svn commit: r586293 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

[rjung]

Author: rjung
Date: Fri Oct 19 00:28:50 2007
New Revision: 586293

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=586293&view=rev
Log:
Cast a vote.

Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS?rev=586293&r1=586292&r2=586293&view=diff
==
--- tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS (original)
+++ tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS Fri Oct 19 00:28:50 2007
@@ -58,7 +58,9 @@
 
   +1: 
   -1:
-   0: yoavs
+   0: yoavs,rjung
+   Comment by rjung: Maybe switching "then" and "else" cases by using "-x" 
instead of "! -x".
+ This way the error exit stays the last case which seems 
more natural.
 
 
 * Add a working ANT script that signs and publishes JARs to a maven repo
@@ -78,4 +80,4 @@
   http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21009&action=view
   +1: fhanik
   -1: 
-  
\ No newline at end of file
+  



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

svn commit: r586292 - /tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS

[rjung]

Author: rjung
Date: Fri Oct 19 00:28:01 2007
New Revision: 586292

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=586292&view=rev
Log:
Add svn properties for substitution.

Modified:
tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS   (contents, props changed)

Modified: tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS?rev=586292&r1=586291&r2=586292&view=diff
==
--- tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS (original)
+++ tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS Fri Oct 19 00:28:01 2007
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
   limitations under the License.
 

 
-$Revision: $ $Date: $
+$Revision$ $Date$
 
  =
  Apache Tomcat 5.5 Patch Proposals

Propchange: tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS
--
svn:keywords = Author Date Id Revision



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

svn commit: r586291 - /tomcat/current/tc4.1.x/STATUS

[rjung]

Author: rjung
Date: Fri Oct 19 00:27:15 2007
New Revision: 586291

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=586291&view=rev
Log:
Fix EOL and set svn properties.
No content change.

Modified:
tomcat/current/tc4.1.x/STATUS   (contents, props changed)

Modified: tomcat/current/tc4.1.x/STATUS
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/current/tc4.1.x/STATUS?rev=586291&r1=586290&r2=586291&view=diff
==
--- tomcat/current/tc4.1.x/STATUS (original)
+++ tomcat/current/tc4.1.x/STATUS Fri Oct 19 00:27:15 2007
@@ -1,31 +1,31 @@
-
-  Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
-  contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with
-  this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
-  The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
-  (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
-  the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
-
-  http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
-
-  Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
-  distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
-  WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
-  See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
-  limitations under the License.
-
-
-$Revision: $ $Date: $
-
- =
- Apache Tomcat 4.1 Patch Proposals
- =
-
-
-PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT:
-  [ New proposals should be added at the end of the list ]
-
-* Fix important vulnerability when webdav is enabled for write
-  Patch: http://marc.info/?l=tomcat-dev&m=119245116910632&w=2
-  +1: markt
+
+  Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+  contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with
+  this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
+  The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
+  (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
+  the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+
+  http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+
+  Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+  distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+  WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+  See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+  limitations under the License.
+
+
+$Revision$ $Date$
+
+ =
+ Apache Tomcat 4.1 Patch Proposals
+ =
+
+
+PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT:
+  [ New proposals should be added at the end of the list ]
+
+* Fix important vulnerability when webdav is enabled for write
+  Patch: http://marc.info/?l=tomcat-dev&m=119245116910632&w=2
+  +1: markt
   -1: 

Propchange: tomcat/current/tc4.1.x/STATUS
--
svn:eol-style = native

Propchange: tomcat/current/tc4.1.x/STATUS
--
svn:keywords = Author Date Id Revision



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43653] - NIO connector may corrupt first line of HTTP response

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43653


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED




-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

svn commit: r586481 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml

[fhanik]

Author: fhanik
Date: Fri Oct 19 07:35:28 2007
New Revision: 586481

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=586481&view=rev
Log:
update changelog

Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml

Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml?rev=586481&r1=586480&r2=586481&view=diff
==
--- tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml (original)
+++ tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml Fri Oct 19 07:35:28 2007
@@ -35,6 +35,9 @@
 
   
 
+  
+Add ANT script to be able to publish signed Tomcat JAR's to ASF Maven 
repo (fhanik)
+  
   
 Use Eclipse JDT 3.3.1. (pero)
   



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43643] - Setting the executor attribute in a connector that does not support the executor attribute causes a

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43643


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED




-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43641] - Using the bind attribute for Membership tag causes Multicast to break

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43641


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED




-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43653] - NIO connector may corrupt first line of HTTP/1.1 100 Continue response

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43653


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
 Resolution|FIXED   |
Summary|NIO connector may corrupt   |NIO connector may corrupt
   |first line of HTTP response |first line of HTTP/1.1 100
   ||Continue response




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-10-19 11:15 ---
Additional info: occurs while sending HTTP/1.1 100 Continue
Second and third patch did not fix the issue (reopen).

