Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] Release 13.0.1-rc1 has been tagged

On 30 Nov 2021, at 07:07, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev wrote: > > I've tagged 13.0.1-rc1. Testers can begin testing and uploading binaries. For 13.0.1 rc1, I have built and tested on both FreeBSD 12 and 13. No additional patches were needed. For the 32-builds I used -no-flang, as flang is curren

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] 13.0.0-rc4 has been tagged

On 25 Sep 2021, at 07:53, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: > > I've tagged 13.0.0-rc4. Please test and upload binaries. If all goes well, > we > will release 13.0.0-final in ~1 week. For 13.0.0 rc4, I have built and tested on both FreeBSD 12 and 13. No additional patches were needed,

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] 13.0.0-rc3 has been tagged

On 14 Sep 2021, at 06:40, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: > > I've tagged 13.0.0-rc3. This will likely be the last rc unless there are > critical bugs that are found. Please test the release and report results. For 13.0.0 rc3, I have built and tested on both FreeBSD 12 and 13. No addi

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] 13.0.0-rc2 has been tagged

On 27 Aug 2021, at 07:20, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: > > I've tagged the 13.0.0-rc2 release. Testers can begin testing and uploading > binaries. > > 13.0.0-rc3 is scheduled to be released on Sep. 7, so we'll continue to accept > bug fixes in the branch until then. For 13.0.0 rc2,

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] 13.0.0-rc1 has been tagged

On 3 Aug 2021, at 09:20, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: > > I've tagged the 13.0.0-rc1 release. Testers, please test and upload binaries. For 13.0.0 rc1, I have built and tested on both FreeBSD 12 and 13. I used 6 patches, which are attached. (Most of these are already merged for the

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] 12.0.1-rc4 release has been tagged

On 2 Jul 2021, at 22:59, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: > > I've tagged the 12.0.1-rc4 release. This will hopefully be the last release > candidate. Please test and upload binaries. For 12.0.1 rc4, I have built and tested on both FreeBSD 11 and 12. No additional patches were needed.

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] 12.0.1-rc3 has been tagged

On 26 Jun 2021, at 07:49, Tom Stellard via cfe-dev wrote: > > I've tagged the 12.0.1-rc3 release. Testers please test and upload binaries. For 12.0.1 rc3, I have built and tested on both FreeBSD 11 and 12. No additional patches were needed. Main results on amd64-freebsd11: Unsupported

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] Release 12.0.1-rc2 tagged + extended deadline for requesting backports

On 17 Jun 2021, at 08:53, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: > > I've tagged the 12.0.1-rc2 release, so testers may begin testing and uploading > binaries. For 12.0.1 rc2, I have built and tested on both FreeBSD 11 and 12. No additional patches were needed. Main results on amd64-freebsd1

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] 12.0.1-rc1 release has been tagged

On 26 May 2021, at 09:15, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: > > I've tagged the 12.0.1-rc1 release. Testers may upload binaries and report > results. For 12.0.1 rc1, I have built and tested on both FreeBSD 11 and 12. No additional patches were needed. Main results on amd64-freebsd11:

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 12.0.0-rc5 has been tagged

On 8 Apr 2021, at 03:44, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: > > I've tagged 12.0.0-rc5, testers can begin testing and upload binaries. For 12.0.0 rc5, I have built and tested on both FreeBSD 11 and 12. No additional patches were needed. Main results on amd64-freebsd11: Unsupported

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 12.0.0-rc3 has been tagged

On 10 Mar 2021, at 16:10, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: > > I've tagged LLVM 12.0.0-rc3. Testers may begin testing and uploading > binaries. > If all goes well, this will be the last RC. For 12.0.0 rc3, I have built and tested on both FreeBSD 11 and 12. No additional patches were ne

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 12.0.0-rc2 has been tagged

On 24 Feb 2021, at 05:45, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: > LLVM 12.0.0-rc2 has been tagged. Please test and report any issues in > bugzilla. For 12.0.0 rc2, I have built and tested on both FreeBSD 11 and 12. No additional patches were needed anymore (i.e. fixes for both issues I found

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 11.1.0-final has been tagged.

