On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 11:37:58PM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > As a matter of QoI we should also diagnose use of _Atomic in the return > type or argument types of main (something I deferred doing in the initial > _Atomic support).
Ok, I opened PR61077 and I'm taking it. But I wonder if I should
diagnose if the second parameter is e.g.:
_Atomic char **argv;
char *_Atomic *argv;
My current patch diagnoses only
char **_Atomic argv;
since I'm not looking through the pointers.
Marek
