Re: [Bug 85578] Re: ide secondary drives not recognized
--- On Mon, 1/26/09, Michele Mangili wrote: > From: Michele Mangili > Subject: [Bug 85578] Re: ide secondary drives not recognized > To: h...@yahoo.com > Date: Monday, January 26, 2009, 2:32 PM > Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping > to make > Ubuntu better. You reported this bug a while ago and there > hasn't been > any activity in it recently. We were wondering if this is > still an issue > for you. Can you try with the latest Ubuntu release? Thanks > in advance. > > -- > ide secondary drives not recognized > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/85578 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct > subscriber > of the bug. Michelle, Thanks, but I've since moved on to Mepis which never had this problem. I think the indicated problem may have been very specific to kernel number and motherboard details that only a few folks encountered. Thanks for asking. TJ Hoye -- ide secondary drives not recognized https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/85578 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 148599] Re: vmware player dependance problem
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9710483/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9710484/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9710485/ProcStatus.txt -- vmware player dependance problem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/148599 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 148599] vmware player dependance problem
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-panel In Ubuntu 7.10 I have problem to install vmware player. Apt-get say, that vmware-player-kernel-modules package has problem with dependencies. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Wed Oct 3 17:46:05 2007 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.10 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gnome-panel NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx Package: gnome-panel 1:2.20.0.1-0ubuntu4 PackageArchitecture: i386 ProcCmdline: gnome-panel --sm-client-id default1 ProcCwd: /home/yeti ProcEnviron: PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=sk_SK.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gnome-panel Uname: Linux yeti-laptop 2.6.22-12-generic #1 SMP Sun Sep 23 18:11:30 GMT 2007 i686 GNU/Linux ** Affects: gnome-panel (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug -- vmware player dependance problem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/148599 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 135358] Re: vmware-player not installable
Hi! By install vmware-player from this source I have second problem: Starting VMware services: Virtual machine monitorfailed Virtual ethernet failed Module vmnet is not loaded. Please verify that it is loaded before running this script. invoke-rc.d: initscript vmware-player, action "start" failed. dpkg: chyba pri spracovávaní vmware-player (--configure): podproces post-installation script vrátil chybový kód 1 Počas spracovania sa vyskytli chyby: vmware-player E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) -- vmware-player not installable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/135358 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 85578] Re: ide secondary drives not recognized
As of April 10, 2007: 7.04 with 2.6.20-14 kernel and latest synaptic updates is much improved over my earlier complaints. The good news is: 1 I was able to load LiveCD, install to SATA primary and do on-line updating. 2 My secondary IDE master hard drive is now accessible and readable. I haven't tried executing installed distros there yet. 3. Your newer 8187 wifi module is working fine as far as I can tell. The remaining not-so-good news is: 1 Even though I have 512k of ram with 32k given to video, my Live cd install was iffy because free mem was only about 6k. Not enough for Firefox and console together, for example. 2. My secondary IDE slave cdrw is *not* accessible, even though /etc/fstab expects it at /dev/scd0 /media/cdrom (or cdrom0). There is no /dev/scd0 entry. 3. Boot-up is extremely slow, 3-5 minutes, but seems much longer. A similar condition on PCLinuxOS with 2.6.18 kernel exists. On that distro, I can see the boot time hang-up is the result of three unsuccessful tries at reading ide drive parameters. yeti -- ide secondary drives not recognized https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/85578 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 105353] cdrom on ide secondary not found
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: linux-source-2.6.20 As of April 10, 2007, status of bug earlier defined as 85578: (SATA primary and IDE secondary drives on Intel ICH5 hardware) 7.04 with 2.6.20-14 kernel and latest synaptic updates is much improved over my earlier complaints. The good news is: 1 I was able to load LiveCD, install to SATA primary and do on-line updating. 2 My secondary IDE master hard drive is now accessible and readable. I haven't tried executing installed distros there yet. 3. Your newer 8187 wifi module is working fine as far as I can tell. 4. Newest versions of Firefox and OpenOffice are great. 5. No problem with many programs loaded simultaneously; System very responsive. The remaining not-so-good news is: 1 Even though I have 512k of ram with 32k given to video, my Live cd install was iffy because free mem was only about 6k. Not enough for Firefox and console together, for example. 2. My secondary IDE slave cdrw is *not* accessible, even though /etc/fstab expects it at /dev/scd0 /media/cdrom (or cdrom0). There is no /dev/scd0 entry. 3. Boot-up is extremely slow, 3+ minutes, but seems much longer. The boot time hang-up is probably the result of three unsuccessful tries at reading ide drive parameters. Hoping you will help me reclaim my ide cdrw and speed up booting. yeti ** Affects: linux-source-2.6.20 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- cdrom on ide secondary not found https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105353 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 105353] Re: cdrom on ide secondary not found
addendum: I think bugs 95105 and 95407 have similar symptoms to what I observe. yeti -- cdrom on ide secondary not found https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105353 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 103258] Re: wireless network suddenly breaks
This applet *was* working for me on April 10, yesterday, after a large synaptic update. *Not* working today, April 11, after yet another large update. Networking itself still largely functional. Yesterday, system had an annoying habit of not retaining wep key info. Today, system doesn't keep asking for wep key, but fails to do dhclient wlan0 on its own. Also doesn't show pretty bars icon any more. -- wireless network suddenly breaks https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103258 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 95407] Re: CDROM drive no longer mounts (7.04 Beta)
See 105353, 103780, 95105 and 96857 as possibly related. -- CDROM drive no longer mounts (7.04 Beta) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/95407 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 103410] Re: libata fail to initialize LITE-ON LTR-40125S
