On Mon, 2014-04-28 at 14:37 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-04-28 at 14:23 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 01:17:32PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > > Ping2. Please let me know if I should ping/cc other people to get this
> > > reviewed.
> >
> > Do you want to a
On 05/05/2014 09:23 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> Understood. Let's see that we can get an update committed soon.
> We can always improve on it further later on, which then will be
> a lot easier to do, review, and get pushed.
Yes. We already know that this is better than the current docs.
Let's c
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> In this PR the issue is that we reject (valid) code such as
> _Alignas (long long) long long foo;
> with -m32, because we trip this condition:
>
>alignas_align = 1U << declspecs->align_log;
>if (alignas_align < TYPE_ALIGN_UNIT (type))
On Fri, 2014-05-02 at 12:52 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Fri 02 May 2014 12:45:56 +0200, a écrit :
> > On Fri, 2014-05-02 at 12:00 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > Samuel Thibault, le Fri 02 May 2014 11:57:53 +0200, a écrit :
> > > > So we just need to fix guardsize in our
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 10:58 PM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> Richard Biener writes:
>> On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Richard Sandiford
>> wrote:
>>> Richard Biener writes:
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> Richard Biener writes:
>> On Fri, May 2, 2
Richard Biener writes:
> On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 10:58 PM, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>> Richard Biener writes:
>>> On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Richard Sandiford
>>> wrote:
Richard Biener writes:
> On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>> Richard Bien
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 10:04:33AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > In this PR the issue is that we reject (valid) code such as
> > _Alignas (long long) long long foo;
> > with -m32, because we trip this condition:
> >
> >alignas_align =
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> Richard Biener writes:
>> On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 10:58 PM, Richard Sandiford
>> wrote:
>>> Richard Biener writes:
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> Richard Biener writes:
>> On Mon, May 5, 2
Hi again,
On 05/05/2014 10:48 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 05/05/2014 12:25 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Good, but is it Ok to use uses_template_parms for that? A few days ago I
struggled to find something simpler ready to use, to no avail (well,
this is probably well known to you, but there are sur
Committed as obvious.
Richard.
2014-05-06 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/61070
* bitmap.c (debug_bitmap): Dump to stderr, not stdout.
* tree-ssa-structalias.c (dump_solution_for_var): Likewise.
Index: gcc/bitmap.c
===
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 11:28:27AM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
> On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 6:20 AM, Alan Modra wrote:
> > In cases where the compiler has no alignment info, powerpc64le-linux
> > gcc generates byte at a time copies for -mstrict-align (which is on
> > for little-endian power7). That'
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 7:41 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>> On 11/25/13 02:22, bin.cheng wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> I previously committed two patches lowering complex address expression for
>>> IVOPT at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg0054
Hi,
Attached are patches to enable gccgo to build properly on Debian
GNU/Hurd on gcc-4.9 (4.9-4.9.0-1). With split stack enabled 95 libgo
tests PASS and 27 FAIL. Many of the failed tests do fail only in a few
sub-tests. patch0.diff is debian specific, while the rest are for
upstream.
patch0.diff
(continued)
patch4.diff: src/libgo/go/syscall/libcall_posix-1.go: New file, a copy
of libcall_posix.go with the mount, mlockall and munlockall calls
removed. mount/umount functionality exists but is currently part of
Hurd utilities, the outhe two functions are not yet implemented.
patch5.diff: s
(continued)
patch7.diff: src/libgo/go/syscall/wait.c
Set WCONTINUED to zero if not defined (same fix as for lto in gcc-4.9)
patch8.diff: src/libgo/mksysinfo.sh
Add special treatment of EWOULDBLOCK, SYS_FCNTL and st_dev since they
are either not defined or defined differently for the script to ca
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 10:14:42AM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > Hmm, but isn't TYPE_ALIGN_UNIT wrong then?
>
> No, after all, you don't want to change __alignof__ (long long), that is
> pretty essential part of ABI.
Yeah, as I understand things, for x86_64 __alignof__ (T) returns
*preferred* a
Svante Signell, le Tue 06 May 2014 10:58:38 +0200, a écrit :
> The patch for st_dev by Thomas Schwinge was not liked by Samuel
Uh?