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Mavenization (M10N) of Tomcat Build Process - Should Tomcat Be Migrated to Maven 2?

[Yoav Shapira]

Hey,

On 10/19/07, Paul Shemansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm going to keep waiting for more a few more +1s in the
> "as-an-alternate" category before doing any real work on it.

Speaking only for myself, I don't see how waiting helps anything.  I'm
+0 to you (or anyone else) doing the work and showing us a working
Maven build.  I'm -0 to committing to a build system idea before I see
its implementation.  It's just like most other issues or enhancement
requests: I'm always open to new ideas but I want to see the proof in
the pudding, so to speak.

And that's coming from someone who used Maven for his day job the past
couple of years, so is not a Maven opponent.

Yoav

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43663] New: - maxPostSize does not work in standard http connector implementation

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43663

   Summary: maxPostSize does not work in standard http connector
implementation
   Product: Tomcat 6
   Version: 6.0.14
  Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: Connectors
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


I'm using a standard http connector implementation. When I upload a file by 
posting a form, the default 2 MB limit is not enforced. Even setting 
maxPostSize="2097152" manually doesn't work. I can upload a 20 MB file and do 
not get any errors, the file is completely uploaded. I also tested this in 
Tomcat 5.5 in Windows and in Tomcat 6.0 in Linux with the same results. I do 
not know if there is any other way to avoid getting a huge request. I can 
disableUploadTimeout="false", but this may be bad for people with slow 
connections and do not give me byte precision control. I can also check the 
request size afterwards, but then time and space in the server have already 
been wasted.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Mavenization (M10N) of Tomcat Build Process - Should Tomcat Be Migrated to Maven 2?

[Yoav Shapira]

Hey,

On 10/19/07, Paul Shemansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I commit to working on it, and try to show some sort of
> proof-in-the-pudding, the issue returns to the problem I mentioned
> before which is hosting it.

I don't think that's a problem, and I don't think it has to be hosted
in the Tomcat repository, at least not initially.  You could host it
on your home page, on SourceForge / Google Code / any code repository,
on the Tomcat wiki, and in numerous other places.  You can send
periodic emails to the mailing list(s) saying "here's my cool
whizbang, it's free, please use it and let me know."  If others
express interest and start using it, great, we can talk again.  If
not, hopefully you still find it useful for yourself and you hadn't
wasted much time on it.

The point is, feature X  being integrated into Tomcat is not a
requirement for feature X to succeed, in my opinion.  So we're
spending much more time on these emails and discussions that we
should.  You think Maven would  be awesome for Tomcat?  Great, go
scratch your itch.  No need to spend a week building consensus.

> ready to start prototyping in my spare time.  Would you grant me
> access to commit the finished prototype if turns out to be good
> pudding?

Commit access is not my decision, it's made by all the project
committers together.  We typically look for a sustained contribution,
not a one-off enhancement or bug fix.  See
http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#meritocracy for
more about how the ASF works in this regard.

> Since you use it regularly, how do you personally feel about it?

Nice, but not amazing, and usually over-hyped.

Yoav

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Mavenization (M10N) of Tomcat Build Process - Should Tomcat Be Migrated to Maven 2?

[Niall Pemberton]

On 10/19/07, Paul Shemansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Yoav,
>
> > On 10/19/07, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > On 10/19/07, Paul Shemansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I'm going to keep waiting for more a few more +1s in the
> > > "as-an-alternate" category before doing any real work on it.
>
> > Speaking only for myself, I don't see how waiting helps anything.  I'm
> > +0 to you (or anyone else) doing the work and showing us a working
> > Maven build.  I'm -0 to committing to a build system idea before I see
> > its implementation.  It's just like most other issues or enhancement
> > requests: I'm always open to new ideas but I want to see the proof in
> > the pudding, so to speak.
>
> If I commit to working on it, and try to show some sort of
> proof-in-the-pudding, the issue returns to the problem I mentioned
> before which is hosting it.  I had originally mentioned the idea of
> opening a branch for it. However, I don't have commit access to the
> ASF repository, yet, and I felt too new to be asking for it.  Since I
> have made everyone aware that I would do the work, and the
> overwhelming consensus seems to be "integrate-instead-of-migrate", I'm
> ready to start prototyping in my spare time.  Would you grant me
> access to commit the finished prototype if turns out to be good
> pudding?