I think you've probably identified my problem stated in 105353, and maybe also for 103780, 95105, 96857 and 95407. I have an ide lite-on cdrw that's not mounting, and probably slowing down booting by about two minutes besides. Here's what some of my dmesg looks like (probably during the two minutes hang-up). dmesg | less | grep ata2.01 [ 26.182996] ata2.01: ATAPI, max UDMA/33 [ 56.141638] ata2.01: qc timeout (cmd 0xef) [ 56.141650] ata2.01: failed to set xfermode (err_mask=0x4) [ 91.586051] ata2.01: qc timeout (cmd 0xef) [ 91.586063] ata2.01: failed to set xfermode (err_mask=0x4) [ 91.586071] ata2.01: limiting speed to UDMA/33:PIO3 [ 127.030464] ata2.01: qc timeout (cmd 0xef) [ 127.030475] ata2.01: failed to set xfermode (err_mask=0x4) [ 127.030481] ata2.01: disabled So, is this something *I* can fix, or what? -- libata fail to initialize LITE-ON LTR-40125S https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103410 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 105353] Re: cdrom on ide secondary not found
Bug 103780 is probably also related. Bug 103410 probably definitively nails this problem down. For the record, my 'cdrom' as a LITE-ON 48125W -- cdrom on ide secondary not found https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105353 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 103258] Re: wireless network suddenly breaks
No change after April 12 updates. -- wireless network suddenly breaks https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103258 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 103410] Re: libata fail to initialize LITE-ON LTR-40125S
In the context of the previous material, *I* have no idea how to 'patch' anything. I presume that is what kernel developers do. I'm interested if there is a work-around for mere mortals prior to a kernel fix. -- libata fail to initialize LITE-ON LTR-40125S https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103410 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 103410] Re: libata fail to initialize LITE-ON LTR-40125S
Comments on Bug 96857 may indicate that a possible solution for this problem, or part of it, is being worked by the kernel group. -- libata fail to initialize LITE-ON LTR-40125S https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103410 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 103410] Re: libata fail to initialize LITE-ON LTR-40125S
You could be right, lazka. Maybe a bad guess, or a wild hope; we'll see. I hope they're working on this problem. -- libata fail to initialize LITE-ON LTR-40125S https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103410 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 95105] Re: kernel.log syslog filling up with repeated ata2 and cdrom messages
I have a similar problem, to frafu's complaint with 7.04, either 2.6.12 or 2.6.14 kernels, but I describe it this way: *IDE LITE-ON cdrw on PATA secondary slave position will not mount* with SATA on primary master, Intel ICH5 controller. 7.04 otherwise quite responsive. Hopefully, excerpt of my kern.log for one boot-up is attached. ** Attachment added: "kern.txt" http://librarian.launchpad.net/7302233/kern.txt -- kernel.log syslog filling up with repeated ata2 and cdrom messages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/95105 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 103258] Re: wireless network suddenly breaks
Synaptic upgrade to Network Manager 0.6.4-6ubuntu6 doesn't help, either. -- wireless network suddenly breaks https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103258 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 103258] Re: wireless network suddenly breaks
After 7.04 full synaptic upgrade April 13, Network Manager 0.6.4-ubuntu7 allows review of manual configuration, but does not give connection status info. Also, no bars icon. -- wireless network suddenly breaks https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103258 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 82927] Re: [feisty fawn] NetworkManager reports incorrect online status
After 7.04 full synaptic upgrade April 13, Network Manager 0.6.4-ubuntu7 - has some harmless, extraneous entries in /etc/network/interfaces - does dhcp and dns duties ok - allows review of manual configuration - does *not* report status info via bars ico; it's missing. -- [feisty fawn] NetworkManager reports incorrect online status https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/82927 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 82927] Re: [feisty fawn] NetworkManager reports incorrect online status
Sorry, that's Bug 103258. -- [feisty fawn] NetworkManager reports incorrect online status https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/82927 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 82927] Re: [feisty fawn] NetworkManager reports incorrect online status
April 13 synaptic update network-manager (0.6.4-6ubuntu7) feisty *does not* provide connection status information as it did April 10. See Bug 103528 for some history. Network functions are ok, but I expect there are more gui products that are not coming thru on my install of 7.04 with all the latest synaptic stuff. -- [feisty fawn] NetworkManager reports incorrect online status https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/82927 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 95105] Re: kernel.log syslog filling up with repeated ata2 and cdrom messages
Problem still there with 2.6.20-15.24 generic -- kernel.log syslog filling up with repeated ata2 and cdrom messages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/95105 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 105234] Re: Network manager says disconnected but is connected and working
It might help if folks would indicate whether wired or wireless, if they think this problem is fixed. I'm *wireless*, and it's *not* fixed for me. Im using 7.04 upgraded thru 2.6.20-15.24, including the latest NM upgrade. My network functions just fine, but I get no status information at all from NM. How is it that this thread has the heading *Fix Released*, anyway? -- Network manager says disconnected but is connected and working https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105234 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 105234] Re: Network manager says disconnected but is connected and working
Peter Garrett Meaning applet reports nothing. Applet allows me to see configuration details only. -- Network manager says disconnected but is connected and working https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105234 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 109130] Re: ATA errors cause LONG boot time in Feisty
Fedora 7 has solved this problem for my hardware. Its latest kernel, 2.6.21-1.3228.fc7, no longer needs 'irqpoll' (here, anyway) to get around the long boot-up delay and the lack of access to some ide resources. This is a little bit ahead of the 2.6.22 'upstream' kernel patch rumored to address this problem. The irqpoll work-around has been a satisfactory work-around for my ubuntu install. I can't say I've found any downside to it in my uses of linux, which are all pretty tame things like wireless, firefox, openoffice and such. -- ATA errors cause LONG boot time in Feisty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109130 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 96826] Re: Feisty Beta does not recognise CD burner
Fedora 7 has solved this problem for my hardware. Its latest kernel, 2.6.21-1.3228.fc7, no longer needs 'irqpoll' (here, anyway) to get around the long boot-up delay and the lack of access to some ide resources. This is a little bit ahead of the 2.6.22 'upstream' kernel patch rumored to address this problem. The irqpoll work-around has been a satisfactory work-around for my ubuntu install. I can't say I've found any downside to it in my uses of linux, which are all pretty tame things like wireless, firefox, openoffice and such. -- Feisty Beta does not recognise CD burner https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96826 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 96826] Re: Feisty Beta does not recognise CD burner
