Re: [arch-general] Netcfg after resume from suspend

2010-01-30 Thread James Rayner
On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 00:34 +0100, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote: > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 05:00:04PM +0100, Thomas Bächler wrote: > > > You should try the testing version of netcfg instead: > > http://mirrors.kernel.org/archlinux/testing/os/any/netcfg-2.5.0rc2-1-any.pkg.tar.gz > > Will this allow to

Re: [arch-general] Netcfg after resume from suspend

2010-01-30 Thread fons
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 05:00:04PM +0100, Thomas Bächler wrote: > You should try the testing version of netcfg instead: > http://mirrors.kernel.org/archlinux/testing/os/any/netcfg-2.5.0rc2-1-any.pkg.tar.gz Will this allow to specify additional routes (apart from GATEWAY) as well ? It's one thing

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel 2.6.32.7-1

2010-01-30 Thread Ignacio Galmarino
On 01/30/2010 02:50 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote: Hi guys, bump to latest bugfix version. Please signoff both arches, signoff x86_64

Re: [arch-general] kernel26-2.6.32.6-1 updates breaks Compiz?

2010-01-30 Thread Eric Bélanger
2010/1/30 Ng Oon-Ee : > On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 05:03 -0500, Eric Bélanger wrote: >> 2010/1/30 Ng Oon-Ee : >> > On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 13:19 +0200, Ionut Biru wrote: >> >> On 01/29/2010 10:33 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: >> >> > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Ng Oon-Ee  wrote: >> >> > >> >> > Update, I've

[arch-general] Vertical Quicklaunch on the Desktop in KDE4 - It's a Winner

2010-01-30 Thread David C. Rankin
Guys, The far right-hand sliver of the screen is rarely covered on my desktop. Using the quicklaunch widget turns it into a very useful launch area without placing an entire 'toolbar' on the edge by using the 'quicklaunch' widget. Using the quicklaunch, you can put ~20 of your favorite ap

Re: [arch-general] [PATCH] Drastically reduce loading time of Todo lists

2010-01-30 Thread Dan McGee
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Evangelos Foutras wrote: > Use Django's select_related() on the TodolistPkg QuerySet to avoid > making 4 database queries per package. This way we're making just one > query, regardless of the number of packages in the Todo list. > > Local testing with 1000 entrie

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit

2010-01-30 Thread Uli Armbruster
Just some words from my point of view: Like some of you guys - most of you I guess.. - I don't really like Jörg's way to articulate. He has his arguments, which are really good ones, but it always becomes a discussion like this. I saw this in the german Ubuntu forums, before I switched to Archl

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit

2010-01-30 Thread Damjan Georgievski
>> > There was a very simple suggestion some message ago, why not >> > dual-license the CDDL parts of cdrtools and be done with any and all >> > the FUD (from any side), all the anomisity, and trolling. >> >> Or the other way around: put mkisofs under CDDL, so the package has a >> homogeneous licen

Re: [arch-general] ca-cf keyboard layout in hal

2010-01-30 Thread Damjan Georgievski
>> I cannot find the "cf" variant in the ca layout (canadian french) in >> /usr/share/X11/xkb/rules/xorg.lst. What happened with it? > > The layouts are listed in evdev.lst, as that's what the evdev driver > uses. Looking through that file, the variant for canadian french is > fr-legacy or fr-dvora

Re: [arch-general] Why taking so long?

2010-01-30 Thread Andrea Fagiani
On 01/30/2010 01:37 PM, Heiko Baums wrote: Am Sat, 30 Jan 2010 13:11:26 +0100 schrieb Andrea Crotti: Sometimes (only twice actually) I had to recompile the kernel with ice support from aur. Now compiling the kernel is not a short job, but it looks like it really compiles EVERYTHING! Maybe

Re: [arch-general] Netcfg after resume from suspend

2010-01-30 Thread Jim Pryor
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 01:23:25PM +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > Thanks, it does seem to work (just one try so far). I've seen the netcfg > testing thread in the forums, is that the authoritative place to go for > info on this latest version, since the wiki doesn't seem updated for it > yet (which of c

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit - tone it down

2010-01-30 Thread fons
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 09:58:19AM -0500, Baho Utot wrote: > This is what I have done because of _your_ direct actions on this > list and other actions by you on some news groups I read. > ... Your post makes you look like a juvenile struggling with the first hormones. > I don't care if cdrtool