Given that the reaction's been pretty negative from those that have
commit access[1] I wouldn't hold out much hope on this.

[1] http://tomcat.apache.org/whoweare.html

Niall

> > And that's coming from someone who used Maven for his day job the past
> > couple of years, so is not a Maven opponent.
>
> Since you use it regularly, how do you personally feel about it?

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [LOBBYING] Add nio connector to configuration validation

[Costin Manolache]

-0

The setProperty was done way before JMX, and it's quite hacky. I think
standardising on JMX-like model is better - i.e. if we make changes to
setProperty and connector configuration, it should bring it closer to JMX.

In  JMX we have a "void setAttribute(...) throws AttributeNotFound", plus a
method to get supported attribute names.

So instead of returning the boolean - I think it would be better to add a
method to list supported attributes ( and with some changes to modeler this
could be reflected in the mbean - right now setProperty is ignored ). It's a
bit more complicated - but also more valuable.

Costin
-0

On 10/19/07, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ok, sending a little email to lobby for a useful change. To the contrary
> of comments and vetoes to this change, it doesn't change existing
> behavior, it simplifies it, and also adds the NIO connector to the
> validation of server.xml attributes.
>
> It'd be nice to get one more vote, so that we can get it in before the
> tag.
>
> From STATUS
> * Make server.xml parsing warnings more generic, add support for the NIO
> connector
> * Connector is no longer an exception case. Any new component can still
> use setProperty and return a boolean
> * to accept or reject the property
>
> http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/patches/digester-attribute-warnings.patch
>
>
> Filip
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43530] - Bad links on Apache Tomcat 6.0 Documentation Index

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43530


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Attachment #20994|0   |1
is obsolete||




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-10-19 12:07 ---
Created an attachment (id=21013)
 --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21013&action=view)
More comprehensive patch 

Fixes image refs and link back to home refs too. as well as incorporates the
good stuff from the previous patch


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Mavenization (M10N) of Tomcat Build Process - Should Tomcat Be Migrated to Maven 2?

[Paul Shemansky]

Hi Yoav,

> On 10/19/07, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > On 10/19/07, Paul Shemansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm going to keep waiting for more a few more +1s in the
> > "as-an-alternate" category before doing any real work on it.

> Speaking only for myself, I don't see how waiting helps anything.  I'm
> +0 to you (or anyone else) doing the work and showing us a working
> Maven build.  I'm -0 to committing to a build system idea before I see
> its implementation.  It's just like most other issues or enhancement
> requests: I'm always open to new ideas but I want to see the proof in
> the pudding, so to speak.

If I commit to working on it, and try to show some sort of
proof-in-the-pudding, the issue returns to the problem I mentioned
before which is hosting it.  I had originally mentioned the idea of
opening a branch for it. However, I don't have commit access to the
ASF repository, yet, and I felt too new to be asking for it.  Since I
have made everyone aware that I would do the work, and the
overwhelming consensus seems to be "integrate-instead-of-migrate", I'm
ready to start prototyping in my spare time.  Would you grant me
access to commit the finished prototype if turns out to be good
pudding?

> And that's coming from someone who used Maven for his day job the past
> couple of years, so is not a Maven opponent.

Since you use it regularly, how do you personally feel about it?

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [LOBBYING] Add nio connector to configuration validation

[Tim Funk]

For java/org/apache/coyote/http11/Http11NioProtocol.java

Is it me or does this look odd after the patch (as well as before) ...
public void setProperty(String name, String value) {
setAttribute(name, value);
if (/*omitted for word wrap since it doesn't matter */) {
return ep.setProperty(name, value);
} else {
return ep.setProperty(name, value); /*commit omitted for ww*/
}
}

Should this be simplified too:
public void setProperty(String name, String value) {
setAttribute(name, value);
return ep.setProperty(name, value);
}

-Tim

Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Ok, sending a little email to lobby for a useful change. To the contrary 
of comments and vetoes to this change, it doesn't change existing 
behavior, it simplifies it, and also adds the NIO connector to the 
validation of server.xml attributes.