irqpoll still needed here. -- Feisty Beta does not recognise CD burner https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96826 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 103410] Re: libata fail to initialize LITE-ON LTR-40125S
Re Today's 2.6.20, irqpoll still needed here. My lite-on is 48125W cdrw. -- libata fail to initialize LITE-ON LTR-40125S https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103410 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 103410] Re: libata fail to initialize LITE-ON LTR-40125S
Perhaps the *kernel* part of this problem (here) has been solved, and the remaining issues resides *elsewhere* in the Ubuntu source. Two clues in this regard: 1-Similar LITE-ON problems (here) exist in PCLinuxOS with 2.6.18 kernel are also *resolved* with the Bug 105437 approach; and 2-Fedora Core 6, with 2.6.18 kernel does *not* have the LITE-ON problem (here). The (here) qualifier means maybe my problems are related to SATA/PATA mixed drives and Intel ICH5 driver as well as LITE-ON peculiarities of my hardware setup. -- libata fail to initialize LITE-ON LTR-40125S https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103410 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 96826] Re: Feisty Beta does not recognise CD burner
The irqpoll addition to the kernel line works for me. There is another work-around which is easy to try mentioned in Bug 105437. Ubuntu folks should co-ordinate this Bug 96826 with Bug 103410. -- Feisty Beta does not recognise CD burner https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96826 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 103410] Re: libata fail to initialize LITE-ON LTR-40125S
Bug 96826 wins the prize for solving my LITE-ON problems, Just add irqpoll as a kernel option. No more need to 'beat the clock' opening the cdrw before booting, the runner-up solution from Bug 105437. -- libata fail to initialize LITE-ON LTR-40125S https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103410 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 103410] Re: libata fail to initialize LITE-ON LTR-40125S
Bug 105437 observation holds the key to my LITE-ON problems: - solves the delay problem; - creates /dev/scd0 and mounts scd0 as a cdrom; and - also allows /dev/scd0 to work as a cdrw. I'm using 2.6.20-15.27 kernel. -- libata fail to initialize LITE-ON LTR-40125S https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103410 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 96826] Re: Feisty Beta does not recognise CD burner
Reading up on kernel options, I found the following notes on irqpoll in: usr/share/doc/kernel-doc-2.6.21/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt irqpoll (detail deleted) Intended to get systems with badly broken firmware running. Maybe, as Pogo said: 'We have found the enemy, and we are it.' __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- Feisty Beta does not recognise CD burner https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96826 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 103410] Re: libata fail to initialize LITE-ON LTR-40125S
2.6.20-15.25 doesn't fix it here, either. Also no need for kernel upgrades to over-write /boot/grub/menu.lst if the kernel descriptor is not changed. This unnecessarily spoils mult- boot menu.lst constructions. 2.6.20-15.24 and .25 are both called 2.6.20-15-generic in menu.lst. -- libata fail to initialize LITE-ON LTR-40125S https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103410 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 103258] Re: wireless network suddenly breaks
I'm really impressed that network manager feisty bug list went from 155 complaints to 17 in just a few hours today. May as well add this one as 'solved' too; I don't think it is a kernel problem. -- wireless network suddenly breaks https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103258 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 103410] Re: libata fail to initialize LITE-ON LTR-40125S
Do you mean 2.6.20-15.26? It's not on my Synaptic yet. Good to hear, if true. Ready to tune out if not. -- libata fail to initialize LITE-ON LTR-40125S https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103410 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 103410] Re: libata fail to initialize LITE-ON LTR-40125S
2.6.20-15.27 doesn't fix it for me. Still long bootup delay. Still no /dev entry for cdrw; my /etc/fstab expects /dev/ scd-something. No /dev/sc* or /dev/hd* Perhaps with my ICH5 hardware, I may have to wait for 2.6.22? That may be what this link is about: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/9/214 This is a tough problem. It goes back to Bug 8196 for some folks. -- libata fail to initialize LITE-ON LTR-40125S https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103410 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 95105] Re: kernel.log syslog filling up with repeated ata2 and cdrom messages
The latest 2.6.20-15-generic may get you going. Try a synaptic update. If not, tell us what SATA controller you have, and what drive(s) are on your PATA end of things, and are they ok or not. kernel folks may appreciate a *full* dmesg (as an attachment) -- kernel.log syslog filling up with repeated ata2 and cdrom messages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/95105 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 105688] Re: NetworkManager applet shows No network connection when there is a network connection
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 105234 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105234 philb28 Your /etc/network/interfaces looks like mine, except I have more interesting essid and wireless-key entries. As a possibility go to System:Preferences:Sessions:Start-up and see if Network Manager is *enabled* or not. -- NetworkManager applet shows No network connection when there is a network connection https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105688 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 96857] Re: Feisty Beta: debian-installer does not mount cdrom
Neither 2.6.20-15.25 or -15.27 this solve problem for ICH5 and actual (as opposed to virtual) IDE cdrw. Maybe there's a resource conflict you can work around. Here's what I get for for 'dmesg | grep quirk' at the command line: [ 21.438490] PCI quirk: region 1000-107f claimed by ICH4 ACPI/GPIO/TCO [ 21.438494] PCI quirk: region 1080-10bf claimed by ICH4 GPIO -- Feisty Beta: debian-installer does not mount cdrom https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96857 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 8196] Re: ATAPI CD-ROM not detected in system with SATA
--- Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The original bug here is that ATAPI drives were not > being detected by > libata. That issue was fixed by enabling ATAPI in > the libata header. > > If people are still having issues, they are need to > file separate bug > reports. Most likely it is a case of the PATA/SATA > driver not being > present, so include lspci -vv and lspci -vvn output > for your system. > > -- > ATAPI CD-ROM not detected in system with SATA > https://launchpad.net/bugs/8196 Ben, Please read 85578 from the beginning. Note the material I have already supplied. Maybe the problem is in 'the installer'. Anyways, _lots_ of Ubuntu people have this problem. I suspect Fedora, Knoppix and I _know_ Mepis people _don't_ have this problem. I'd like my Ubuntu to work as well as my Mepis. Respectfully, yeti yeti > Bored stiff? Loosen up... Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games. http://games.yahoo.com/games/front -- ATAPI CD-ROM not detected in system with SATA https://launchpad.net/bugs/8196 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 8196] Re: ATAPI CD-ROM not detected in system with SATA
