On May 6, 2014, at 2:17 PM, Jan-Benedict Glaw <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-05-06 12:20:54 -0700, Mike Stump <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On May 6, 2014, at 8:19 AM, Kenneth Zadeck <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> please hold off on committing patches for the next couple of hours as we
>>> have a very large merge to do.
>>> thanks.
>>
>> All done… It is in.
>
> My build robot experiences errors like this:
>
> g++ -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE -fno-exceptions
> -fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing
> -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-format-attribute -Woverloaded-virtual
> -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings
> -fno-common -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I/home/jbglaw/repos/gcc/gcc
> -I/home/jbglaw/repos/gcc/gcc/. -I/home/jbglaw/repos/gcc/gcc/../include
> -I/home/jbglaw/repos/gcc/gcc/../libcpp/include
> -I/opt/cfarm/gmp-latest/include -I/opt/cfarm/mpfr-latest/include
> -I/opt/cfarm/mpc-latest/include -I/home/jbglaw/repos/gcc/gcc/../libdecnumber
> -I/home/jbglaw/repos/gcc/gcc/../libdecnumber/dpd -I../libdecnumber
> -I/home/jbglaw/repos/gcc/gcc/../libbacktrace -o alias.o -MT alias.o -MMD
> -MP -MF ./.deps/alias.TPo /home/jbglaw/repos/gcc/gcc/alias.c
> In file included from /home/jbglaw/repos/gcc/gcc/real.h:25:0,
> from /home/jbglaw/repos/gcc/gcc/rtl.h:27,
> from /home/jbglaw/repos/gcc/gcc/alias.c:25:
> /home/jbglaw/repos/gcc/gcc/wide-int.h: In instantiation of 'bool
> wi::ltu_p(const T1&, const T2&) [with T1 =
> generic_wide_int<wi::extended_tree<96> >; T2 = long int]':
> /home/jbglaw/repos/gcc/gcc/alias.c:346:28: required from here
> /home/jbglaw/repos/gcc/gcc/wide-int.h:1787:25: error: incomplete type
> 'wi::int_traits<long int>' used in nested name specifier
> WIDE_INT_REF_FOR (T2) yi (y, precision);
I’m pretty sure this:
Index: gcc/wide-int.h
===================================================================
--- gcc/wide-int.h (revision 210113)
+++ gcc/wide-int.h (working copy)
@@ -1442,7 +1442,6 @@ namespace wi
struct int_traits <unsigned int>
: public primitive_int_traits <unsigned int, false> {};
-#if HOST_BITS_PER_INT != HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT
template <>
struct int_traits <HOST_WIDE_INT>
: public primitive_int_traits <HOST_WIDE_INT, true> {};
@@ -1450,7 +1449,6 @@ namespace wi
template <>
struct int_traits <unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT>
: public primitive_int_traits <unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT, false> {};
-#endif
}
namespace wi
will fix it. If someone can confirm that would be great.
