Thanks, I find that a bit disheartening in that it means I can't trust the errata page to accurately reflect the status of the software at any time in the past. Any of the updates listed there could have been placed there at any time prior to today. I also just visited one of the mirror sites and took a look at the timestamp of the apache file that you noted was just delivered and it was dated 11-20 so, sheesh, it's no wonder people get so confused
Thanks for your help! Regards, Mike Klinke On Saturday 14 December 2002 03:12, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 18:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > That's the only explanation I can think of that makes any sense. I > > wonder what the date represents?? > > > > Do you know if the apache entry in the errata pages was also updated > > sometime in the past 48 hours? > > I think so. I recall seeing the notice in my email during the last > couple of days, but I no longer have it. I usually read those and throw > them out; updating when I'm affected by an issue. > > Anyway, I just looked at the summary window in Evolution, and don't > recognize any of the advisories listed there. I think there's been a > big push of updates. -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