--- Mark Shuttleworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > yeti wrote: > > I suspect Fedora, Knoppix and I _know_ Mepis people > > _don't_ have this problem. I'd like my Ubuntu to > > work as well as my Mepis. > > > If Mepis detects these drives then it should be > straightforward for us > to make sure we do the same. > > -- > ATAPI CD-ROM not detected in system with SATA > https://launchpad.net/bugs/8196 > Thanks for your concern, Mark. FYI, my version of the 8196 complaint, and some supporting data are set forth in 85578. My problem is probably peculiar to Gigabyte motherboard and use of SATA primary with ATAPI secondary. Regards, yeti Have a burning question? Go to www.Answers.yahoo.com and get answers from real people who know. -- ATAPI CD-ROM not detected in system with SATA https://launchpad.net/bugs/8196 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 85578] Re: ide secondary drives not recognized
Ben, You may be interested in the following: I replaced the Ubuntu 2.6.17-11 kernel, initrd and /lib/modules/2.6.17-11 with 2.6.15-27 equivalents from Mepis and now my missing secondary drives are back where they belong. Whether or not there may be some latent inconsistencies between the Mepis kernel and the rest of the Ubuntu distro, I'll let you know. yeti -- ide secondary drives not recognized https://launchpad.net/bugs/85578 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 85578] Re: ide secondary drives not recognized
--- Mark Reitblatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > yeti, > > If you haven't already, could you please test with > the latest Feisty > release and post the results here? > http://www.ubuntu.com/testing > > Thank you. > > -- > ide secondary drives not recognized > https://launchpad.net/bugs/85578 > Mark, If by 'the latest Feisty you mean 7.04 Herd 5, then things are worse, not better. LiveCD will hangs the system before it even completes reading in. Finding fabulous fares is fun. Let Yahoo! FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight and hotel bargains. http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097 -- ide secondary drives not recognized https://launchpad.net/bugs/85578 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 85578] Re: ide secondary drives not recognized
Both the earlier Ubuntu 7.04 alpha 5 and one downloaded on 3/16/07 gag (lock-up) computer if rtl8187 wifi is attached. Earlier alpha 5 passes its own md5sum check. New alpha 5 passes md5 sum check before and after burning to cd. If wifi not attached, earlier 7.04 alpha 5 sees _only_ sata primary; later 7.04 alpha 5 sees _only_ ide secondary. Please recall this sata/ide problem was originally reported as 6.1 Ubuntu problem not seeing ide secondary. No wifi problem at all in 6.1 PCLinuxOS, with a 2.6.18 kernel, also has trouble with sata primary and ide secondary. Takes 'forever' on boot- up, eventually giving up on the ide drives, examining and rejecting each partition one at a time. -- ide secondary drives not recognized https://launchpad.net/bugs/85578 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 85578] ide secondary drives not recognized
Public bug reported: sata primary drives are recognized but ide secondary drives, one hdd, one cdrw not recognized. peculiar to ubuntu installs: latest ubuntu, mint 2.1, mint 2.2. Not a problem with Fedora 6, Mepis 6, KNOPPIX 5.5. Perhaps a clue , in the ubuntu installs, /dev sections are missing: /dev/cdrom->hdd and /dev/cdrw->hdd are not there as they are in Fedora, Mepis and KNOPPIX. ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- ide secondary drives not recognized https://launchpad.net/bugs/85578 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 85578] Re: ide secondary drives not recognized
Thanks, Brian, for the fast reply. The attached lspci shows we have a Gigabyte mb. I use a new sata drive as primary. I have my old ide hd and cdrw plugged into ide secondary. For Knoppix and Mepis, the ide drives show up as hdc (for the ide hard drive) and hdd for the cdrw. My ubu was originally a 6.1 rc, but has been updated about daily; Mint 2.1 and 2.2 also very current. I should add that the ubu install has no entries fo hdc (hdc1,hdc5,hdc6,hdc7) or hdd. For cdrw or cdrom, Ubu looks for scd0, as I recall, but that's not in ubu's /dev either. I think that the Mepis clue may be significant, since it is also ubu based. Otherwise quite happy with ubu and its children. ** Attachment added: "lspci for bug 85578" http://librarian.launchpad.net/6451584/lspci.txt -- ide secondary drives not recognized https://launchpad.net/bugs/85578 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 85578] Re: ide secondary drives not recognized
Brian, Here's lspci.vvn ** Attachment added: "lspci.vvn for bug 85578" http://librarian.launchpad.net/6452573/lspci.vvn.txt -- ide secondary drives not recognized https://launchpad.net/bugs/85578 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 85578] Re: ide secondary drives not recognized
here's dmesg for Mepis 6 ** Attachment added: "dmesg for mepis6" http://librarian.launchpad.net/6452800/dmesg.mepis6 -- ide secondary drives not recognized https://launchpad.net/bugs/85578 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 85578] Re: ide secondary drives not recognized
Here's dmesg for ubuntu 6.1 ** Attachment added: "dmesg for ubuntu 6.1" http://librarian.launchpad.net/6452783/dmesg.ubu6 -- ide secondary drives not recognized https://launchpad.net/bugs/85578 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 85578] Re: ide secondary drives not recognized
before installation, using ubuntu live, secondary drives show up in /dev as sdb1, sdb5, sdb6, sdb7 for the secondary hd /dev/cdrom and /dev/cdrw both linked to /dev/scd0 after installion, ubuntu has no entries for sdb-anything no entries for sc-anything no entries for hd-anything no entries for cd-anything command line qtparted & shows an error message (see below) while qtparted gui shows only sda info. command line error message [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/tjhoye# X Error: BadDevice, invalid or uninitialized input device 168 Major opcode: 145 Minor opcode: 3 Resource id: 0x0 Failed to open device X Error: BadDevice, invalid or uninitialized input device 168 Major opcode: 145 Minor opcode: 3 Resource id: 0x0 Failed to open device Session management error: Authentication Rejected, reason : None of the authentication protocols specified are supported and host-based authentication failed -- ide secondary drives not recognized https://launchpad.net/bugs/85578 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 85578] Re: ide secondary drives not recognized
** Description changed: + sata primary drives are recognized but - ide secondary drives, one hdd, one cdrw not recognized. - peculiar to ubuntu installs: latest ubuntu, mint 2.1, mint 2.2. + ide secondary drives, one hdd, one cdrw are not recognized. + peculiar to Ubuntu installs: latest Ubuntu 6.1, Mint 2.1, Mint 2.2 and GNewSense1.0. Not a problem with Fedora 6, Mepis 6, KNOPPIX 5.5. - Perhaps a clue , in the ubuntu installs, /dev sections are missing: + + Perhaps a clue , + + AFTER INSTALL FROM LIVE UBUNTU CD + + /dev sections are missing: /dev/cdrom->hdd and /dev/cdrw->hdd are not there as they are in Fedora, Mepis and KNOPPIX. + + PROBLEM IN UBUNTU LIVE CD INSTALLER or PARTITION EDITOR? -- ide secondary drives not recognized https://launchpad.net/bugs/85578 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 86383] Ubuntu 6.1 installer ignores Intel driver clues
Public bug reported: Ubuntu 6.1 does not automatically install an i810 driver as it should for Intel 865 chipsets. Even so, dmesg will show the message 'agpgart: Detected an Intel 865 Chipset.' That's the clue: /etc/X11/xorg.conf will need to call for an i810 driver for the 865 (and a lot of other) Intel chipsets. It would be nice if the Ubuntu installer figured this out for us ahead of time. It knows enough to be using agpgart for something or other. It should then pass along the i810 clue to xorg.conf. ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Ubuntu 6.1 installer ignores Intel driver clues https://launchpad.net/bugs/86383 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 8196] Re: ATAPI CD-ROM not detected in system with SATA
