). I've always wondered > why Arch keeps those two in fstab (there're few other things that could be > changed, but that's for a different post). > > If a user wants to change it, then the rc.sysinit is the place to do so > (whatever weired reason one would have for changing those mounts). If one > needs it for chroot environment for some program, then just mount --bind > manually - be it custom rc.d/something or anything else. > > I'd also be for adding all rc* files to backup array - although as long > as there's noupgrade in pacman, I'm not gonna weep ;) > > Well, my 2 cents here.
What 2 cents? Without the reasons you back up brain0 your mail is totally pointless IMO. Just like most of the other ones. This is not a poll. Greg