I said “These should be fine, however.” and “a sed rule can't hurt even
if there is no occurrence...”
So just keep that precise part back as it was, no need for bein
While I'd still like to detect the obvious wrong cases like outlined
in comment #27 of the PR the following makes the seemingly obvious
workarounds work (use -fno-builtin, -ffreestanding or -fno-hosted).
Ok for trunk and branches?
Thanks,
Richard.
2014-05-06 Richard Biener
c-family/
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 11:19:58AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> While I'd still like to detect the obvious wrong cases like outlined
> in comment #27 of the PR the following makes the seemingly obvious
> workarounds work (use -fno-builtin, -ffreestanding or -fno-hosted).
>
> Ok for trunk and
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 09:53:49PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 01:44:06PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> > On 05/05/14 11:37, Richard Biener wrote:
> > >
> > >Well, I hope that Andrew doesn't do without a namespace (and I still
> > >don't believe in what he tries to achieve with
Hi Richard,
> From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com]
> >
> > The ChangeLog are as follows:
> >
> > *** gcc/ChangeLog ***
> >
> > 2014-05-04 Thomas Preud'homme
> >
> > PR middle-end/39246
> > * tree-complex.c (expand_complex_move): Keep line info when
> expandin
Sorry, I forgot to include the new ChangeLogs:
*** gcc/ChangeLog ***
2014-05-06 Thomas Preud'homme
PR middle-end/39246
* tree-complex.c (expand_complex_move): Keep line info when expanding
complex move.
* tree-ssa-uninit.c (uninit_undefined_value_p): For SSA_N
On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 04:51:53PM +0530, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> * c-tree.h (C_ARRAY_PARM): New macro, alias for DECL_LANG_FLAG_2.
"New macro." would be enough.
> --- gcc/c/c-decl.c(revision 210004)
> +++ gcc/c/c-decl.c(working copy)
> @@ -4650,6 +4650,8 @@ push_parm_decl (const s
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 7:41 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>>> On 11/25/13 02:22, bin.cheng wrote:
Hi,
I previously committed two patches lowering complex address expression for
>>
On Wed, 30 Apr 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> With no longer recording alias subsets using BINFOs we now emit
> bogus alias warnings for accessing empty bases. The following
> avoids this, accessing those with an incompatible alias-set is
> harmless.
>
> Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unkno
Hi Qiuji,
I'll run the tests to double check. I haven't run spec with this patch nor do I
have current results for spec to hand.
Can I check that spec2000 runs OK for you without the patch for the same base
version of GCC?
Regards,
Matthew
From: qiuji-loongson [mailto:qi...@loongson.cn]
Sen
The patch on cost model was successfully committed.
I've separated the rest part of the patch on loads/stores group into
2: on loads group and on stores group.
Below is first part on loads group.
Bootstrap and make check passed on x86.
Is it ok?
ChangeLog:
2014-05-06 Evgeny Stupachenko
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Thomas Preud'homme
wrote:
> Sorry, I forgot to include the new ChangeLogs:
>
>
> *** gcc/ChangeLog ***
>
> 2014-05-06 Thomas Preud'homme
>
> PR middle-end/39246
> * tree-complex.c (expand_complex_move): Keep line info when expanding
> com
On Tue, 6 May 2014, Evgeny Stupachenko wrote:
> The patch on cost model was successfully committed.
> I've separated the rest part of the patch on loads/stores group into
> 2: on loads group and on stores group.
> Below is first part on loads group.
>
> Bootstrap and make check passed on x86.
>
2014-04-16 15:00 GMT+04:00 Ilya Enkovich :
> Hi,
>
> This patch restarts the series for introducing Pointer Bounds Checker
> instrumentation and supporting Intel Memory Protection Extension (MPX)
> technology. Detailed description is on GCC Wiki page:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Intel%20MPX%20sup
2014-04-16 15:35 GMT+04:00 Ilya Enkovich :
> Hi,
>
> This patch introduces Intel MPX bound registers and instructions. It was
> approved earlier for 4.9 and had no significant changes since then. I'll
> assume patch is OK if no objections arise.