It'd be nice to get one more vote, so that we can get it in before the tag.

 From STATUS
* Make server.xml parsing warnings more generic, add support for the NIO 
connector
* Connector is no longer an exception case. Any new component can still 
use setProperty and return a boolean

* to accept or reject the property
 http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/patches/digester-attribute-warnings.patch




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

svn commit: r586522 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

[remm]

Author: remm
Date: Fri Oct 19 09:32:52 2007
New Revision: 586522

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=586522&view=rev
Log:
- Propose a shell script update v2 (but it's better to ignore it, JF told me he 
would do something better
  later).

Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS?rev=586522&r1=586521&r2=586522&view=diff
==
--- tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS (original)
+++ tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS Fri Oct 19 09:32:52 2007
@@ -36,8 +36,10 @@
   available in /usr. As a result, it could now be possible to use a 
"/usr/bin/java" binary
   if one is present and expect results. [tested on Fedora 8 test 3]
 
 bin/setclasspath.sh(revision 585189)
-+++ bin/setclasspath.sh(working copy)
+Index: 
/home/remm/Work/eclipse/jbossweb-2.1.x/apache-tomcat-6.0.x/bin/setclasspath.sh
+===
+--- 
/home/remm/Work/eclipse/jbossweb-2.1.x/apache-tomcat-6.0.x/bin/setclasspath.sh  
   (revision 586293)
 
/home/remm/Work/eclipse/jbossweb-2.1.x/apache-tomcat-6.0.x/bin/setclasspath.sh  
   (working copy)
 @@ -30,9 +30,13 @@
if $darwin && [ -d 
"/System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/1.5/Home" ]; then
  export 
JAVA_HOME="/System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/1.5/Home"
@@ -45,12 +47,12 @@
 -echo "Neither the JAVA_HOME nor the JRE_HOME environment variable is 
defined"
 -echo "At least one of these environment variable is needed to run this 
program"
 -exit 1
-+if [ ! -x /usr/bin/java ]; then
++if [ -x /usr/bin/java ]; then
++  JRE_HOME=/usr
++else
 +  echo "Neither the JAVA_HOME nor the JRE_HOME environment variable is 
defined"
 +  echo "At least one of these environment variable is needed to run this 
program"
 +  exit 1
-+else
-+  JRE_HOME=/usr
 +fi
fi
  fi



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Mavenization (M10N) of Tomcat Build Process - Should Tomcat Be Migrated to Maven 2?

[Paul Shemansky]

John,

On 10/18/07, jkew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul,
> I agree with Costin.
> -1 to default

Default is out of the question.

> +1 to alternative

I'm going to keep waiting for more a few more +1s in the
"as-an-alternate" category before doing any real work on it.

>
> Some points:
>
> 1. I would be a willing tester.

Thank you.

> 2. Please make sure versions are put on every plugin / dependency.

Probably.

> 3. I have a love/hate relationship with maven. It sort of scares me.
> Debugging maven hurts.

Debugging anything hurts. :)

> 4. On the positive side, I like that a pom file is usually short and
> easy to understand.

In most cases, I agree.  Unfortunately, I can make lengthy Maven poms, too.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Mavenization (M10N) of Tomcat Build Process - Should Tomcat Be Migrated to Maven 2?

[Paul Shemansky]

William,

FYI - I love Gentoo.

On 10/18/07, William L. Thomson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gentoo's vote -1 for Tomcat using Maven to build instead of Ant :)
>
> On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 23:26 -0700, Bill Barker wrote:
> > I'm pretty much going to agree with Costin on this one.  I have no objection
> > to having a maven build as an alternative to the ant build (assuming that it
> > can do the same thing, which I don't really believe without seeing the pom).
>
> Only way I would be some what open to it is if the ant build system
> remained and maven was offered as an alternative. But maven only, no
> way. Alternative, doesn't matter, keeps all happy, but is it worth the
> dev time?