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit

2010-01-30 Thread virus_found
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 08:35:38AM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote: > Steve Holmes wrote: > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: RIPEMD160 > > > > I don't know much about the licenses differences and all that crap but > > I experienced a problem with cdrecord several years ago where it w

Re: [arch-general] ca-cf keyboard layout in hal

2010-01-30 Thread Sébastien Leblanc
Actually, I tried the variant "fr" even if it was not listed and it worked. How come that variant is not listed in the evdev.lst file? Should that problem be reported upstream? Strangely, in the kcontrol Keyboard layout selection menu, the variant "fr" for the canadian keyboard does appear. As fo

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit - tone it down

2010-01-30 Thread Baho Utot
Joerg Schilling wrote: Heiko Baums wrote: I mean I assume that you have a big technical knowledge. Otherwise you wouldn't be able to write such a program and build such an Open Solaris LiveCD. But I also can understand that some people feel being attacked by you. On the other hand I can und

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit - tone it down

2010-01-30 Thread Heiko Baums
Am Sat, 30 Jan 2010 14:56:13 +0100 schrieb joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (Joerg Schilling): > It seems that you also use this discussion to attack me. Where did I attack you? If you feel so easy being attacked, then you should indeed think about yourself. Greetings, Heiko

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit - tone it down

2010-01-30 Thread Allan McRae
On 30/01/10 23:56, Joerg Schilling wrote: It would help a lot of you first try to understand what happened. A person did make a claim about an alleged problem without giving any proof for his claims. I asked him kindly to give enough information so in case there really was a problem, I am able to

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit - tone it down

2010-01-30 Thread Ng Oon-Ee
On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 14:56 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote: > Heiko Baums wrote: > > > I mean I assume that you have a big technical knowledge. Otherwise you > > wouldn't be able to write such a program and build such an Open Solaris > > LiveCD. But I also can understand that some people feel being

Re: [arch-general] ca-cf keyboard layout in hal

2010-01-30 Thread Jan de Groot
On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 08:56 -0500, Sébastien Leblanc wrote: > I cannot find the "cf" variant in the ca layout (canadian french) in > /usr/share/X11/xkb/rules/xorg.lst. What happened with it? I am trying > to use a USB keyboard on my laptop, however it gets set as US instead > of ca-cf. I check the

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit - tone it down

2010-01-30 Thread Joerg Schilling
Heiko Baums wrote: > I mean I assume that you have a big technical knowledge. Otherwise you > wouldn't be able to write such a program and build such an Open Solaris > LiveCD. But I also can understand that some people feel being attacked > by you. On the other hand I can understand that you like

[arch-general] ca-cf keyboard layout in hal

2010-01-30 Thread Sébastien Leblanc
I cannot find the "cf" variant in the ca layout (canadian french) in /usr/share/X11/xkb/rules/xorg.lst. What happened with it? I am trying to use a USB keyboard on my laptop, however it gets set as US instead of ca-cf. I check the file 10-keymap.fdi in /etc/hal/fdi/policy, but when I put ca as layo

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit - tone it down

2010-01-30 Thread Joerg Schilling
Daenyth Blank wrote: > I have been reading this mailing list for several years, and can think > of maybe one or two discussions that got like this. The vast majority > of them are quite civil technical discussions. Don't blame the > language for your lack of competence. If you feel that English c

Re: [arch-general] Why taking so long?

2010-01-30 Thread Heiko Baums
Am Sat, 30 Jan 2010 13:11:26 +0100 schrieb Andrea Crotti : > Sometimes (only twice actually) I had to recompile the kernel with ice > support from aur. > Now compiling the kernel is not a short job, but it looks like it > really compiles EVERYTHING! > > Maybe putting my .config somewhere it will

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit - tone it down

2010-01-30 Thread Heiko Baums
Am Sat, 30 Jan 2010 12:48:33 +0100 schrieb joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (Joerg Schilling): > Let me give some basic explanations: > > In German we have the word "Streitkultur", there is no equlvalent in > English - guess why... And the word "Streitkultur" is the biggest misnomer ("Unwort"

Re: [arch-general] kernel26-2.6.32.6-1 updates breaks Compiz?