>
> Patch was bootstrapped and tested for linux-x
PING
2014-04-16 15:52 GMT+04:00 Ilya Enkovich :
> Hi,
>
> This patch introduces target hooks to be used by Pointer Bounds Checker.
> Hooks set is different from what was approved for 4.9 (and later reverted).
> I added hooks to work with returned bounds and to prepare incoming bounds for
> va
PING
2014-04-16 16:19 GMT+04:00 Ilya Enkovich :
> Hi,
>
> This patch introduces built-in functions used by Pointer Bounds Checker. It
> is mostly similar to what was reverted from 4.9, I just added types and
> attributes to builtins. This patch also introduces pointer_bounds_type_node
> to be
Ping
2014-04-16 16:26 GMT+04:00 Ilya Enkovich :
> Hi,
>
> This patch introduces attributes used by Pointer Bounds Checker. Comparing
> to what was approved for 4.9, this one has additional attribute
> 'bnd_instrument' to be used for selective instrumentation.
>
> Bootstrapped and tested on linu
2014-04-16 16:33 GMT+04:00 Ilya Enkovich :
> Hi,
>
> This patch add new static constructor types used by Pointer Bounds Checker.
> It was approved earlier for 4.9 and I'll assume patch is OK for trunk if no
> objections arise.
>
> Patch was bootstrapped and tested for linux-x86_64.
>
> Thanks,
>
2014-04-16 17:18 GMT+04:00 Ilya Enkovich :
> Hi,
>
> This patch add new field for varpool_node to mark vars requiring bounds
> initalization. These changes were previously reverted from 4.9 and I'll
> assume patch is OK for trunk if no objections arise.
>
> Patch was bootstrapped and tested for
On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 11:07 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Tue 06 May 2014 10:58:38 +0200, a écrit :
> > The patch for st_dev by Thomas Schwinge was not liked by Samuel
>
> Uh?
>
> I said “These should be fine, however.” and “a sed rule can't hurt even
> if there is no occurre
2014-04-16 17:11 GMT+04:00 Ilya Enkovich :
> Hi,
>
> This patch adds flags and ifaces to mark instrumented calls, extends return
> stms with additional operand and introduces some basic bounds predicates.
> These changes were previously reverted from 4.9 and I'll assume patch is OK
> for trunk
Ping
2014-04-16 18:03 GMT+04:00 Ilya Enkovich :
> Hi,
>
> This patch introduces changes in call graph for Pointer Bounds Checker.
>
> New fields instrumented_version, instrumentation_clone and orig_decl are
> added for cgraph_node:
> - instrumentation_clone field is 1 for nodes created for instr
Just to explicitly ask for it:
Svante Signell, le Tue 06 May 2014 10:06:49 +0200, a écrit :
> For some (yet) unknown reason all libgo tests fails with a segfault when
> run in the build tree: make, sh or something else, the test commands are
> rather hard to track.
Doesn't that dump a core? Do y
Hi Guys,
There is a small bug in the computation for the size of the builtin
setjmp buffer. The size is based upon BITS_PER_WORD / POINTER_SIZE
which for most targets equates to 1. But for targets where pointers
are larger than a word, it equates to zero. This leads to stack
corruptio
This patch to the Go frontend fixes a bug in the handling of methods of
embedded fields. If the same type was embedded in a struct at different
levels, only the first embedded instance was considered when building
the set of all methods. If the second instance was at a higher level,
its methods w
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 4:06 AM, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-05-02 at 12:52 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>> Svante Signell, le Fri 02 May 2014 12:45:56 +0200, a écrit :
>> > On Fri, 2014-05-02 at 12:00 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>> > > Samuel Thibault, le Fri 02 May 2014 11:57:53 +0200
On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 14:51 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Just to explicitly ask for it:
>
> Svante Signell, le Tue 06 May 2014 10:06:49 +0200, a écrit :
> > For some (yet) unknown reason all libgo tests fails with a segfault when
> > run in the build tree: make, sh or something else, the test c
Svante Signell, le Tue 06 May 2014 15:05:20 +0200, a écrit :
> On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 14:51 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Just to explicitly ask for it:
> >
> > Svante Signell, le Tue 06 May 2014 10:06:49 +0200, a écrit :
> > > For some (yet) unknown reason all libgo tests fails with a segfault
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 01:55:18PM +0100, Nick Clifton wrote:
> 2014-05-06 Nick Clifton
>
> * except.c (init_eh): Fix computation of builtin setjmp buffer
> size.