On 18 Feb 2021, at 05:06, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: > > I've tagged 11.1.0-final, testers may begin uploading binaries now. For 11.1.0 final, I have built and tested on both FreeBSD 11 and 12 again. No additional patches were needed. Main results on amd64-freebsd11: Unsupport

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] 12.0.0-rc1 Release has been tagged

On 19 Feb 2021, at 19:14, Tom Stellard wrote: > > On 2/13/21 1:44 PM, Louis Dionne wrote: >>> On Feb 13, 2021, at 12:04, Dimitry Andric wrote: >>> On 28 Jan 2021, at 05:05, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev >>> wrote: I've tagged the 12.0.0-rc1 release. Testers can begin testing and uploa

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] 12.0.0-rc1 Release has been tagged

On 28 Jan 2021, at 05:05, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev wrote: > > I've tagged the 12.0.0-rc1 release. Testers can begin testing and upload > binaries. For 12.0.0 rc1, I have built and tested on both FreeBSD 11 and 12. I used two patches, which are attached. Main results on amd64-freebsd11:

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] 12.0.0-rc1 Release has been tagged

On 28 Jan 2021, at 05:05, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev wrote: > > I've tagged the 12.0.0-rc1 release. Testers can begin testing and upload > binaries. During 12.0.0-rc1 test builds on FreeBSD, I encountered this unittest failure, which turned out to be caused by recent libc++ changes: FAILED

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 11.1.0-rc3 has been tagged

On 8 Feb 2021, at 18:14, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: > > I've tagged LLVM 11.1.0-rc3. If there are no issues, then I'll be tagging > the final release in 1 week. Testers please test and upload binaries. For 11.1.0 rc3, I have built and tested on both FreeBSD 11 and 12 again. No ad

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 11.1.0-rc1 has been tagged

On 14 Jan 2021, at 02:46, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: > > LLVM 11.1.0-rc1 has been tagged. This is a special release with a > libclang.so ABI fix to ensure libclang.so remains compatible with LLVM 10 and > LLVM 12. Testers may begin testing and upload binaries. For 11.1.0 rc1, I

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 11.0.1-final has been tagged

On 6 Jan 2021, at 04:21, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: > > I've tagged LLVM 11.0.1-final. Testers can upload the final binaries now. For 11.0.1 release, I have built and tested on both FreeBSD 11 and 12 this time. No additional patches were needed. Main results on amd64-freebsd11:

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 11.0.1-rc2 has been tagged

On 19 Dec 2020, at 07:33, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: > > I've just tagged LLVM 11.0.1-rc2, hopefully this will be the last release > candidate. Testers can begin testing and uploading binaries. For 11.0.1 rc2, I have built and tested on both FreeBSD 11 and 12 this time. No additi

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 11.0.1-rc1 has been tagged

On 26 Nov 2020, at 08:21, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: > > I've tagged LLVM 11.0.1-rc1. Testers may begin testing and uploading > binaries. If you still have bugs you want fixed in LLVM 11.0.1, you have > until Dec. 8 to request backports. You can make these requests by filing a

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [11.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 6 is here

On 7 Oct 2020, at 16:40, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers wrote: > > A few more issues appeared, so here is yet another release candidate: > llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6 was just tagged. I've built rc6, and again this did not need any patches. Main results on amd64-freebsd11: Unsupported: 5

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [11.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 5 is here

On 30 Sep 2020, at 20:07, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers wrote: > > We had to pick up another bug fix, so here is another release > candidate: llvmorg-11.0.0-rc5 tag was just created. I've built both rc4 and rc5, and again these did not need any patches. Main results on amd64-freebsd11:

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [11.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 3 is here

On 22 Sep 2020, at 17:12, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers wrote: > > After some delay, the llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3 tag was just created. This rc3, like rc2, I could finally build and test without adding any patches! :) Main results on amd64-freebsd11: Unsupported: 5122 (rc2: 5121)

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [11.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 2 is here

On 20 Aug 2020, at 22:34, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers wrote: > > The llvmorg-11.0.0-rc2 tag was just created. This rc2, I could finally build and test without adding any patches! :) Main results on amd64-freebsd11: Unsupported: 5121 (rc1: 5121) Passed : 69739 (