2010-01-30 Thread Ng Oon-Ee
On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 13:51 +0200, Ionut Biru wrote: > On 01/30/2010 01:03 PM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > > On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 05:03 -0500, Eric Bélanger wrote: > >> 2010/1/30 Ng Oon-Ee: > >>> On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 13:19 +0200, Ionut Biru wrote: > On 01/29/2010 10:33 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > > On

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit - tone it down

2010-01-30 Thread Daenyth Blank
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 06:48, Joerg Schilling wrote: > In Germany, it is possible to have a technically based discussion without > attacking the other people. If you try to have the same using the English > language, people often claim that they have been personally attacked and > personally atta

Re: [arch-general] Why taking so long?

2010-01-30 Thread Daenyth Blank
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 07:13, pyther wrote: > Likely everything is being compiled in the kernel. The idea behind this is > so you can take the binary and distribute it to anyone and have it work on > their systems (with different hardware). > > if you want to use your own config and select what y

Re: [arch-general] Why taking so long?

2010-01-30 Thread pyther
On 01/30/2010 07:11 AM, Andrea Crotti wrote: Sometimes (only twice actually) I had to recompile the kernel with ice support from aur. Now compiling the kernel is not a short job, but it looks like it really compiles EVERYTHING! Maybe putting my .config somewhere it will not do it, how do you man

[arch-general] Why taking so long?

2010-01-30 Thread Andrea Crotti
Sometimes (only twice actually) I had to recompile the kernel with ice support from aur. Now compiling the kernel is not a short job, but it looks like it really compiles EVERYTHING! Maybe putting my .config somewhere it will not do it, how do you manage it? Thanks

Re: [arch-general] kernel26-2.6.32.6-1 updates breaks Compiz?

2010-01-30 Thread Ionut Biru
On 01/30/2010 01:03 PM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 05:03 -0500, Eric Bélanger wrote: 2010/1/30 Ng Oon-Ee: On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 13:19 +0200, Ionut Biru wrote: On 01/29/2010 10:33 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: Update, I've found that dis

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit - tone it down

2010-01-30 Thread Joerg Schilling
Nathan Wayde wrote: > @Joerg Schilling > > This is not another attack against you so please to not try and make > yourself appear as some kinda of victim here as well. Let me give some basic explanations: In German we have the word "Streitkultur", there is no equlvalent in English - guess why

Re: [arch-general] kernel26-2.6.32.6-1 updates breaks Compiz?

2010-01-30 Thread Ng Oon-Ee
On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 05:03 -0500, Eric Bélanger wrote: > 2010/1/30 Ng Oon-Ee : > > On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 13:19 +0200, Ionut Biru wrote: > >> On 01/29/2010 10:33 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > >> > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > >> > > >> > Update, I've found that disabling the 'png'

Re: [arch-general] kernel26-2.6.32.6-1 updates breaks Compiz?

2010-01-30 Thread Eric Bélanger
2010/1/30 Ng Oon-Ee : > On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 13:19 +0200, Ionut Biru wrote: >> On 01/29/2010 10:33 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: >> > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Ng Oon-Ee  wrote: >> > >> > Update, I've found that disabling the 'png' plugin under the 'Image >> > Loading' section "fixes" the issue, at

Re: [arch-general] how to Map shortcut keys in KDE4.3 to lunch custom Applications?

2010-01-30 Thread Gaurish Sharma
Hi All, After reading your suggestions, I have managed to get the shortcuts working. Thanks! Regards, Gaurish Sharma www.gaurishsharma.com

Re: [arch-general] Little problems with arch

2010-01-30 Thread Andrea Crotti
Andrea Fagiani writes: > Hi Andrea, > 1) time issue ... Great, that solved everything :) Now it wouldn't be so bad to have the 3d working but I don't want to lose too much time. I had already opened a discussion on the forum http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=71102 If someone has a dell 1

[arch-general] [signoff] kernel 2.6.32.7-1

2010-01-30 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Hi guys, bump to latest bugfix version. Please signoff both arches, greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit - tone it down

2010-01-30 Thread Nathan Wayde
@Joerg Schilling This is not another attack against you so please to not try and make yourself appear as some kinda of victim here as well. I know it's none of my business replying here, but I feel I need to say something. It's not related to the original discussion, but your attitude. Now,

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit

2010-01-30 Thread Andres Perera
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 3:05 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote: > If you would give evidence, it would be easy to prove that your alleged > problem > is not related to cdrecord. You've made your point and I agree with you :) but please don't get yourself unsubscribed by being sarcastic... Andres