I think it is safe to assume that Ant is pretty much no longer on the
table for being replaced anytime soon.  As far as your issues with
packaging Maven in Gentoo, I wish you the best of luck.  I think we're
still waiting for more +1 votes to see if it is worth the dev time.
Only time will tell.  At this point I don't think I'm gonna hold my
breath.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [LOBBYING] Add nio connector to configuration validation

[Paul Shemansky]

For what it's worth :)
+1


On 10/19/07, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, sending a little email to lobby for a useful change. To the contrary
> of comments and vetoes to this change, it doesn't change existing
> behavior, it simplifies it, and also adds the NIO connector to the
> validation of server.xml attributes.
>
> It'd be nice to get one more vote, so that we can get it in before the tag.
>
>  From STATUS
> * Make server.xml parsing warnings more generic, add support for the NIO
> connector
> * Connector is no longer an exception case. Any new component can still
> use setProperty and return a boolean
> * to accept or reject the property
>   http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/patches/digester-attribute-warnings.patch
>
>
> Filip
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[LOBBYING] Add nio connector to configuration validation

[Filip Hanik - Dev Lists]

Ok, sending a little email to lobby for a useful change. To the contrary 
of comments and vetoes to this change, it doesn't change existing 
behavior, it simplifies it, and also adds the NIO connector to the 
validation of server.xml attributes.


It'd be nice to get one more vote, so that we can get it in before the tag.

From STATUS
* Make server.xml parsing warnings more generic, add support for the NIO 
connector
* Connector is no longer an exception case. Any new component can still 
use setProperty and return a boolean

* to accept or reject the property
 http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/patches/digester-attribute-warnings.patch


Filip

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PROPOSAL] Move Tomcat 5.0.x to the archive

[Peter Rossbach]

+1

Great!

peter


Am 19.10.2007 um 01:34 schrieb Mark Thomas:


All,

I would like to propose that we have reached the time where Tomcat
5.0.x should be archived. What this means in practice is:

- Sending an announcement out that no further work, including security
patches will be performed on 5.0.x. Current 5.0.x users are encouraged
to upgrade to 5.5.x or, ideally, 6.0.x
- Removing the 5.0.x docs from the web site
- Removing 5.0.x from the 5.5.x download pages (and hence the mirrors)
- Adding a note to the 5.5.x download pages that 5.0.x can be obtained
from the archives
- Moving the relevant tags and branches in svn to /tomcat/archive/ 
tc5.0.x

- Reviewing all 5.0.x bugs in bugzilla and closing them as WONTFIX or
changing the version to 5.5.x

Have I forgotten anything?

Mark


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: svn commit: r586444 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

[Peter Rossbach]

Hi Filip,

can you please add your last changes also to the changelog.xml?

Regards
Peter



Am 19.10.2007 um 15:35 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:


Author: fhanik
Date: Fri Oct 19 06:35:38 2007
New Revision: 586444

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=586444&view=rev
Log:
update status file

Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS? 
rev=586444&r1=586443&r2=586444&view=diff
== 


--- tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS (original)
+++ tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS Fri Oct 19 06:35:38 2007
@@ -63,11 +63,6 @@
  This way the error exit stays the last case  
which seems more natural.



-* Add a working ANT script that signs and publishes JARs to a  
maven repo

-  http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/patches/maven-publish.patch
-  +1: fhanik, yoavs, markt
-  -1:
-
 * Final fixes to the Cookie handling. This makes sure that we  
unescape any value
   that has been quoted and ensures the unescaping is the exact  
reverse of the
   escaping. This patch also tidies up ServerCookie to make it  
clearer what




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Mavenization (M10N) of Tomcat Build Process - Should Tomcat Be Migrated to Maven 2?

[Paul Shemansky]

Bill,

The last thing that I want to be responsible for is introducing a
stumbling block for all of the Tomcat developers and users.  This
thread should have also included "Maven 2 - Migrate, Integrate, or
Annihilate".

On 10/18/07, Bill Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm pretty much going to agree with Costin on this one.  I have no objection
> to having a maven build as an alternative to the ant build (assuming that it
> can do the same thing, which I don't really believe without seeing the pom).

I agree, "replacement" is no longer an option at this point - perhaps
in the distant future.

> But most mavenized projects that I have see (e.g. apache-commons) seem to
> spend much more time on the pom then on the actual module code.

FYI - I love writing code, and honestly I don't like being tied to
build processes. :)
However, I feel that Maven 2 is finally coming to fruition and believe
it would be nice to incorporate it.

