On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 04:09:03PM -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote: > Just a quick question for all of you guys. Does anyone use ssmtp or > nbsmtp? They are both in extra, along with msmtp, and it seems like > quite a lot of duplication. So based on developer usage, we're most > likely going to boot ssmtp and nbsmtp. > > Does anyone have a problem with that? They *will* be moved to the AUR > and can be move to community if any TU wants them. > > Opinions?
AFAIK those tools are used only by users of text based mail clients like mutt, pine etc. Mutt already has smtp functionability built-in in latest versions so for people using mutt, they should start using it if they already havent. IMO msmtp is the best of the *smtp's. Glad its staying in extra. BTW theres also esmtp in [community] already. Greg
pgpDzXVU2hDpg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ arch-general mailing list arch-general@archlinux.org http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-general