High Priority ? This problem is a subset of 85578. Apparently first identified 2 1/2 years ago and still not fixed Is anyone at Ubuntu really concerned? Fedora, KNOPPIX and Mepis don't have this problem. yeti -- ATAPI CD-ROM not detected in system with SATA https://launchpad.net/bugs/8196 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 456977] Re: Lots of errors from the rt2x00pci driver
This bug, as originally described by Dima concerns the rt2500pci wlan spamming dmesg. Probably due to the kernel requesting the wlan for a mode the wlan cant recognize. It was recognized as a kernel problem as early as Sept 2009 and taken aboard by the kernel group at that time. Google 'rt2500pci spamming syslogd'. The problem, and the workaround still persist, for me, for 2.26.32. Others report the problem 'solved' in 2.26.34.999. Log spamming by alsa is a different problem, which can probably be solved by using alsamixer -c 0 to cut down on alsa pcm and output levels. yeti -- Lots of errors from the rt2x00pci driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456977 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 539794] Re: rt2500pci wireless regression in lucid
See also #456977 for comments. There are some work-arounds for many of the wlan symptoms, and possibly a cure in 2.6.34.999. yeti -- rt2500pci wireless regression in lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/539794 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 539794] Re: rt2500pci wireless regression in lucid
Thanks zob, I will look into this approach. My solution was just to put 'sudo iwconfig wlan0 power off' into /etc/rc.local. That's how I try to do most of my work-arounds. I must admit, working around network-manager may _require_ your approach for some iwconfig selections. -- rt2500pci wireless regression in lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/539794 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 539794] Re: rt2500pci wireless regression in lucid
Work-around noted in #21 still required in my installation, with 2.6.32-22 kernel just updated from original Ubuntu 10.04. -- rt2500pci wireless regression in lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/539794 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 577331] Re: fsck cannot be ignored with plymouth
comments, fwiw: 1.#577485 re showfsck is related. 2.my installation says it will fsck every 20 boots. 3.no fsck has ever shown any errors. 4.why are we doing so often an fsck on a journalled fs, anyway? -- fsck cannot be ignored with plymouth https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/577331 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 366471] Re: Calendar closed unexpectedly
I'm experiencing this very same error reported previously (I quote original report): "kwatson512 wrote on 2009-05-10: #62 The issue is exactly as in my first post. Open evolution with the account connected to a Microsoft exchange server; switch to calendar; data begins to populate the calendar, but after 10 to 20 seconds, data disappears and the "evolution calendar quit unexpectedly" warning appears. This happens in Xubuntu 9.04 with evolution-exchange version 2.26.0-0ubuntu3." I'm running Ubuntu 9.10 (32 bits). Tried many ways of installation, and the bug was still there. Then, moved Synaptic to "proposed" level; and persists. Would you reopen this bug? Regards -- Calendar closed unexpectedly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366471 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 449268] Re: Karmic Restricted Driver Bug
I also have a new Dell 1545 with this problem. Just using live cd for now. Wireless worked ok on ubu 9.04 but not on 9.10 just as others have said. My Dell calls the wireless 1397; dmesg | grep -i bcm says bcm4315, lspci | grep bcm says bcm4312 802.11 b/g rev 01. No typo, 4312 not 4315, go figure. Doing the install bcmwl kernel source gets the following modules into play: lib80211_crypt_tkip, and wl; in ubu9.04 it was ieee80211_crypt_tkip and wl. Wireless very good with these installed. I really believe this ought to get fixed. The hang-up here is rather nasty when the wrong drivers are loaded. -- Karmic Restricted Driver Bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449268 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 575293] Re: mountall trying to check mounts with pass=0
mountall 2.15 is available as a backport to 10.04 LTS. Try apt or synaptic. Dev group is working on (at least) mountall 2.5, but I don't know where you'd get that. I don't know if either of these will help, but it may be worth a try at least for 2.15 -- mountall trying to check mounts with pass=0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575293 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 575293] Re: mountall trying to check mounts with pass=0
Forget the previous mountall 2.5 comment, that's a much earlier version of mountall. I'm not happy that mountall 2.15 forces long-winded fscks of presumably clean ext3 partitions. In my case, it's a trivial two-minute wait, once every 20 mounts, but I don't think this delay should be there for a journaled system mounted read-only. -- mountall trying to check mounts with pass=0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575293 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 570848] Re: Mountall/plymouth don't report mount errors, dump to read-only root shell
Scott Using mountall 2.15, kernel 2.6.33-22 generic #33, here's what I get during the obligatory fsck, which I think applies only to one clean 6Gb ext3 partition. fsck without debug takes about two minutes, which I think is way too long. ** Attachment added: "bootlog for mountall obligatory fsck" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49408803/boot.log -- Mountall/plymouth don't report mount errors, dump to read-only root shell https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/570848 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 577331] Re: fsck cannot be ignored with plymouth
I think this bug may be a byproduct of the bug described in 540801. A work-around for 540801 confirmed by many is proposed there. I'd be interested to know if anyone else sees the (or a) connection. I haven't tried that fix myself, because I don't understand it well enough. -- fsck cannot be ignored with plymouth https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/577331 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 539794] Re: rt2500pci wireless regression in lucid
@jhoechtl and @zob Just to be clear on my rt2500pci comments and status: 1. For me, the speed problem went away entirely with the latest 10.04 kernel. 2. For me, the new problem of spamming the logs is solved with no performance penalty with a small /etc/rc.local command. 3. Neither problem was more than a minor inconvenience once a work-around was discovered. I'm always much more interested in a timely work-around than some grand fix. That's because I'm more interesting in my present system doing my apps now. I'll never understand all the programming details anyway. I can imagine the collision between kernel programming and trying to deal with proprietary wireless hardware may be very difficult, however. You can get a feel for this by following the kernel-bug 13362 dialog. -- rt2500pci wireless regression in lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/539794 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 539794] Re: rt2500pci wireless regression in lucid