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [11.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 1 is here

On 28 Jul 2020, at 19:49, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers wrote: > > We're a little bit behind schedule, but RC1 is now here. It was tagged > earlier today as llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1. For this rc1, I used two patches, which are attached. (Yes, I am slowly, very slowly, working on getting these int

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 10.0.1-final has been tagged

On 21 Jul 2020, at 07:25, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: > > I've tagged 10.0.1-final. Testers, please begin uploading your binaries. For the final build, I used four patches, which are attached. (Yes, I am slowly, very slowly, working on getting these into the tree. :) Main results

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] 10.0.1-rc4 tagged

On 8 Jul 2020, at 06:08, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: > I've tagged 10.0.1-rc4, please test and report the results. For this rc, I used four patches, which are attached. Main results on amd64-freebsd11: Expected Passes: 67554 Passes With Retry : 1 Expected Failures : 265

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] 10.0.1-rc2 release has been tagged

On 27 Jun 2020, at 02:44, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: > > I've tagged the 10.0.1-rc2 release, please test the release and report any > issues. For this rc, I used four patches, which are attached. Main results on amd64-freebsd11: Expected Passes: 68020 Passes With Retry

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] 10.0.1-rc1 release has been tagged

On 20 May 2020, at 03:22, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: > > I have just tagged the 10.0.1-rc1 release. Testers can begin testing and > uploading > binaries. > > If you still want to get a fix into the 10.0.1 release, you still have about > a month > to get your fix in. To request

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] RFC: Switching from Bugzilla to Github Issues [UPDATED]

Since Bugzilla numbers are all under 50,000 (at least for now:), can't we simply bump the GitHub issue/pull request numbers to 50,000, and start from there? Then it would be easy to identify: < 5 means Bugzilla, >= 5 means GitHub. Now somebody's only gotta find a way to file 5-200

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 10.0.0 Release

On 24 Mar 2020, at 21:32, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers wrote: > > I am pleased to announce that LLVM 10 is now available. > > Get it here: https://llvm.org/releases/download.html#10.0.0 For 10.0.0-final, I used three patches, which are attached. Main results on amd64-freebsd11: Expect

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [10.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 5 is here

On 19 Mar 2020, at 14:51, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers wrote: > > I had hoped that rc4 would be the last one, but I wanted to pick up > one more fix, so here we go. > > Release Candidate 5 was just tagged as llvmorg-10.0.0-rc5 on the > release branch at 35627038123. For 10.0.0-rc5, I used

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [10.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 4 is here

On 15 Mar 2020, at 10:58, Dimitry Andric via Release-testers wrote: > > On 13 Mar 2020, at 20:09, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers > wrote: >> >> Release Candidate 4 was tagged earlier today as llvmorg-10.0.0-rc4 on >> the release branch at b406eab8880. It contains 12 commits since the >> pr

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [10.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 4 is here

On 13 Mar 2020, at 20:09, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers wrote: > > Release Candidate 4 was tagged earlier today as llvmorg-10.0.0-rc4 on > the release branch at b406eab8880. It contains 12 commits since the > previous release candidate. For 10.0.0-rc4, I used three patches, which are attach

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [10.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 2 is here

On 13 Feb 2020, at 23:34, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers wrote: > > Release Candidate 2 was tagged earlier today as llvmorg-10.0.0-rc2. It > includes 98 commits since the previous release candidate. For this rc, I used three patches, which are attached. Main results on amd64-freebsd11: E

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [cfe-dev] [10.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 1 is here

On 6 Feb 2020, at 11:16, Yvan Roux via Release-testers wrote: ... > And a bunch of errors in the testsuite: > > FAILED: > Bitcode/simd_ops/CMakeFiles/simd_ops_test_op_usubl_1306.dir/AArch64_halide_runtime.bc.o > /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg-llvm-release/tcwg-apm_64-build/rc1/test-suite-

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [10.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 1 is here

