On Wed, 30 Apr 2014, Richard Biener wrote:

> 
> With no longer recording alias subsets using BINFOs we now emit
> bogus alias warnings for accessing empty bases.  The following
> avoids this, accessing those with an incompatible alias-set is
> harmless.
> 
> Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, ok?

Ping.

> Thanks,
> Richard.
> 
> 2014-04-30  Richard Biener  <rguent...@suse.de>
> 
>       PR c++/61004
>       * typeck.c (cp_build_indirect_ref): Do not emit strict-aliasing
>       warnings for accessing empty classes.
> 
>       * g++.dg/diagnostic/pr61004.C: New testcase.
> 
> Index: gcc/cp/typeck.c
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc/cp/typeck.c   (revision 209928)
> +++ gcc/cp/typeck.c   (working copy)
> @@ -2921,8 +2921,9 @@ cp_build_indirect_ref (tree ptr, ref_ope
>        of  the  result  is  "T."  */
>        tree t = TREE_TYPE (type);
>  
> -      if (CONVERT_EXPR_P (ptr)
> -          || TREE_CODE (ptr) == VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR)
> +      if ((CONVERT_EXPR_P (ptr)
> +        || TREE_CODE (ptr) == VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR)
> +       && (!CLASS_TYPE_P (t) || !CLASSTYPE_EMPTY_P (t)))
>       {
>         /* If a warning is issued, mark it to avoid duplicates from
>            the backend.  This only needs to be done at
> Index: gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/diagnostic/pr61004.C
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/diagnostic/pr61004.C (revision 0)
> +++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/diagnostic/pr61004.C (working copy)
> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> +// { dg-do compile }
> +// { dg-options "-O2 -Wall" }
> +
> +struct A{ };
> +struct B:A{};
> +void f(A const&);
> +int main()
> +{
> +  B b;
> +  f(b); // { dg-bogus "strict-aliasing" }
> +}
> 

Reply via email to