Full disclosure details: lspci excerpt: RaLink RT2500 802.11g Cardbus/mini-PCI (rev 01) cat /proc/version: Linux version 2.6.32-22-generic (bui...@rothera) (gcc version 4.4.3 (Ubuntu 4.4.3-4ubuntu5) ) #33-Ubuntu SMP Wed Apr 28 13:27:30 UTC 2010 /etc/rc.local excerpt: #iwconfig wlan0 rate 54M iwconfig wlan0 power off Comments relative to these noted details: 1. The 'rate problem' has been around for a long time; my need for the first rc.local line has gone away with the kernel noted. I don't have a regression, I have an improvement. 2. The 'log spamming problem' has been around at least since ubuntu9.10; I first noticed it in Lucid, but others reported a version of it in Bug 456977. It's being worked on by the Kernel group, see Kernel Bug 13362. It's not a regression, per se. No sense in recording this stuff. 3. AFAIK, 'power off' are just magic words to disable power management on the wlan, management capabilities my hardware may not have. YMMV. -- rt2500pci wireless regression in lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/539794 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 539794] Re: rt2500pci wireless regression in lucid
A further thought on the situation: 4. Signal strength does make a difference here. At -69 to -67 dbm or three bars on the network manager icon, my broadband works works very well; At -73 or -72 dbm or two bars, my broadband is noticeably poorer; and At -75 dbm my broadband gives up. I have the feeling the latest kernel may have much improved the SNR situation for the rt2500 hardware. In my case my broadband performance with Linux is now on a par with that of XP. I get my dbms from iwconfig and my broadband test from SpeedTest.net. I get my broadband from Verizon FiOS, usually at about 15Mbps. -- rt2500pci wireless regression in lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/539794 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 584050] [NEW] lucid fsck takes too long
Public bug reported: cat proc/version Linux version 2.6.32-22-generic (bui...@rothera) (gcc version 4.4.3 (Ubuntu 4.4.3-4ubuntu5) ) #33-Ubuntu SMP Wed Apr 28 13:27:30 UTC 2010 mountall --version mountall 2.15 Copyright (C) 2010 Canonical Ltd. This is not bug 571707; mountall 2.15 solved that really long hang-up here. fsck using knoppix on /dev/sda4 takes less than a second. Lucid fsck occurring every 20 mounts takes one minute 40 seconds when it occurs. /dev/sda4 is ext3, a journalled system; if 'clean' it takes less than a second to fsck. I suspect somehow lucid partition is being marked 'not clean' and is getting the whole nine yards fsck. This is no _big_ problem, but things are not quite right. Perhaps a minor additional tweak of mountall is in order. ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- lucid fsck takes too long https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/584050 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 584339] Re: Old SiS video needs v86d for Lucid Plymouth
** Also affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Old SiS video needs v86d for Lucid Plymouth https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/584339 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 540801] Re: X server starts before Plymouth, or a very short time after (no or brief splash)
I've found a simple workaround for Old SiS video that improves the appearance at boot-up a lot for me. See bug 584339. -- X server starts before Plymouth, or a very short time after (no or brief splash) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540801 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 579604] Re: Lot of errors in dmesg with rt2500-pci (10.04)
bebertii: I also have an rt2500 that complains too much with the 2.6.32 kernel. You can turn off the dmesg spam from rt2500 by adding the following line to /etc/rc.local: 'iwconfig wlan0 power off' without the quotes, of course. This disables 2.6.32 kernel's futile, possibly un-intended (my guesses), attempts to control rt2500 power management. I don't understand why the 'freeze some time' happens for you. You should probably try to find out more specifically what's causing the freezes. For example, see if the sheer volume of stuff in /var/log has anything to do with the freeze. dmesg and kern.log are keeping every last one of these little complaints. In my case, I am unaware of any performance problem if this is just ignored. Similarly, I am unaware of any problem from turning off the spam. So I do. -- Lot of errors in dmesg with rt2500-pci (10.04) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579604 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 584050] Re: lucid fsck takes too long
pps Anyone caring to verify this may find it convenient to hurry-up the process to the next fsck. If showfsck indicates the max count to be 20, then the command tune2fs -C 21 /dev/sda4, or whatever the Ubuntu partition is, will make the fsck come up on the very next boot. FWIW, fsck should only look at drives called-out in /etc/fstab. In my case, the ntsf partition for XL does not show. -- lucid fsck takes too long https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/584050 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 530554] Re: video=sisfb on menu.list / grub.cfg no longer works Ubuntu Lucid
I have a similar SiS video card and kernel 2.6.32-22 . With Lucid I get my best performance by adding the following: 'video=sisfb:mode:1024x768x32,rate:70,mem:4096' between 'ro' and 'quiet splash' in the grub menu entry. Leave off the quote marks, be precise with punctuation. Hope that works for others. -- video=sisfb on menu.list / grub.cfg no longer works Ubuntu Lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/530554 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 584339] Re: Old SiS video needs v86d for Lucid Plymouth
http://en-gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Framebuffer helps sort out what to expect with SiS, and how to set things right. With Lucid I get my best performance by adding the following: 'video=sisfb:mode:1024x768x32,rate:70,mem:4096' between 'ro' and 'quiet splash' in the grub menu entry. Leave off the quote marks, be precise with punctuation. Hope that works for others. -- Old SiS video needs v86d for Lucid Plymouth https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/584339 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 584339] Re: Old SiS video needs v86d for Lucid Plymouth
Like I said, be precise with punctuation, That's http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Framebuffer -- Old SiS video needs v86d for Lucid Plymouth https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/584339 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 584050] Re: lucid fsck takes too long
I notice two things unique to Lucid in regard to fsck. 1. changing FSCKFIX=no to yes in /etc/default/rcS has _no_ effect. 2. the code in /etc/init/mountall.conf has some bearing on this. Item 1 appeared a while back in response to earlier impatience with Debian allowing too frequent fsck of ext3 systems. Item 2 seems fairly new and related to _mountall_ testing more than anything else. Maybe an unnecessary artifact? -- lucid fsck takes too long https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/584050 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 584339] Re: Old SiS video needs v86d for Lucid Plymouth
v86d does solve this problem; however, adding sisfb to /etc/modules does just as well. The splash screen does have an imperfection as shown in bun 521018, but it's not as objectionable as 30 seconds of black screen. -- Old SiS video needs v86d for Lucid Plymouth https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/584339 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 584050] Re: lucid fsck takes too long