On 4 Feb 2020, at 12:06, Dimitry Andric via Release-testers wrote: > > On 30 Jan 2020, at 20:38, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers > wrote: >> >> It took a bit longer than planned due to master being a somewhat >> unstable at the branch point, but Release Candidate 1 has now been >> tagged as

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [10.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 1 is here

On 30 Jan 2020, at 20:38, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers wrote: > > It took a bit longer than planned due to master being a somewhat > unstable at the branch point, but Release Candidate 1 has now been > tagged as llvmorg-10.0.0-rc1. I tried building rc1 for 32-bit FreeBSD, but ran into a co

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [10.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 1 is here

On 3 Feb 2020, at 10:57, Hans Wennborg wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 9:37 PM Dimitry Andric wrote: ... >> Unfortunately the test-suite did not build at all, as all the Bitcode >> compilations failed with segfaults, similar to the following run under >> gdb: >> >> Starting program: >> /hom

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [10.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 1 is here

On 30 Jan 2020, at 20:38, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers wrote: > > It took a bit longer than planned due to master being a somewhat > unstable at the branch point, but Release Candidate 1 has now been > tagged as llvmorg-10.0.0-rc1. For this rc, I used three patches, which are attached. Ma

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 9.0.1-final has been tagged

On 20 Dec 2019, at 05:06, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: > > I've just tagged the 9.0.1-final release. Testers can begin uploading > binaries. For the final build, I used two patches, from: * https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42892 - After r356631, Sanitizer-i386-Test faills to

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 9.0.1-rc3 has been tagged

On 19 Dec 2019, at 23:51, Tom Stellard wrote: > > On 12/16/2019 10:30 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote: >> On 14 Dec 2019, at 07:34, Tom Stellard via Release-testers >> wrote: >>> >>> I've just tagged LLVM 9.0.1-rc3. Testers can begin testing and uploading >>> binaries. This will be the last release

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 9.0.1-rc3 has been tagged

On 14 Dec 2019, at 07:34, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: > > I've just tagged LLVM 9.0.1-rc3. Testers can begin testing and uploading > binaries. This will be the last release candidate unless there is a > major problem. I'm planning to tag the final release on Dec 19. For this rc,

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 9.0.1-rc2 has been tagged

On 7 Dec 2019, at 04:03, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: > I've tagged LLVM 9.0.1-rc2. Testers can begin testing and uploading binaries. > If all goes well, this will be the last -rc. For this rc, I used two patches, from: * https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42892 - After r356631,

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 9.0.1-rc1 Release has been tagged

On 23 Nov 2019, at 07:20, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: > > I've tagged the LLVM 9.0.1-rc1 release. Testers can begin testing and upload > binaries. I've also updated the test-release.sh script to pull from GitHub > instead of SVN, if you run into any issues with the new script, let

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [9.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 6 is here

On 19 Sep 2019, at 16:51, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 4:05 PM Hans Wennborg wrote: >> >> 9.0.0-rc6 was just tagged from the release_90 branch at r372100. In >> the Git monorepo, it's tagged as llvmorg-9.0.0-rc6. > > This has now been tagged as the fina

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [9.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 5 is here

On 13 Sep 2019, at 14:06, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers wrote: > > 9.0.0-rc5 was just tagged from the release_90 branch at r371837. In > the Git monorepo, it's tagged as llvmorg-9.0.0-rc5. For this rc, I used two patches, from: * https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42892 - After r356631,

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [9.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 4 is here

On 10 Sep 2019, at 12:26, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers wrote: > > 9.0.0-rc4 was just tagged from the release_90 branch at r371490. In > the Git monorepo, it's tagged as llvmorg-9.0.0-rc4. For this rc, I used two patches, from: * https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42892 - After r356631,

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [9.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 3 is here

On 30 Aug 2019, at 18:38, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers wrote: > > 9.0.0-rc3 was tagged today from the release_90 branch at r370450. In > the Git monorepo, it's tagged as llvmorg-9.0.0-rc3. For this rc, I used two patches, from: * https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42892 - After r356631

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [9.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 2 is here