>
> Index: gcc/except.c
> ===
> --- gcc/except.c (
On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 11:37:58PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> As a matter of QoI we should also diagnose use of _Atomic in the return
> type or argument types of main (something I deferred doing in the initial
> _Atomic support).
Ok, I opened PR61077 and I'm taking it. But I wonder if I sh
On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 15:07 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Tue 06 May 2014 15:05:20 +0200, a écrit :
> > On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 14:51 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > Just to explicitly ask for it:
> > >
> > > Svante Signell, le Tue 06 May 2014 10:06:49 +0200, a écrit :
> > >
Svante Signell, le Tue 06 May 2014 15:25:38 +0200, a écrit :
> On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 15:07 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Svante Signell, le Tue 06 May 2014 15:05:20 +0200, a écrit :
> > > On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 14:51 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > > Just to explicitly ask for it:
> > > >
>
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> 2014-04-16 15:00 GMT+04:00 Ilya Enkovich :
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch restarts the series for introducing Pointer Bounds Checker
>> instrumentation and supporting Intel Memory Protection Extension (MPX)
>> technology. Detailed description is o
Hi all,
This patch removes the NEON builtin functions for vtrn, vzip, vuzp and their
associated wiring and machine descriptions. The builtins were initially used to
implement the corresponding intrinsics in arm_neon.h but those have since been
reimplemented using the more generic __builtin_shu
This patch by Chris Manghane stores the flags for division checks in the
Gogo object, rather than referring directly to the GCC global variables.
Bootstrapped and ran Go testsuite on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Committed to mainline.
Ian
2014-05-06 Chris Manghane
* go-c.h (go_create_go
Hi!
This patch fixes a warning / leftover (from Feb 22) which I oversaw
too long in buildrobot's output. Committed as obvious.
g++ -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE -fno-exceptions
-fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings
-Wcast-qual -Wmiss
On 28/04/14 23:07 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
On 27/04/2014 15:39, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 17/04/14 22:43 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
Hi
Here is a patch to globally enhance debug containers implementation.
François, sorry for the delay, this is a large patch and I wanted to
give it t
On 03/05/14 20:21, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Vladimir Makarov writes:
Not sure how the constraint would/should exclude $sp-based address in
LRA. In this particular case, a spilled pseudo is changed to memory
giving the following RTL form:
(insn 30 29 31 4 (set (reg:SI 4 $4)
(and:SI (
Right. Tests appear correct and problem is in arm_neon.h. I'll work on a fix.
Cheers, Alan
Christophe Lyon wrote:
This caused:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61062
On 30 April 2014 11:18, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Alan Lawrence wrote:
Fina
Hi all,
A latent issue was recently exposed in the 4.8 branch. Due to the recently fixed
TARGET_FLOAT macro on that branch (r210004), we now hit the bug that the
configure-time default architecture flags do not include FP and SIMD even though
the default cpu target mandates them in aarch64-arc
Hi Jakub,
/* builtin_setjmp takes a pointer to 5 words. */
- tmp = size_int (5 * BITS_PER_WORD / POINTER_SIZE - 1);
+ tmp = size_int (5 * POINTER_SIZE / BITS_PER_WORD - 1);
That doesn't look correct to me. If the code wants to create 5 words long
array, but with pointer el
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Nicholas Clifton wrote:
> Hi Jakub,
>
>
>>> /* builtin_setjmp takes a pointer to 5 words. */
>>> - tmp = size_int (5 * BITS_PER_WORD / POINTER_SIZE - 1);
>>> + tmp = size_int (5 * POINTER_SIZE / BITS_PER_WORD - 1);
>
>
>> That doesn't look correct
Patch with fixes attached.
Currently if-structure is as following:
+ if (count == 3)
...
+ else
+ {
+ /* If length is not equal to 3 then only power of 2 is supported. */
+ gcc_assert (exact_log2 (count) != -1);
For stores group I've created another mail thread.
T
2nd part of patch is on stores group.
Bootstrap and make check passed on x86.