Thank you for your automated response, Jeremy. To demonstrate this as your automated message suggests, I think would require two new installs. Since Ubuntu went to Grub2 I hesitate to do anything so major on my dual boot system without a very good reason. What I've noted I don't know how to demonstrate on a liveCD. It is something that happens on the 'forced fsck' every 20 mounts on an installed system. If the clues I've given don't suggest something useful regarding a regression I never experienced in the last several years using Ubuntu, then I can wait for a better reason to re-install. You might want to try using any liveCD of yours on any healthy unmounted Ubuntu system of yours and see what results you get for fsck on a 'clean' ext3 partition. I don't think it's one minute 40 seconds. -- lucid fsck takes too long https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/584050 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 584339] Re: Old SiS video needs v86d for Lucid Plymouth
This is probably another way to look at bug #530554. I agree with bug #530554 note 2. Lucid installer may (or must) not recognize SiS video needs sisfb. I don't remember this being a problem for me in Ubuntu 9.10, or say before Plymouth. -- Old SiS video needs v86d for Lucid Plymouth https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/584339 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 584050] Re: lucid fsck takes too long
Jeremy, FYI Concerning the obligatory fsck every 20 mounts with Lucid: With the splash screen _off_ , at 30 seconds of black screen the console reports that the fsck is being done by util-linux-ng 2.17.2; This lasts one minute 40 seconds before continuing to the login phase. No report of found errors on /dev/sda4, the Ubuntu partition. -- lucid fsck takes too long https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/584050 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 584050] Re: lucid fsck takes too long
ps. Bugs #423247 and #454233 may have some bearing on this. Bug #423247 refers to improper time stamp references. Bug #454233 refers to an unsuccessful attempt to fsck an ntfs partition. XP is on another partition of my dual-boot setup. -- lucid fsck takes too long https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/584050 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 201478] Re: evolution-exchange-storage crashed with SIGSEGV
** Changed in: evolution-exchange (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Fix Committed -- evolution-exchange-storage crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201478 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1882441] Re: Gwyddion Modules not loading: undefined math symbols
Funny thing, the modules fail to load with the same errors even with LD_PRELOAD=/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6 gwyddion despite the symbols being defined there. LD_PRELOAD does not influence dlopen()ed modules? Anyway, when the program is simply compiled from source code (using ~/opt/gwyddion as installation prefix): sudo apt-get install libgtkglext1-dev libfftw3-dev wget http://gwyddion.net/download/2.56/gwyddion-2.56.tar.xz tar -tf gwyddion-2.56.tar.xz cd gwyddion-2.56 ./configure --prefix=$HOME/opt/gwyddion make make install it can be run ~/opt/gwyddion/bin/gwyddion and works normally. So this obviously some linking peculiarity when packaging. I suggest to start by adding --enable-library-bloat configure option when packaging. It often makes things work when distros add evil linker flags. But it may be insufficient. We may have to add some explicit -lm when this option is enabled. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1882441 Title: Gwyddion Modules not loading: undefined math symbols To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gwyddion/+bug/1882441/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1882441] Re: Gwyddion Modules not loading: undefined math symbols
xitix5r: You need to follow the compilation instructions properly. If they start with sudo apt-get install libgtkglext1-dev libfftw3-dev either run the command as written – or at least ensure by other means you have the two packages (and their dependencis) installed. Obviously, you do not because fftw3 is found missing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1882441 Title: Gwyddion Modules not loading: undefined math symbols To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gwyddion/+bug/1882441/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 631395] Re: When upgrading from 10.04 to 10.10, exchange mail accounts no longer work in Evolution. When clicking the account, the folder structure won't expand and the account does not send or r
Still not working... though two days ago Synaptic downloaded an update for several Evolution components. Since it looks this bug is not THAT critical for evolution/gnome teams as to fix it quickly (I've struggling on this one for 2 months): Is there a known workaround for this? By the way: Luckily, Evolution is my 2nd. option for mail management, because I perform most of my work on Thunderbird + DavMail. For those stuck by this bug, my advice is to try T-Bird+DavMail combo. Not as good as Evolution + Exchange plug-in (assuming they work...), but good enough for most everyday regular job. Please, fix this ASAP: It is a shame for OpenSource community! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/631395 Title: When upgrading from 10.04 to 10.10, exchange mail accounts no longer work in Evolution. When clicking the account, the folder structure won't expand and the account does not send or receive e-mail (although) it does appear in the send/receive dialog box. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 631395] Re: When upgrading from 10.04 to 10.10, exchange mail accounts no longer work in Evolution. When clicking the account, the folder structure won't expand and the account does not send or r
Finally I found a solution. WARNING: This is an absolutely NON scientific method. It is 100% based on try & fail. So far, it's been working for me for the whole day. 0: Synaptic is set at maverick-proposed level. 1: Uninstall Evolution with "sudo aptitude purge evolution evolution-indicator evolution-documentation-en evolution-common evolution-couchdb evolution-exchange evolution-data-server evolution-webcal evolution-plugins". Don't care about warnings: Go ahead, because "Fortune favors the bold". 2: Delete your Evolution folder (at ~/.evolution). 3: Install again evolution + exchange plugin with "sudo apt-get install evolution evolution-exchange". 4: Restart Evolution. Let it sync. 5: Optional step: Disable as many add-ons as possible. Honestly I don't know if any of them is responsible... Before this, I've got three major problems: - At start-up, usually Evolution froze while syncing. Or downloading new messages content (headers showed up fine). - If started off-line, showed a wrong URL message for each preview. - Trash folder sometimes appeared as a regular folder, sometimes as a real Trash can (main difference was the absence of the "empty trash" option). Good luck! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/631395 Title: When upgrading from 10.04 to 10.10, exchange mail accounts no longer work in Evolution. When clicking the account, the folder structure won't expand and the account does not send or receive e-mail (although) it does appear in the send/receive dialog box. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 631395] Re: When upgrading from 10.04 to 10.10, exchange mail accounts no longer work in Evolution. When clicking the account, the folder structure won't expand and the account does not send or r