> And most of  the look-feel of mavenized project's websites frankly s*ck.

I agree, but most of those sites do not even attempt to add style to
the default generated site.  Beauty is in the eye of the beholder (and
is in the hands of the CSS writer).  If desired, the generated Maven
site wouldn't even have to replace the current site, but could serve
as an addition to the current site.

> Personally, I consider maven to be a virus (downloading files onto my
> computer without my permission).

With Maven 2, dependencies are all downloaded into your local
repository, and they seem to be more organized than most other builds
which mimic this process.  The current Ant build downloads
dependencies without permission, too. Maven shouldn't be any scarier.

> M1 is difficult to configure to always run
> offline, and M2 is close to impossible.

It is difficult to believe that any developer is usually working
offline.  To me, this is like taking out the Starbucks or
Dunkin'-Donuts coffee drip-line which is attached to my veins.
However, I have not had too many problems with building offline,
unless I don't already have the dependency in my repository.  Maven's
"-Doffline=true" command-line option works well for me.

> > "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > -1 as well on switching to maven as default ( or back to many source tree
> > 'modules' ).

Maven would not be the default, but running "mvn" or "ant" from the
base directory would both be possible.  Many source tree modules is
out the window, at least for now.

> > But if you want to create a maven build file ( or a Makefile, or
> > eclipse/netbeans projects, etc :-) that builds tomcat - I personally don't
> > see a problem with that - as long as it doesn't require moving code around

Moving code would be minimal, if any.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

svn commit: r586444 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

[fhanik]

Author: fhanik
Date: Fri Oct 19 06:35:38 2007
New Revision: 586444

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=586444&view=rev
Log:
update status file

Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS?rev=586444&r1=586443&r2=586444&view=diff
==
--- tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS (original)
+++ tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS Fri Oct 19 06:35:38 2007
@@ -63,11 +63,6 @@
  This way the error exit stays the last case which seems 
more natural.
 
 
-* Add a working ANT script that signs and publishes JARs to a maven repo
-  http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/patches/maven-publish.patch
-  +1: fhanik, yoavs, markt
-  -1: 
-
 * Final fixes to the Cookie handling. This makes sure that we unescape any 
value
   that has been quoted and ensures the unescaping is the exact reverse of the
   escaping. This patch also tidies up ServerCookie to make it clearer what



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

svn commit: r586443 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/res/maven: mvn-pub.xml mvn.properties.default

[fhanik]

Author: fhanik
Date: Fri Oct 19 06:35:18 2007
New Revision: 586443

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=586443&view=rev
Log:
Add a ANT script that can sign and publish to the central ASF maven repo

Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/res/maven/mvn-pub.xml
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/res/maven/mvn.properties.default

Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/res/maven/mvn-pub.xml
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/res/maven/mvn-pub.xml?rev=586443&r1=586442&r2=586443&view=diff
==
--- tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/res/maven/mvn-pub.xml (original)
+++ tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/res/maven/mvn-pub.xml Fri Oct 19 06:35:18 2007
@@ -15,9 +15,15 @@
   See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
   limitations under the License.
 -->
-
+
 
   
+  
   
   
+  
   
-  
+  
+
+  
+
+
+  
+
+
+  
+
+  
+
+
+
+
 
 
   
 
   
 
+
+
+
+  
+  
+  
+  
+  
+
+
+
+
+
+
+  
+
+
+
+
+
 
+
   
   
-  
+  
 
   
   
@@ -137,6 +190,12 @@
   
   
 
+
+  
+  
+  
+  
+
 
   
   
@@ -173,6 +232,10 @@
   
   
 
+  
+  
+  
+Help is on the way!
   
 
 

Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/res/maven/mvn.properties.default
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/res/maven/mvn.properties.default?rev=586443&r1=586442&r2=586443&view=diff
==
--- tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/res/maven/mvn.properties.default (original)
+++ tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/res/maven/mvn.properties.default Fri Oct 19 06:35:18 
2007
@@ -12,26 +12,39 @@
 # WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
 # See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
 # limitations under the License.
+# 
+# To create custom properties, simply create
+# the file mvn.properties
+# in this directory
+# no need to change this file
+#
 