On 14 Aug 2019, at 10:14, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers wrote: > > 9.0.0-rc2 was tagged yesterday from the release_90 branch at r368683. > In the Git monorepo it's available as the llvmorg-9.0.0-rc2 tag. For this rc, I only needed one patch, from: * https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [Release-testers] [9.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 1 is here

On 2019-08-06 22:59, Marshall Clow wrote: > Many of the failing libc++ tests are explicitly XFAILed for NetBSD; I wonder > if they should also be for FreeBSD. If they can't be fixed, then indeed they should be XFAILed. But maybe not right away, see below. >libcxx/thread/thread.threads/thr

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [9.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 1 is here

On 29 Jul 2019, at 16:32, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers wrote: > > 9.0.0-rc1 was just tagged from the release_90 branch at r367217 > (tagged as llvmorg-9.0.0-rc1 in the Git monorepo). The sanitizer tests went a lot better now, thanks to Alexander Richardson's patches in https://bugs.llvm.o

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] 8.0.1-final has been tagged

On 20 Jul 2019, at 05:21, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: > The 8.0.1 final release has been tagged. Testers please upload the final > binaries. As with 8.0.1 rc4, I had to disable compiler-rt for this test run, as most of the sanitizers are totally broken. This is tracked in PR40761.

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] 8.0.1-rc4 release has been tagged.

On 11 Jul 2019, at 05:24, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: > > I've tagged the 8.0.1-rc4 release, please begin testing. This will > (hopefully) > be the last release candidate. If all goes well, I will tag the final release > next Wednesday. As with 8.0.1 rc3, I had to disable compile

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 8.0.1-rc3

On 6 Jul 2019, at 04:36, Christian Gagneraud wrote: > > On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 at 22:16, Yvan Roux via cfe-dev > wrote: >>> Expected Passes: 53266 (rc2: 53259) >>> Expected Failures : 213 (rc2: 213) >>> Unsupported Tests : 1718 (rc2: 1719) >>> Unresolved Tests : 8 (rc2: 8) > >

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 8.0.1-rc3

On 28 Jun 2019, at 00:56, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: > > I've just tagged LLVM 8.0.1-rc3. Testers, please begin testing and report > results. As with 8.0.1 rc2, I had to disable compiler-rt for this test run, as most of the sanitizers are totally broken. This is tracked in PR4076

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 8.0.1-rc2 has been tagged

On 11 Jun 2019, at 05:53, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: > > I've tagged the 8.0.1-rc2 release, testers please begin testing and upload > your > binaries. As with 8.0.1 rc1, I had to disable compiler-rt for this test run, as most of the sanitizers are totally broken. This is tracked

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 7.1.0-final has been tagged

On 12 Apr 2019, at 02:00, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: > > I've just tagged LLVM 7.1.0-final. Testers, please upload the final binaries. Unfortunately in the 7.x branch, r345199 was not merged, which reverted commits r333103 ("Teach __libcpp_is_floating_point that __fp16 and _Float

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] Release 7.1.0 -rc1 has been tagged

On 27 Mar 2019, at 22:27, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: > > I've just tagged 7.1.0-rc1. Testers, please begin testing and reporting > results. Main test results on amd64-freebsd11: Expected Passes: 52441 Expected Failures : 232 Unsupported Tests : 3687 Unexpected Passe

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [8.0.0 Release] The final tag is in

On 18 Mar 2019, at 14:04, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers wrote: > The final version of 8.0.0 was just tagged from the release_80 branch > at r356364. It's identical to rc5 except for a few documentation > changes. Again, I had to disable compiler-rt for this test run, as most of the sanitize

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [8.0.0 Release] rc5 has been tagged

On 12 Mar 2019, at 12:16, Hans Wennborg via cfe-dev wrote: > 8.0.0-rc5 was just tagged from the release_80 branch at r355909. > > This is identical to rc4 with the addition of r355743. Hopefully it is the > final release candidate, so please give it a good testing. Again, I had to disable comp

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [8.0.0 Release] rc3 has been tagged

On 27 Feb 2019, at 19:51, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers wrote: > > 8.0.0-rc3 was just tagged from the release_80 branch at r355015. > > We're running a little behind schedule now, but I think we're also > close to be able to call this done. Again, I had to disable compiler-rt for this test