In Synaptic, "repositories", 3rd. tab (I guess it says "updates"), you'll find 4 check-boxes. You should mark the first 3 ones. Sorry if this is not exact, but I'm guessing what texts might say in english because my Ubuntu is in spanish. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/631395 Title: When upgrading from 10.04 to 10.10, exchange mail accounts no longer work in Evolution. When clicking the account, the folder structure won't expand and the account does not send or receive e-mail (although) it does appear in the send/receive dialog box. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 631395] Re: When upgrading from 10.04 to 10.10, exchange mail accounts no longer work in Evolution. When clicking the account, the folder structure won't expand and the account does not send or r
** Attachment added: "Pantallazo-2.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution-exchange/+bug/631395/+attachment/1774222/+files/Pantallazo-2.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/631395 Title: When upgrading from 10.04 to 10.10, exchange mail accounts no longer work in Evolution. When clicking the account, the folder structure won't expand and the account does not send or receive e-mail (although) it does appear in the send/receive dialog box. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 631395] Re: When upgrading from 10.04 to 10.10, exchange mail accounts no longer work in Evolution. When clicking the account, the folder structure won't expand and the account does not send or r
John: I'm sad it didn't work... I'll be back in 10 hours. I'll do some tests, trying to break mine. Let's see if I can reproduce what's wrong on yours. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/631395 Title: When upgrading from 10.04 to 10.10, exchange mail accounts no longer work in Evolution. When clicking the account, the folder structure won't expand and the account does not send or receive e-mail (although) it does appear in the send/receive dialog box. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 631395] Re: When upgrading from 10.04 to 10.10, exchange mail accounts no longer work in Evolution. When clicking the account, the folder structure won't expand and the account does not send or r
John: I've found that freeze while syncing at startup MIGHT (again I'm trying & falling) have a relationship with an option in your account preferences. I'm attaching a screenshot of what it looks in Ubuntu spanish (the option, unchecked in order to avoid the problem) is pointed. In english it should say something like "scan all folders for new messages". What I've found is that when this option is checked, Evolution hangs badly at startup. When unchecked, Evolution starts and syncs Inbox fine. Of course, you'll only be able to test this if you manage to start Evolution up to the point where you configure your account preferences. My advice, is try over and over. You may need to kill Evo, or even restarting your computer. Also, give a try to an off-line startup. ** Attachment added: "Pantallazo-3.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution-exchange/+bug/631395/+attachment/1774922/+files/Pantallazo-3.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/631395 Title: When upgrading from 10.04 to 10.10, exchange mail accounts no longer work in Evolution. When clicking the account, the folder structure won't expand and the account does not send or receive e-mail (although) it does appear in the send/receive dialog box. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1302736] Re: apt 0.9.15.4ubuntu4 uninstalls ppa:webupd8team/java oracle-java[78]-installer
Anyone can open a bug ticket for the webupd8 team? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1302736 Title: apt 0.9.15.4ubuntu4 uninstalls ppa:webupd8team/java oracle- java[78]-installer To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1302736/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1922441] [NEW] package initramfs-tools 0.136ubuntu6.4 failed to install/upgrade: installed initramfs-tools package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: initramfs-tools failed to install ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: initramfs-tools 0.136ubuntu6.4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-44.50~20.04.1-generic 5.8.18 Uname: Linux 5.8.0-44-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.16 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: skip Date: Sat Apr 3 09:17:36 2021 ErrorMessage: installed initramfs-tools package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1 InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-05-02 (335 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200423) PackageArchitecture: all Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.8, Python 3.8.5, python3-minimal, 3.8.2-0ubuntu2 PythonDetails: N/A RelatedPackageVersions: dpkg 1.19.7ubuntu3 apt 2.0.4 SourcePackage: initramfs-tools Title: package initramfs-tools 0.136ubuntu6.4 failed to install/upgrade: installed initramfs-tools package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1922441 Title: package initramfs-tools 0.136ubuntu6.4 failed to install/upgrade: installed initramfs-tools package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1922441/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1586100] Re: can't add an ubuntu one account
Hi Alberto, yes, I can reproduce this issue: 1. my ubuntu one account is available 2. got to store 3. search for an app (in my case a sudoku app) 4. There is a problem with the log-in 5. enter log-in information 6. as in 4. 7. as in 5. 8. as in 4. 9. go to account settings 10. there is no ubuntu one account and no option to add one 11. go to updates and log-in in order to get updates 12. log-in accepted 13. ubuntu one account is available in account settings -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1586100 Title: can't add an ubuntu one account To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1586100/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1586100] Re: can't add an ubuntu one account
this is the loop I'm stuck into ** Attachment added: "screenshot20160527_175828511.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntuone-credentials/+bug/1586100/+attachment/4671412/+files/screenshot20160527_175828511.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1586100 Title: can't add an ubuntu one account To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1586100/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1586100] Re: can't add an ubuntu one account
finally no option to add an ubuntu one account ** Attachment added: "screenshot20160527_175911364.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntuone-credentials/+bug/1586100/+attachment/4671415/+files/screenshot20160527_175911364.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1586100 Title: can't add an ubuntu one account To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1586100/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1586100] Re: can't add an ubuntu one account
this is the app which I tried to install ** Attachment added: "screenshot20160527_175818002.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntuone-credentials/+bug/1586100/+attachment/4671418/+files/screenshot20160527_175818002.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1586100 Title: can't add an ubuntu one account To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1586100/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1586100] Re: can't add an ubuntu one account
Here are some screenshots ** Attachment added: "screenshot20160527_175823740.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntuone-credentials/+bug/1586100/+attachment/4671411/+files/screenshot20160527_175823740.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1586100 Title: can't add an ubuntu one account To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1586100/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
