On 04/16/2010 04:37 AM, Andre "Osku" Schmidt wrote:
> and as im a fresh arch user, if you have any tips on using pacman,
> please bash me :) (i just copied the commands from pacman rosetta)
>
The only thing I can think of that you might be missing through your
approach is chaining commands toge
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Isaac Dupree <
m...@isaac.cedarswampstudios.org> wrote:
> On 04/18/10 10:13, Arvid Picciani wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 16:22:28 -0700, Rob Bean wrote:
>>
>> Has anyone else stripped HAL completely out of their Arch install?
>>>
>>
>> Thats exactly why heres
It would appear that on Apr 18, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook did say:
> It would appear that on Apr 17, David C. Rankin did say:
>
> > On 04/16/2010 04:12 PM, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote:
> > >
> >
> > > How can I a regular "Joe user", figure out if this is an actual E17 bug
> > > or if it's an Arc
It would appear that on Apr 17, David C. Rankin did say:
> On 04/16/2010 04:12 PM, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote:
> >
>
> > How can I a regular "Joe user", figure out if this is an actual E17 bug
> > or if it's an Arch specific thing???
> >
>
> Joe,
>
> I'll have to check my E17 install
It would appear that on Apr 18, Gary Wright did say:
> On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 7:19 AM, Mauro Santos
> wrote:
> > Is it just me or is everyone getting something like this when posting to
> > [arch-general]:
> >
> > "Sorry. Your message could not be delivered to:
> >
> > Joey Kingery (Mailbox has
On 04/18/2010 06:26 PM, Gary Wright wrote:
> Pastebin of a NDN message for joey klingery:
>
> http://aur.pastebin.com/Wa8EKZgb
>
Yes, that's it. I use thunderbird to manage my email and it works fine
for every other emails, also this is something recent because I've sent
emails before to this li
On 04/17/2010 09:50 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 18/04/10 11:44, David C. Rankin wrote:
>>
>> I guess one way would just be to rebuild everything and see if it
>> fixes it, but
>> there has to be some debugging tool that can ID who calls what. What
>> say the
>> experts?
>>
>
> readelf -d $(pacman
On 04/18/10 10:13, Arvid Picciani wrote:
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 16:22:28 -0700, Rob Bean wrote:
Has anyone else stripped HAL completely out of their Arch install?
Thats exactly why heresy was started. ( http://hereticlinux.org/ )
Its archlinux minus hal/dbus/rapekit.
Search the list for "Whats
Pastebin of a NDN message for joey klingery:
http://aur.pastebin.com/Wa8EKZgb
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 12:17 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Add "sh" dep to ensure availability for install script, compress info pages.
>
> Signoff both,
> Allan
How about handling http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/18718 (remove ed and
bin86 from base-devel)?
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 7:19 AM, Mauro Santos
wrote:
> Is it just me or is everyone getting something like this when posting to
> [arch-general]:
>
> "Sorry. Your message could not be delivered to:
>
> Joey Kingery (Mailbox has been deleted. Try re-entering the address.)"
>
> It is not the first t
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 16:22:28 -0700, Rob Bean wrote:
> Has anyone else stripped HAL completely out of their Arch install?
Thats exactly why heresy was started. ( http://hereticlinux.org/ )
Its archlinux minus hal/dbus/rapekit.
Search the list for "Whats wrong with dbus anyway" under the thread
On Sunday 18 April 2010 12:05:00 Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Thomas Bächler wrote:
> > > Has anyone else stripped HAL completely out of their Arch
install?
> >
> > Would be too nice, but it looks like KDE 4.5 won't be HAL-free
yet and
> > we'll have to wait for 4.6 - so I will keep HAL around for
Is it just me or is everyone getting something like this when posting to
[arch-general]:
"Sorry. Your message could not be delivered to:
Joey Kingery (Mailbox has been deleted. Try re-entering the address.)"
It is not the first time I have received this and it does not seem to be
a temporary pro
On 04/18/2010 12:22 AM, Rob Bean wrote:
> I've recently started using Xorg 1.8 from the [xorg18] repo to finally be
> able to get rid of HAL. Xorg is working fine, but I want to remove the
> remaining packages that depend on HAL.
>
> It looks like there are only 3: gnome-vfs, gstreamer0.10-good-p
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Jan de Groot wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 23:41 -0400, Ray Kohler wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Jan de Groot wrote:
>> > Things todo before this merges to extra:
>> > - Fix xf86-video-siliconmotion, xf86-video-unichrome, xf86-video-nouveau
>>
>> I'm
Thomas Bächler wrote:
> > Has anyone else stripped HAL completely out of their Arch install?
>
> Would be too nice, but it looks like KDE 4.5 won't be HAL-free yet and
> we'll have to wait for 4.6 - so I will keep HAL around for at least half
> a year.
The important question is: by what will hal
On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 23:41 -0400, Ray Kohler wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Jan de Groot wrote:
> > Things todo before this merges to extra:
> > - Fix xf86-video-siliconmotion, xf86-video-unichrome, xf86-video-nouveau
>
> I'm curious as to what this means. In particular, what's broken
18 matches
Mail list logo