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [8.0.0 Release] rc2 has been tagged

On 7 Feb 2019, at 16:41, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers wrote: > 8.0.0-rc2 has been tagged from the release_80 branch at r353413. > > Please run the test script, share your results, and upload binaries. Unfortunately I had to disable compiler-rt for this test run, as most of the sanitizers

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [8.0.0 Release] rc1 has been tagged

On 24 Jan 2019, at 21:25, Dimitry Andric via Release-testers wrote: > > On 24 Jan 2019, at 20:34, Michał Górny wrote: >> >> On Thu, 2019-01-24 at 19:58 +0100, Dimitry Andric via Release-testers wrote: >>> On 24 Jan 2019, at 01:49, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers >>> wrote: 8.0.0

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [8.0.0 Release] rc1 has been tagged

On 24 Jan 2019, at 20:34, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Thu, 2019-01-24 at 19:58 +0100, Dimitry Andric via Release-testers > wrote: >> On 24 Jan 2019, at 01:49, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers >> wrote: >>> >>> 8.0.0-rc1 was just tagged (from the branch at r351980). >>> >>> It took a little lo

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [8.0.0 Release] rc1 has been tagged

On 24 Jan 2019, at 01:49, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers wrote: > > 8.0.0-rc1 was just tagged (from the branch at r351980). > > It took a little longer than planned, but it's looking good. > > Please run the test script, share your results, and upload binaries. Unfortunately I'm running in

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] 7.0.1-final has been tagged

On 20 Dec 2018, at 01:23, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: > > I've tagged the 7.0.1 final release. Testers may begin uploading binaries. Main test results on amd64-freebsd11 had 1 more Expected Pass compared to 7.0.1 rc3, and no more Passes With Retry: Expected Passes: 52445(

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 7.0.1-rc3 has been tagged.

On 8 Dec 2018, at 06:29, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: > > I've just tagged 7.0.1-rc3. This will hopefully be the last release > candidate. > Please test and report results. Main test results on amd64-freebsd11 have 12 more Expected Passes compared to 7.0.1 rc2, and 2 more Unexpect

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] 7.0.1-rc2 release has been tagged please begin testing

On 3 Nov 2018, at 03:35, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev wrote: > > The 7.0.1-rc2 release has been tagged and is ready for testing. I forgot > to bump the version number to 7.0.1 before I tagged -rc1, which is why we > are now on -rc2. Main test results on amd64-freebsd11 are mostly unchanged from 7

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [7.0.0 Release] The final tag is in

On 17 Sep 2018, at 13:41, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers wrote: > > The final version of 7.0.0 has been tagged from the branch at r342370. > It is identical to rc3 modulo release notes and docs changes. There weren't any code changes relative to rc3, so nothing changed in the test results e

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [7.0.0 Release] rc3 has been tagged

On 10 Sep 2018, at 16:12, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers wrote: > 7.0.0-rc3 was just tagged (from branch revision r341805). > > No further release candidates are currently planned, so this is a > release candidate in the real sense: unless any serious issues > surface, this is what the final

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [7.0.0 Release] rc2 has been tagged

On 27 Aug 2018, at 10:29, Hans Wennborg wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 12:46 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: ... >> Unfortunately the test-suite doesn't build on i386, since quite a few of its >> components requires SSE2, and the build shows many errors like: >> >> /home/dim/llvm/7.0.0/rc2/test-

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [7.0.0 Release] rc1 has been tagged

On 25 Aug 2018, at 00:51, Hans Wennborg wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 10:33 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: >> On 22 Aug 2018, at 18:45, Hans Wennborg wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 3:48 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote: On 22 Aug 2018, at 05:58, Wei Mi wrote: ... > Sorry I missed th

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [7.0.0 Release] rc2 has been tagged

On 23 Aug 2018, at 01:59, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers wrote: > > 7.0.0-rc2 was just tagged (from branch revision r340437). > > There have been a bunch of merges since rc1, and hopefully many of the > issues with the previous candidate are fixed in this one. By reverting r323281 locally,

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [7.0.0 Release] rc1 has been tagged