Is it ok?
2014-05-06 Evgeny Stupachenko
* tree-vect-data-refs.c (vect_grouped_store_supported): New
check for storess group of length 3.
(vect_permute_store_chain): New permutations for store
On Tue, 6 May 2014, Evgeny Stupachenko wrote:
> Patch with fixes attached.
Ok if bootstrap/regtest passes.
Thanks,
Richard.
> Currently if-structure is as following:
> + if (count == 3)
> ...
> + else
> + {
> + /* If length is not equal to 3 then only power of 2 is suppo
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 03:34:37PM +0100, Nicholas Clifton wrote:
> --- gcc/except.c (revision 210096)
> +++ gcc/except.c (working copy)
> @@ -286,8 +286,8 @@
>tmp = size_int (FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER + 2 - 1);
> #endif
> #else
> - /* builtin_setjmp takes a pointer to 5 words.
On 05/06/14 06:10, Ajit Kumar Agarwal wrote:
Hello All:
Could you please review this patch.
[PATCH] Break handler is used to support a normal hardware break.
This is similar to interrupt_handler except that RTBD should be used instead of
RTID.
Changelog
2014-05-06 Nagaraju
* gcc/config/mic
Hi Jakub,
But what will this do on targets where POINTER_SIZE is smaller than
BITS_PER_WORD? E.g. I think some options on s390 or ppc.
If you want it to be always 5 pointers, then you want
tmp = size_int (4);
and not something else, otherwise it really depends on how exactly it is
used, perh
On 05/06/14 07:31, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
2014-04-16 15:00 GMT+04:00 Ilya Enkovich :
Hi,
This patch restarts the series for introducing Pointer Bounds Checker
instrumentation and supporting Intel Memory Protection Extension (MPX)
technolog
please hold off on committing patches for the next couple of hours as we
have a very large merge to do.
thanks.
kenny
On 6 May 2014 15:25, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> 2014-05-06 Kyrylo Tkachov
>
> * config.gcc (aarch64*-*-*): Use ISA flags from aarch64-arches.def.
> Do not define target_cpu_default2 to generic.
OK /Marcus
On 05 Apr 17:22, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> Things seemed to work over here, but now I'm not certain whether the
> __start_/__stop_ functionality is GNU ld specific? Maybe we should
> just go back to the previous version of this patch which didn't try
> to use this.
>
> Bernd
This approach does not w
Ping?
At this stage looking for general feedback on whether the define_split
approach in this patch is appropriate. If it is, I'll do a clean patch
for full review.
Archive link: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg00078.html
On 2 April 2014 14:29, Charles Baylis wrote:
> Hi
>
> This p
On Tue, 6 May 2014 17:05:16 +0100
Charles Baylis wrote:
> Ping?
>
> At this stage looking for general feedback on whether the define_split
> approach in this patch is appropriate. If it is, I'll do a clean patch
> for full review.
>
> Archive link: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg0
On 05/06/2014 04:23 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
On further thought (yesterday was a little tired, sorry), I think that
nsdmi-template7.C is telling us that, in fact, we *do* want something
true when we are handling an NSDMI inside a non-template class of a
template class!
Right, sorry, I was think
Svante Signell, le Tue 06 May 2014 14:13:54 +0200, a écrit :
> > > +# Special treatment of EWOULDBLOCK for GNU/Hurd
> > > +# /usr/include/bits/errno.h: #define EWOULDBLOCK EAGAIN
> > > +egrep '^const EWOULDBLOCK = Errno(_EWOULDBLOCK)' ${OUT} | \
> > > +sed -i.bak -e 's/_EWOULDBLOCK/_EAGAIN/' ${
On Mon, 2014-05-05 at 21:53 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 01:44:06PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> > On 05/05/14 11:37, Richard Biener wrote:
> > >
> > >Well, I hope that Andrew doesn't do without a namespace (and I still
> > >don't believe in what he tries to achieve without lay
On 05/06/14 12:58, David Malcolm wrote:
But the prefix can be as short as e.g. "g" (for gimple), so gtry, ggoto,
gassign, gcall.
FWIW, I like this: I think it's clear and concise, and I think it avoids
the need for namespaces. (I'd prefer not to have a namespace, due to
gengtype).
