On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 8:40 PM, sergio lenzi wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 10:11 PM, C Anthony Risinger
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Vic Demuzere wrote:
> > > On Jul 7, 2011 10:26 PM, "Ionut Biru" wrote:
> > >> everything you said above is plain wrong. EVERYTHING go read th
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 10:11 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Vic Demuzere wrote:
> > On Jul 7, 2011 10:26 PM, "Ionut Biru" wrote:
> >> everything you said above is plain wrong. EVERYTHING go read the wiki or
> > use gnome manuals
> >>
> >> 1) you can set up nauti
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Vic Demuzere wrote:
> On Jul 7, 2011 10:26 PM, "Ionut Biru" wrote:
>> everything you said above is plain wrong. EVERYTHING go read the wiki or
> use gnome manuals
>>
>> 1) you can set up nautilus to manage your desktop (use gnome-tweak-tool if
> you are not skilled
On Jul 7, 2011 10:26 PM, "Ionut Biru" wrote:
> everything you said above is plain wrong. EVERYTHING go read the wiki or
use gnome manuals
>
> 1) you can set up nautilus to manage your desktop (use gnome-tweak-tool if
you are not skilled enough)
> 2) alt+right click doh, is specified all over the i
Hello,
I am currently working on another toy example use of pyalpm: beside
pycman, the command line utility that comes with pyalpm, I have now
pacweb, a browsable Web interface to pacman.
http://projects.archlinux.org/users/remy/pacweb.git/
It is not suitable for public consumption, but offers
On 07/07/2011 11:17 PM, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote:
What's wrong with Gnome 3 in fallback mode? Have I missed something?
in fallback mode:
does not have icons in the desktop,
the panel is not the same, the mouse right click does not work
there are no applets.
Nautilus is a stand alone pr
>
> What's wrong with Gnome 3 in fallback mode? Have I missed something?
in fallback mode:
does not have icons in the desktop,
the panel is not the same, the mouse right click does not work
there are no applets.
Nautilus is a stand alone program and not use the desktop any more
There are sever
@Ionut, Lukas:
I support this proposal too and I'd agree that only the libOpenCL.so
(the ICD loader)
needs to be split off nvidia-utils. Otherwise it could just stay
intact as far as I can tell...
Also, it would probably be wise to settle for dependency names once for all,
by dependency names I
On 7 July 2011 18:34, Ionut Biru wrote:
> On 07/07/2011 05:46 PM, Nicolas Bigaouette wrote:
>
>
>
>
> OKKK
> after talking with Lukas i now have an idea about what you guys talking
> about.
>
> Right now, what can i do is to take care about nvidia's opencl
> implementation and loader.
>
> Wha
On 07/07/2011 05:46 PM, Nicolas Bigaouette wrote:
There might be just one right now, but OpenCL standard says many different
implementation should be able to install side by side, and the choice
between them is taken by the ICD loader.
OKKK
after talking with Lukas i now have an idea a
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 4:34 AM, Baho Utot wrote:
> On Thursday, July 07, 2011 02:36:10 AM Allan McRae wrote:
>> On 07/07/11 10:02, Baho Utot wrote:
>>>
>>> Still the best way is to build/repackage but the link works as weel.
>>
>> The worst you can do while symlinking libraries is entirely screw y
>
> Although that libclicd thingy looks outdated and/or incomplete,
> I like the testapps/list_platforms.c utility. It would be nice to have
> something
> like that in (a possible) wrapper ICD loader package (the
> /usr/lib/libOpenCL.so).
>
> AMD has a similar (more verbose) utility called 'clinfo'
2011/7/7 Nicolas Bigaouette :
> I've found somebody who tried to implement his own ICD loader:
> https://github.com/Max-E/libclicd
> It was not updated for many months, and may be missing a lot of feature.
>
> It might be easier to create a package that just provides
> /usr/lib/libOpenCL.so taken f
On 07.07.2011 16:55, David C. Rankin wrote:
> Guys,
>
>Since updating to libreoffice 3.4.1-2 I get a "General Error" on opening
> any document and on saving any document for the first time. (i.e. save a new
> document or 'save as' new name on existing documents)
>
>Libre seems to work.
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 09:55:59AM -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
> Guys,
>
> Since updating to libreoffice 3.4.1-2 I get a "General Error" on
> opening any document and on saving any document for the first time.
> (i.e. save a new document or 'save as' new name on existing
> documents)
>
> Li
Guys,
Since updating to libreoffice 3.4.1-2 I get a "General Error" on opening
any document and on saving any document for the first time. (i.e. save a new
document or 'save as' new name on existing documents)
Libre seems to work. After closing the error dialog, the document opens and
af
Thankyou Nicolas for the research, that's exactly what we need.
And yes Damjan, you are right.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/05/2011 12:53 AM, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote:
> for now, there is a complete gnome 2.32 working with gdm 2.18 (the
> old one) that have gdmsetup. libreoffice is version 3.3.3 and the
> pt-br package is libreoffice-pt-BR I have tested on severa
I've found somebody who tried to implement his own ICD loader:
https://github.com/Max-E/libclicd
It was not updated for many months, and may be missing a lot of feature.
It might be easier to create a package that just provides
/usr/lib/libOpenCL.so taken from one of the different implementation.
> There is no conflict.
>
>> Therefore, a sollution might be to simply pick one of available ICD
>> loaders (a thin one preferably) and make it a dependency for other
>> pkgs.
>
> We only have one in our repos so there's nothing to do as far as I can tell.
>
> In case I misunderstood something,
> I'm sending this to maintainers who maintain involved pkgs.
> People that might be also interested are in Cc, please let me know
> should you find this mail too spammy/annoying :)
Next time please send this to the appropriate mailing list (arch-general
or aur-general in most cases) and if you fe
Forwarding discussion to arch-general mailing list.
Original Message
Subject: The OpenCL ICD problem
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 15:48:52 +0200
From: Vojtěch Král
Hello,
I'm writing to you because of a problem which has arisen with the
OpenCL Arch packages.
To introduce myself sho
On Thursday, July 07, 2011 02:36:10 AM Allan McRae wrote:
> On 07/07/11 10:02, Baho Utot wrote:
> > On Wednesday, July 06, 2011 05:59:33 PM Paul Ezvan wrote:
> >>> As a temporary work around, just add a link in /usr/lib from
> >>> /usr/lib/libdb-5.1.so -> libdb-5.2.so:
> >>>
> >>> 13:14 providenc
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 7:02 PM, Baho Utot wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 06, 2011 05:59:33 PM Paul Ezvan wrote:
>> >
>> > sudo ln -sf /usr/lib/libdb-5.2.so /usr/lib/libdb-5.1.so
>>
>> Please don't do that, this is a bad workaround !
>
> Why?
... segfaults, leaks?, corruption, security ++ an unending
24 matches
Mail list logo