 #Maven properties
+maven.scp.username=fhanik
+maven.scp.privateKey=${user.home}/.ssh/id_rsa.export
+maven.scp.passphrase=
+maven.gpg.exec=C:/software/GNU/GnuPG/gpg.exe
+maven.gpg.passphrase=*
+
+
 maven.home=/development/maven-2.0.4
 #Define mvn for Unix systems and mvn.bat for Windows as ANT exec requires the 
full name
-maven.bin=mvn
+maven.bin=mvn.bat
 
 #Maven snapshot properties
 
maven.snapshot.repo.url=scp://people.apache.org/www/people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository
 maven.snapshot.repo.repositoryId=apache.snapshots
-maven.snapshot.deploy.version=6.0.X-SNAPSHOT
+maven.snapshot.deploy.version=6.T.X-SNAPSHOT
 
 #Maven release properties for Tomcat staging
 
maven.release.repo.url=scp://people.apache.org/www/tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/m2-repository
 maven.release.repo.repositoryId=tomcat-staging
-maven.release.deploy.version=6.0.8
+maven.release.deploy.version=6.T.X
 
 #Maven release properties for the main ASF repo
 
maven.asf.release.repo.url=scp://people.apache.org/www/people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository
 maven.asf.release.repo.repositoryId=apache.releases
-maven.asf.release.deploy.version=6.0.8
+maven.asf.release.deploy.version=6.T.T
 
 
 #Where do we load the libraries from



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Tomcat Wiki] Update of "PoweredBy" by ChristophePierret

[Apache Wiki]

Dear Wiki user,

You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Tomcat Wiki" for change 
notification.

The following page has been changed by ChristophePierret:
http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/PoweredBy

--
  http://www.shopformat.com/images/logos/logo.png
  [http://www.shopformat.com Shopformat eCommerce] - Flexible hosted eCommerce 
solutions for retailers and web designers.
  
+ = Sparus Software =
+ [http://www.sparus-software.com 
http://www.sparus-software.com/style/fr/images/a_logosparusint.gif]
+ [http://www.sparus-software.com/spip.php?article36 EveryWAN Mobility Manager, 
Windows Mobile device management and security solution], includes Tomcat. 
+ 
  = SpikeSource =
  http://www.spikesource.com/images/spikesource2/SpikeSource_logo.gif
  [http://www.spikesource.com/sitemgr/developer.php?nav=allComponentsd The 
SpikeSource Core Stack] includes Tomcat.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Mavenization (M10N) of Tomcat Build Process - Should Tomcat Be Migrated to Maven 2?

[Paul Shemansky]

On 10/18/07, Mary Joseph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi guys,
> i have been a passive listener all the while but i feel its time for change.
> I vote for Maven
> regards,
> Mary

Thank you, Mary.  However, I believe we are out-numbered. :)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Mavenization (M10N) of Tomcat Build Process - Should Tomcat Be Migrated to Maven 2?

[Paul Shemansky]

On 10/18/07, Peter Rossbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes!
>
> I can't see that maven build is better choice.
>
> Peter
>
> Vote -1 for build with maven!

What if Maven 2 is added in co-existence, instead of as a replacement?

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Mavenization (M10N) of Tomcat Build Process - Should Tomcat Be Migrated to Maven 2?

[Paul Shemansky]

On 10/17/07, Konstantin Kolinko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, Paul!

> You may start playing in some sandbox, creating a directory structure
> there, and pulling branches of tomcat code through the use of
> svn:externals property. It is called creating a view.

Thanks Konstantin,

I agree with the svn:externals setup, and can easily start putting
together a proof-of-concept.  However, since I still retain a "newbie"
status, I have no way to show it to anyone here, other than hosting it
myself.  I am ambitious, but until I see a clear acceptance, approval,
and direction of this effort, I am inclined to hold off.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PROPOSAL] Move Tomcat 5.0.x to the archive

[Tim Funk]

+1

-Tim



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Mavenization (M10N) of Tomcat Build Process - Should Tomcat Be Migrated to Maven 2?

[Wendy Smoak]

On 10/19/07, Paul Shemansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> If I commit to working on it, and try to show some sort of
> proof-in-the-pudding, the issue returns to the problem I mentioned
> before which is hosting it.

The place that comes immediately to mind is wush.net... maybe ping
Michael Ching and see if he'd be willing to donate some space
temporarily to try this out.  (And if not, it's $20 or so for three
months, not a huge investment.)