On 22 Aug 2018, at 18:45, Hans Wennborg wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 3:48 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote: >> On 22 Aug 2018, at 05:58, Wei Mi wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: >>> On 16 Aug 2018, at 00:51, Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-dev >>> wrote: O

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [7.0.0 Release] rc1 has been tagged

On 22 Aug 2018, at 05:58, Wei Mi wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 16 Aug 2018, at 00:51, Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-dev > wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 09:49:16PM +0200, Dimitry Andric via llvm-dev wrote: > >> This is a regression caused by https://r

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [7.0.0 Release] rc1 has been tagged

On 16 Aug 2018, at 00:51, Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-dev wrote: > On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 09:49:16PM +0200, Dimitry Andric via llvm-dev wrote: >> This is a regression caused by https://reviews.llvm.org/rL323281: >> >> >> r

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [Release-testers] [7.0.0 Release] rc1 has been tagged

On 16 Aug 2018, at 00:51, Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-dev wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 09:49:16PM +0200, Dimitry Andric via llvm-dev wrote: >> This is a regression caused by https://reviews.llvm.org/rL323281: >> >> >

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [7.0.0 Release] rc1 has been tagged

On 3 Aug 2018, at 13:37, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers wrote: > > Dear testers, > > 7.0.0-rc1 was just tagged (from the branch at r338847). > > It's early in the release process, but I'd like to find out what the > status is of the branch on our various platforms. > > Please run the test

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [7.0.0 Release] rc1 has been tagged

On 6 Aug 2018, at 18:23, Hans Wennborg wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 5, 2018 at 5:49 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: >> On 3 Aug 2018, at 13:37, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers >> wrote: >>> >>> 7.0.0-rc1 was just tagged (from the branch at r338847). ... > >> Hmm, I'm running into a rather nasty snag n

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [7.0.0 Release] rc1 has been tagged

On 3 Aug 2018, at 13:37, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers wrote: > > 7.0.0-rc1 was just tagged (from the branch at r338847). > > It's early in the release process, but I'd like to find out what the > status is of the branch on our various platforms. > > Please run the test script, share the r

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] The final tag is in

On 2 Mar 2018, at 13:17, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers wrote: > > The final version of 6.0.0 has just been tagged from the branch after > r326550. It has the same contents as -rc3 modulo release notes and one > small x86 fix (r326393). > > Please build the final binaries and upload to the s

Re: [lldb-dev] [Openmp-dev] [6.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 3 tagged

On 23 Feb 2018, at 16:14, Hans Wennborg via Openmp-dev wrote: > 6.0.0-rc3 was just tagged, after r325901 on the branch. > > There are still a few open blockers, but I'm not sure we'll actually > end up blocking on all of them. So depending on what comes up, this > release candidate is probably p

Re: [lldb-dev] [Openmp-dev] [cfe-dev] [Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 2 tagged

On 9 Feb 2018, at 22:30, Dimitry Andric wrote: > > On 9 Feb 2018, at 22:11, Dimitry Andric via Openmp-dev > wrote: >> >> On 9 Feb 2018, at 20:40, Dimitry Andric via cfe-dev >> wrote: >>> On 9 Feb 2018, at 10:20, Hans Wennborg wrote: >> ... What are all these test failures? Does i

Re: [lldb-dev] [Openmp-dev] [cfe-dev] [Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 2 tagged

On 9 Feb 2018, at 22:11, Dimitry Andric via Openmp-dev wrote: > > On 9 Feb 2018, at 20:40, Dimitry Andric via cfe-dev > wrote: >> >>> On 9 Feb 2018, at 10:20, Hans Wennborg wrote: > ... >>> What are all these test failures? Does it seems like they have a >>> common root cause and do we have

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 2 tagged

On 9 Feb 2018, at 20:40, Dimitry Andric via cfe-dev wrote: > >> On 9 Feb 2018, at 10:20, Hans Wennborg wrote: ... >> What are all these test failures? Does it seems like they have a >> common root cause and do we have a bug for it? ... > The Clang Tools and Extra Tools Unit tests all appear to