Then let's go
On May 6, 2014, at 8:19 AM, Kenneth Zadeck wrote:
> please hold off on committing patches for the next couple of hours as we have
> a very large merge to do.
> thanks.
All done… It is in.
On May 6, 2014 9:15:09 PM CEST, Jeff Law wrote:
>On 05/06/14 12:58, David Malcolm wrote:
>>> But the prefix can be as short as e.g. "g" (for gimple), so gtry,
>ggoto,
>>> gassign, gcall.
>>
>> FWIW, I like this: I think it's clear and concise, and I think it
>avoids
>> the need for namespaces. (I'
Kyrill Tkachov writes:
> On 03/05/14 20:21, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> Vladimir Makarov writes:
> Not sure how the constraint would/should exclude $sp-based address in
> LRA. In this particular case, a spilled pseudo is changed to memory
> giving the following RTL form:
>
>
On May 6, 2014, at 8:07 AM, Nicholas Clifton wrote:
> + tmp = size_int ((5 * MAX (POINTER_SIZE, BITS_PER_WORD)) /
> BITS_PER_WORD - 1);
This is not right. The denominator should either be GET_MODE_SIZE (Pmode) or
POINTER_SIZE. See get_nl_goto_field for additional fun.
Also, the save are
On Tue, 2014-05-06 12:20:54 -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
> On May 6, 2014, at 8:19 AM, Kenneth Zadeck wrote:
> > please hold off on committing patches for the next couple of hours as we
> > have a very large merge to do.
> > thanks.
>
> All done… It is in.
My build robot experiences errors like t
Hi Honza,
On 05/05/2014 09:44 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Hi,
this patch fixes unfortunate thinko in get_class_context that invalidates
transitions from non-POD type to a polymorphic type that may happen by virtue
of placement new and apparently breaks openJDK and Qt. I really tried to keep
placement
On May 6, 2014, at 2:17 PM, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-05-06 12:20:54 -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
>> On May 6, 2014, at 8:19 AM, Kenneth Zadeck wrote:
>>> please hold off on committing patches for the next couple of hours as we
>>> have a very large merge to do.
>>> thanks.
>>
>> All
I have noticed build failures too (arm, aarch64).
It also looks like the git-svn-id property is now wrong/incomplete.
For instance, commit 9a5942c1d4d9116ab74b0741cfe3894a89fd17fb has:
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/wide-int@201706
138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4
How
On Tue, 2014-05-06 15:54:05 -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
> On May 6, 2014, at 2:17 PM, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-05-06 12:20:54 -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
> > > On May 6, 2014, at 8:19 AM, Kenneth Zadeck
> > > wrote:
> > > > please hold off on committing patches for the next couple o
On May 6, 2014, at 3:54 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
>
> I’m pretty sure this:
> will fix it. If someone can confirm that would be great.
I tried that on my p7 and on my x86_64 machines, they both build fine.
On May 6, 2014, at 3:54 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
>
>> My build robot experiences errors like this:
>>
>> g++ -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE -fno-exceptions
>> -fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing
>> -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-format-attribu
-- Francois,
remember to regenerate and commit the Makefile.in changes.
Thanks,
Paolo.
here is a comparison. The two areas were built using configure with no
options at all on x86-64. The comparison is between revision 210112 and
210113.Tsan is very unhappy but everything else looks ok.I know
that this worked a couple of days before the merge. I know that there
was some
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 06:00:14PM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> __asm__ __volatile__ ("ld %0,0(%1)"
> : "=r" (scratch[0]) : "r" (p));
Ick, I can't write ppc asm. That should be "b" (p).
--
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM
We only quote arguments that contain spaces, \t or "
characters to prevent wasting 2 characters per
argument of the CreateProcess() 32,768 limit.
---
libiberty/pex-win32.c | 46 +-
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libiberty/
We only quote arguments that contain spaces, \t or "
characters to prevent wasting 2 characters per
argument of the CreateProcess() 32,768 limit.
libiberty/
* pex-win32.c (argv_to_cmdline): Don't quote
args unnecessarily
Ray Donnelly (1):
Windows libibery: Don't quote args unnec
91 matches
Mail list logo