-- 
Wendy

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43653] - NIO connector may corrupt first line of HTTP/1.1 100 Continue response

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43653


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Attachment #21008|0   |1
is obsolete||




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-10-19 11:45 ---
Created an attachment (id=21012)
 --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21012&action=view)
"Tested to work correctly" patch update

Finally a working patch that is correct ?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

svn commit: r586571 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

[funkman]

Author: funkman
Date: Fri Oct 19 11:30:30 2007
New Revision: 586571

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=586571&view=rev
Log:
+1

Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS?rev=586571&r1=586570&r2=586571&view=diff
==
--- tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS (original)
+++ tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS Fri Oct 19 11:30:30 2007
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
 * Connector is no longer an exception case. Any new component can still use 
setProperty and return a boolean 
 * to accept or reject the property
   http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/patches/digester-attribute-warnings.patch
-  +1: fhanik, yoavs
+  +1: fhanik, yoavs,funkman
   -1: 
   
 * IcedTea support. Upcoming Linux distributions will package a (working) open 
source JRE,
@@ -70,11 +70,11 @@
   escaping. This patch also tidies up ServerCookie to make it clearer what
   applies to which particular cookie spec.
   http://people.apache.org/~markt/patches/2007-10-18-cookies.patch
-  +1: markt, fhanik
+  +1: markt, fhanik,funkman
   -1:
 
 * Fix MD5 files for distribution
   http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21009&action=view
-  +1: fhanik
+  +1: fhanik,funkman
   -1: 
   



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

svn commit: r586384 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

[markt]

Author: markt
Date: Fri Oct 19 04:39:51 2007
New Revision: 586384

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=586384&view=rev
Log:
Change my vote after patch revision

Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS?rev=586384&r1=586383&r2=586384&view=diff
==
--- tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS (original)
+++ tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS Fri Oct 19 04:39:51 2007
@@ -65,8 +65,8 @@
 
 * Add a working ANT script that signs and publishes JARs to a maven repo
   http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/patches/maven-publish.patch
-  +1: fhanik, yoavs
-  -1: markt (you removed the AL2 license from the file mvn.properties.default)
+  +1: fhanik, yoavs, markt
+  -1: 
 
 * Final fixes to the Cookie handling. This makes sure that we unescape any 
value
   that has been quoted and ensures the unescaping is the exact reverse of the



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Mavenization (M10N) of Tomcat Build Process - Should Tomcat Be Migrated to Maven 2?

[Bill Barker]

"Niall Pemberton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On 10/19/07, Paul Shemansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi Yoav,
>>
>> > On 10/19/07, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > > On 10/19/07, Paul Shemansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > I'm going to keep waiting for more a few more +1s in the
>> > > "as-an-alternate" category before doing any real work on it.
>>
>> > Speaking only for myself, I don't see how waiting helps anything.  I'm
>> > +0 to you (or anyone else) doing the work and showing us a working
>> > Maven build.  I'm -0 to committing to a build system idea before I see
>> > its implementation.  It's just like most other issues or enhancement
>> > requests: I'm always open to new ideas but I want to see the proof in
>> > the pudding, so to speak.
>>
>> If I commit to working on it, and try to show some sort of
>> proof-in-the-pudding, the issue returns to the problem I mentioned
>> before which is hosting it.  I had originally mentioned the idea of
>> opening a branch for it. However, I don't have commit access to the
>> ASF repository, yet, and I felt too new to be asking for it.  Since I
>> have made everyone aware that I would do the work, and the
>> overwhelming consensus seems to be "integrate-instead-of-migrate", I'm
>> ready to start prototyping in my spare time.  Would you grant me
>> access to commit the finished prototype if turns out to be good
>> pudding?
>
> Given that the reaction's been pretty negative from those that have
> commit access[1] I wouldn't hold out much hope on this.
>
> [1] http://tomcat.apache.org/whoweare.html
>

You have Costin, Yoav, and myself (and probably others, I'm too lazy to 
check the thread :) all on record as +1 for adding M2 as an alt build.  Go 
for it.  Personally I don't like maven, so will not personally support the 
pom.  But that isn't a reason that other people can't support it.

> Niall
>
>> > And that's coming from someone who used Maven for his day job the past
>> > couple of years, so is not a Maven opponent.
>>
>> Since you use it regularly, how do you personally feel about it? 




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]