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 2 tagged

> On 9 Feb 2018, at 10:20, Hans Wennborg wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 10:43 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: >> On 7 Feb 2018, at 21:51, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers >> wrote: >>> >>> There's been a lot of merges since rc1, and hopefully the tests are in >>> a better state now. >>> >>> 6

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 2 tagged

On 7 Feb 2018, at 21:51, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers wrote: > > There's been a lot of merges since rc1, and hopefully the tests are in > a better state now. > > 6.0.0-rc2 was just tagged, after r324506. > > Please test, let me know how it goes, and upload binaries. Built, tested and upl

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [llvm-dev] [6.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 1 tagged

On 20 Jan 2018, at 13:32, Dimitry Andric via Release-testers wrote: > > On 19 Jan 2018, at 17:11, Hans Wennborg wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 7:27 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: >>> On 18 Jan 2018, at 15:03, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: Am 2018-01-18 14:55, schrieb Dimitry Andric via l

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 1 tagged

On 19 Jan 2018, at 17:11, Hans Wennborg wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 7:27 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: >> On 18 Jan 2018, at 15:03, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: >>> >>> Am 2018-01-18 14:55, schrieb Dimitry Andric via llvm-dev: On 17 Jan 2018, at 18:53, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 1 tagged

On 17 Jan 2018, at 18:53, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers wrote: > > Start your engines; 6.0.0-rc1 was just tagged. > > I know there are still open blockers and it's early in the process in > a way, but I'd like to find out where we are. Please run the test > script, let me know the results,

Re: [lldb-dev] Apple LLDB 900.0.64 crash

Hi Johan, If it is Apple specific, create a report on the Apple Bug Reporter, at https://bugreport.apple.com/ . If you can reproduce the error with stock lldb, please report it on the LLVM bugtracker, at https://bugs.llvm.org/enter_bug.cgi

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 1 tagged

On 18 Jan 2018, at 15:03, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: > > Am 2018-01-18 14:55, schrieb Dimitry Andric via llvm-dev: >> On 17 Jan 2018, at 18:53, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers >> wrote: >>> Start your engines; 6.0.0-rc1 was just tagged. >>> I know there are still open blockers and it's early in the

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 1 tagged

On 17 Jan 2018, at 18:53, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers wrote: > Start your engines; 6.0.0-rc1 was just tagged. > > I know there are still open blockers and it's early in the process in > a way, but I'd like to find out where we are. Please run the test > script, let me know the results, and

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [6.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 1 tagged

On 17 Jan 2018, at 18:53, Hans Wennborg via cfe-dev wrote: > > Start your engines; 6.0.0-rc1 was just tagged. > > I know there are still open blockers and it's early in the process in > a way, but I'd like to find out where we are. For an overview of what failed in the FreeBSD ports collection

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [6.0.0 Release] Scheduling the release

On 6 Dec 2017, at 18:28, Hans Wennborg via cfe-dev wrote: > > It's time to start making plans for the 6.0.0 release. > > Following our regular schedule, the branch would occur about two weeks > into January, on Wednesday 17 January 2018, with the goal of shipping > early March. This is the sche

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [5.0.0 Release] The final tag is in

On 5 Sep 2017, at 20:24, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers wrote: > > The final version of 5.0.0 has just been tagged. There were no changes > after rc5. Built and tested on FreeBSD 10, and uploaded: SHA256 (clang+llvm-5.0.0-amd64-unknown-freebsd10.tar.xz) = e55b646390da0a24e27f9761eecf0b3193

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [5.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 5 tagged

On 1 Sep 2017, at 23:07, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers wrote: > > 5.0.0-rc5 was just tagged. > > I had hoped rc4 would be the last one, but I think we needed the fix > for PR34381. Built and tested on FreeBSD 10, no changes with respect to the previous rc. I've uploaded: SHA256 (clang+l

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [5.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 4 tagged

On 30 Aug 2017, at 01:52, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers wrote: > > 5.0.0-rc4 was just tagged. > > There were very few changes after rc3, and if nothing unexpected comes > up, this is what the final release will look like. Built and tested on FreeBSD 10, no changes with respect to the previ

  1   2   >